That doesn't matter after the Delayed Prosecution Agreement. Their pleas only matter if the case goes forward; but it never did. They were never convicted.
Neteller has been sold, and currently services customers with banking needs in over 200 countries. They were never prosecuted.
And it says so in the second paragraph of my source, which I just quoted for you above. Read for yourself.
If You Want The Data Quick Go To Watts
-
Schneibster
- Posts: 1805
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:21 am
- Location: Monterey, CA, USA
Re: If You Want The Data Quick Go To Watts
We need a directorate of science, and we need it to be voted on only by scientists. You don't get to vote on reality. Get over it. Elected officials that deny the findings of the Science Directorate are subject to immediate impeachment for incompetence.
-
Schneibster
- Posts: 1805
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:21 am
- Location: Monterey, CA, USA
Re: If You Want The Data Quick Go To Watts
So I have to ask: do you hate bitcoin too?
We need a directorate of science, and we need it to be voted on only by scientists. You don't get to vote on reality. Get over it. Elected officials that deny the findings of the Science Directorate are subject to immediate impeachment for incompetence.
Re: If You Want The Data Quick Go To Watts
Jccarlton wrote: Frankly the biggest argument against AGW is the people and organizations who advocate it.
Excellent research. I presumed much of that by simply taking a look at their blog, but we should all be grateful to you for taking the time to nail it down.
It seems to run true to form. Those advocating a great global warming crises are nest featherers without rationality or ethics. That is, aside from those who are outright fools.
‘What all the wise men promised has not happened, and what all the damned fools said would happen has come to pass.’
— Lord Melbourne —
— Lord Melbourne —
Re: If You Want The Data Quick Go To Watts
The thing is, these people make their case by tarring with a broad brush. Do they really think that they themselves won't be black in the tar? That none of it splatters on them? I guess not.Diogenes wrote:Jccarlton wrote: Frankly the biggest argument against AGW is the people and organizations who advocate it.
Excellent research. I presumed much of that by simply taking a look at their blog, but we should all be grateful to you for taking the time to nail it down.
It seems to run true to form. Those advocating a great global warming crises are nest featherers without rationality or ethics. That is, aside from those who are outright fools.
-
Schneibster
- Posts: 1805
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:21 am
- Location: Monterey, CA, USA
Re: If You Want The Data Quick Go To Watts
Another standard maneuver from the Denier Canon: if you lose a point change the subject to another one. NEVER discuss the implications of your loss.
I believe we were discussing the lie about one of the founders of DeSmogBlog.
I believe we were discussing the lie about one of the founders of DeSmogBlog.
We need a directorate of science, and we need it to be voted on only by scientists. You don't get to vote on reality. Get over it. Elected officials that deny the findings of the Science Directorate are subject to immediate impeachment for incompetence.
-
Schneibster
- Posts: 1805
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:21 am
- Location: Monterey, CA, USA
Re: If You Want The Data Quick Go To Watts
And Mann's lawsuit against Willard "Tony" Watts.
We need a directorate of science, and we need it to be voted on only by scientists. You don't get to vote on reality. Get over it. Elected officials that deny the findings of the Science Directorate are subject to immediate impeachment for incompetence.