5 Fallacies Of Argument
-
- Posts: 1805
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:21 am
- Location: Monterey, CA, USA
Re: 5 Fallacies Of Argument
They're infuriated, Stubby.
Jebus betrayed them.
Reality's well-known librul bias again, no doubt.
Jebus betrayed them.
Reality's well-known librul bias again, no doubt.
We need a directorate of science, and we need it to be voted on only by scientists. You don't get to vote on reality. Get over it. Elected officials that deny the findings of the Science Directorate are subject to immediate impeachment for incompetence.
-
- Posts: 4686
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 8:17 pm
Re: 5 Fallacies Of Argument
This is the reason I have said from the first few posts he made, that he should be put on ignore--his constant and overriding disregard for the rights of others, combined with a long-term pattern of manipulating, exploiting and violating the rights of others--he's got antisocial personality disorder.Jccarlton wrote:There is a big difference between actually telling a lie, which is an intent to deceive and what our spammer calls lying, which is anything that his god like self doesn't agree with.
I was the first he called a racist, simply because I did not agree with the President on an issue. That was just the sign of sick things to come. The guy is obviously not balanced nor emotionally stable. He resorts to the most horrific kinds of personal attacks on any whim, and never demonstrates any sense of remorse for his sick posts. No one could get along like this without the anonymity afforded them on the web--they'd have dozens of folks looking for them in real life ready to bitch slap them into the next century. But this guy makes it his profession to hide in his anonymity and attack by whatever means anyone he deems worthy based upon his uneducated preconceptions.
Note that this glibness and superficial charm are likewise indicative of sociopathy.
And just noting, this kind of sickness could have any trigger. He doesn't honestly believe he's making friends and influencing people to his opinion. No one is that stupid. He's merely found a flag to justify his disgusting, hateful acts, and if that flag should ever fall for whatever reason, he'll find another flag and continue to justify being as misanthropic as he can, because ultimately such people's hatred and rage has nothing to do with any particular issue. It has to do with their own emotional troubles. No way to know what the source trouble is but I can tell you, there is no helping such a person with a conversation. Would take years of therapy and still little hope of removing the sociopathy. The usual remedy is to lock such people up.
"Courage is not just a virtue, but the form of every virtue at the testing point." C. S. Lewis
-
- Posts: 1805
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:21 am
- Location: Monterey, CA, USA
Re: 5 Fallacies Of Argument
You might get more sympathy if I didn't provide a solid source (not some idiot who slandered all the climate scientists and is being sued for it) for every claim.
We need a directorate of science, and we need it to be voted on only by scientists. You don't get to vote on reality. Get over it. Elected officials that deny the findings of the Science Directorate are subject to immediate impeachment for incompetence.
-
- Posts: 1805
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:21 am
- Location: Monterey, CA, USA
Re: 5 Fallacies Of Argument
Not to mention if you didn't lie about the meanings of logical fallacies.
We need a directorate of science, and we need it to be voted on only by scientists. You don't get to vote on reality. Get over it. Elected officials that deny the findings of the Science Directorate are subject to immediate impeachment for incompetence.
Re: 5 Fallacies Of Argument
Spammers make people think that they should be locked up.
-
- Posts: 1805
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:21 am
- Location: Monterey, CA, USA
Re: 5 Fallacies Of Argument
Meaningless insult by the out of arguments.
We need a directorate of science, and we need it to be voted on only by scientists. You don't get to vote on reality. Get over it. Elected officials that deny the findings of the Science Directorate are subject to immediate impeachment for incompetence.
Re: 5 Fallacies Of Argument
This showed up on my newsfeed this morning:GIThruster wrote:This is the reason I have said from the first few posts he made, that he should be put on ignore--his constant and overriding disregard for the rights of others, combined with a long-term pattern of manipulating, exploiting and violating the rights of others--he's got antisocial personality disorder.Jccarlton wrote:There is a big difference between actually telling a lie, which is an intent to deceive and what our spammer calls lying, which is anything that his god like self doesn't agree with.
I was the first he called a racist, simply because I did not agree with the President on an issue. That was just the sign of sick things to come. The guy is obviously not balanced nor emotionally stable. He resorts to the most horrific kinds of personal attacks on any whim, and never demonstrates any sense of remorse for his sick posts. No one could get along like this without the anonymity afforded them on the web--they'd have dozens of folks looking for them in real life ready to bitch slap them into the next century. But this guy makes it his profession to hide in his anonymity and attack by whatever means anyone he deems worthy based upon his uneducated preconceptions.
Note that this glibness and superficial charm are likewise indicative of sociopathy.
And just noting, this kind of sickness could have any trigger. He doesn't honestly believe he's making friends and influencing people to his opinion. No one is that stupid. He's merely found a flag to justify his disgusting, hateful acts, and if that flag should ever fall for whatever reason, he'll find another flag and continue to justify being as misanthropic as he can, because ultimately such people's hatred and rage has nothing to do with any particular issue. It has to do with their own emotional troubles. No way to know what the source trouble is but I can tell you, there is no helping such a person with a conversation. Would take years of therapy and still little hope of removing the sociopathy. The usual remedy is to lock such people up.
http://www.nbcsandiego.com/news/weird/S ... 17218.html
The disorder may be genetic and incurable. Though I find it hard to believe that our spammer had any friends in high school.
Re: 5 Fallacies Of Argument
Oh, is there a tiny spammer on this thread, I didn't notice. My mouse was squeaking.
-
- Posts: 1805
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:21 am
- Location: Monterey, CA, USA
Re: 5 Fallacies Of Argument
http://www.flamewarriorsguide.com/warri ... rapist.htmJccarlton wrote:
"Instead of making a frontal attack, Therapist attempts to shift the focus of the conflict to the combatants' psychological motivations and problems."
We need a directorate of science, and we need it to be voted on only by scientists. You don't get to vote on reality. Get over it. Elected officials that deny the findings of the Science Directorate are subject to immediate impeachment for incompetence.
-
- Posts: 1805
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:21 am
- Location: Monterey, CA, USA
Re: 5 Fallacies Of Argument
I'm currently thinking Evil Clown.
We need a directorate of science, and we need it to be voted on only by scientists. You don't get to vote on reality. Get over it. Elected officials that deny the findings of the Science Directorate are subject to immediate impeachment for incompetence.
-
- Posts: 1805
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:21 am
- Location: Monterey, CA, USA
Re: 5 Fallacies Of Argument
And still no arguments just more and more frantic and transparent attempts to shift attention from their lack.
We need a directorate of science, and we need it to be voted on only by scientists. You don't get to vote on reality. Get over it. Elected officials that deny the findings of the Science Directorate are subject to immediate impeachment for incompetence.
Re: 5 Fallacies Of Argument
Spammers can only squeak and chirp. They have nothing of value to say.
-
- Posts: 1805
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:21 am
- Location: Monterey, CA, USA
Re: 5 Fallacies Of Argument
I said it.Jccarlton wrote:Spammers can only squeak and chirp. They have nothing of value to say.
You're still spamming. You're out of arguments.
We need a directorate of science, and we need it to be voted on only by scientists. You don't get to vote on reality. Get over it. Elected officials that deny the findings of the Science Directorate are subject to immediate impeachment for incompetence.
Re: 5 Fallacies Of Argument
No matter how much gold the spammer thinks he is spinning in the end it's just crap.
-
- Posts: 1805
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:21 am
- Location: Monterey, CA, USA
Re: 5 Fallacies Of Argument
Lack of knowledge denies the silver in that stinky black ore.
We need a directorate of science, and we need it to be voted on only by scientists. You don't get to vote on reality. Get over it. Elected officials that deny the findings of the Science Directorate are subject to immediate impeachment for incompetence.