the 12 Core Mac

Discuss life, the universe, and everything with other members of this site. Get to know your fellow polywell enthusiasts.

Moderators: tonybarry, MSimon

D Tibbets
Posts: 2775
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 6:52 am

Re: the 12 Core Mac

Post by D Tibbets »

Don't forget the harsh environment of space. I think they do use off the shelf portable computers on the international space station for various reasons. But is the flight critical computing systems space hardened? Low Earth Orbit is fairly benign for space enviorments. Once you enter the radiation belts and travel past them you are exposed to significant radiation- mostly charged particles from the Sun. Do geostationary satellites use hardened computers? Intel at one time made space hardened processors. I have no idea of current standards.

ps: Some introductory considerations here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiation_hardening

Dan Tibbets
To error is human... and I'm very human.

palladin9479
Posts: 388
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2011 5:22 am

Re: the 12 Core Mac

Post by palladin9479 »

My understanding is that you don't need the CPU itself to be hardened but rather the container it's in. Rad hardening a single chip is useless cause there is a higher probability it'll strike one of the PCB traces and cause a jump in voltage that could interfere with the bus's. You need to harden everything being used, especially if high speed data bus's are present as they extremely sensitive to timing. A pretty good faraday cage design that enclosed all the sensitive computational equipment would have to be used.

ladajo
Posts: 6267
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 11:18 pm
Location: North East Coast

Re: the 12 Core Mac

Post by ladajo »

The problem is also similar in ways to EMP hardening.
The development of atomic power, though it could confer unimaginable blessings on mankind, is something that is dreaded by the owners of coal mines and oil wells. (Hazlitt)
What I want to do is to look up C. . . . I call him the Forgotten Man. (Sumner)

Skipjack
Posts: 6898
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 2:29 pm

Re: the 12 Core Mac

Post by Skipjack »

My software loves many core CPUs :)
On the rad hardening. I think a lot of the rad hardening is just redundancy. IIRC SpaceX has triple redundant computers that keep each other in check.

hanelyp
Posts: 2261
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 8:50 pm

Re: the 12 Core Mac

Post by hanelyp »

palladin, it isn't just probability of a circuit element intercepting a particle of radiation, but the likely results. A circuit board trace is massive enough that a cosmic ray is minor noise. A transistor in a CPU, on the other hand, is very tiny and sensitive to variations in conductivity of whatever material is hit. A transistor in the off state could be momentarily turned on by the ion trail left.
The daylight is uncomfortably bright for eyes so long in the dark.

palladin9479
Posts: 388
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2011 5:22 am

Re: the 12 Core Mac

Post by palladin9479 »

hanelyp wrote:palladin, it isn't just probability of a circuit element intercepting a particle of radiation, but the likely results. A circuit board trace is massive enough that a cosmic ray is minor noise. A transistor in a CPU, on the other hand, is very tiny and sensitive to variations in conductivity of whatever material is hit. A transistor in the off state could be momentarily turned on by the ion trail left.
Already said this
You need to harden everything being used, especially if high speed data bus's are present as they extremely sensitive to timing.
It's no longer "minor noise" if it interferes with the timing signal. Modern bus's transfer data on both the rising and falling edge of the clock signal at high frequency. If you screw with the timing or alter the voltage slightly at the wrong moment it will cause a bit to flip during transit and your computational results become invalid, without you even knowing about it. This is why modern high performance CPU's are coming equipped with a form of ECC to check the validity of the data coming across the bus and the results coming out of the CPU.

Post Reply