ScottL wrote:A certain mid-southern state had some issues with the electric chair and mental retardation or at least consideration of such. I do believe its possible to get a single view population within a state that may side with inhumane actions, mob mentality if you will.
You are talking about what you would prefer, not what is written down to and agreed to. The Constitution says that this is a state issue, not a Federal issue. Regardless of the fact that you prefer to have mental illness dealt with by the Federal Government for fear that the states may kill the mentally ill, the Constitution says that it is not a Federal issue.
Like all issues, someone has an idea about how to do it right and decides that the only way to make it happen is Federally, so they ignore the Constitution or skirt it, talking retorically about it living and breathing, all the while knowing that the Constitution specifically says one thing and they are specifically trying to do another - just because they think they are right. Education, Drinking Age, Jobs Programs, Health Care, blah blah blah. A sea of Federal money, stolen for the purpose of bribing the states into doing what the Fed wants.
It is hard to amend the Constitution for a reason. But, if this is what you want, then amend the Constitution instead of just deciding that it would be best done Federally and just doing it regardless of the Constitution.
And if you believe the ends justify the means, just be aware that right now we are drowning in the ends.
regards