Peak Oil?

Discuss life, the universe, and everything with other members of this site. Get to know your fellow polywell enthusiasts.

Moderators: tonybarry, MSimon

Post Reply
MSimon
Posts: 14335
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:37 pm
Location: Rockford, Illinois
Contact:

Peak Oil?

Post by MSimon »

http://chiefio.wordpress.com/2009/03/20 ... -shortage/
We don’t know for sure what process makes oil and there are sound reasons to think that it is still being created in large quantities. For example, the Middle East oil fields have an astounding rate of pumping, yet they have more oil in them now as “reserves” than before the pumping began.

One very good explanation for “why” is the possibility that iron acts as a catalyst to turn CO2 rich rocks, in the presence of H2 propbably from water, into hydrocarbons in geologic subduction zones (which would explain the oil locations in places like Indonesia and coastal California with active subduction zones).

Much as we do it synthetically (heat, pressure, CO2, H2 or water, and metal catalysts – Fischer Tropsch in a nutshell); nature may be doing the same thing. Take a look at how: Oil may come from subduction of rocks.
He has copious links at his site.
Engineering is the art of making what you want from what you can get at a profit.

Diogenes
Posts: 6976
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 3:33 pm

Re: Peak Oil?

Post by Diogenes »

MSimon wrote: http://chiefio.wordpress.com/2009/03/20 ... -shortage/
We don’t know for sure what process makes oil and there are sound reasons to think that it is still being created in large quantities. For example, the Middle East oil fields have an astounding rate of pumping, yet they have more oil in them now as “reserves” than before the pumping began.

One very good explanation for “why” is the possibility that iron acts as a catalyst to turn CO2 rich rocks, in the presence of H2 propbably from water, into hydrocarbons in geologic subduction zones (which would explain the oil locations in places like Indonesia and coastal California with active subduction zones).

Much as we do it synthetically (heat, pressure, CO2, H2 or water, and metal catalysts – Fischer Tropsch in a nutshell); nature may be doing the same thing. Take a look at how: Oil may come from subduction of rocks.
He has copious links at his site.

For the Record, I have always believed in the Abiotic theory of oil.

Skipjack
Posts: 6898
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 2:29 pm

Post by Skipjack »

Hmmm, personally I am agnostic about this. There are also other geological theories, that IIRC state that oil is produced somewhere in the mantle.
I am wondering though, since we have more than one plausible theory about how oil is created, maybe there is more than one way it is happening? I mean how unlikely is it, that (maybe depending on where it is found) oil has been created by a different process?

chrismb
Posts: 3161
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 6:00 pm

Post by chrismb »

It is the left-over attempts at carbon capture from a previously doomed civilisation.

Obvious, really (to those that sit on the IPCC panel).

Possibly, even, "beyond doubt" and no longer a debating point?

Helius
Posts: 465
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 9:48 pm
Location: Syracuse, New York

Post by Helius »

Biotic or Abiotic, It's a safe bet that if the earth produced Oil at anywhere near the rate that we burn it, it'd be a very different world.

If we're taking a poll, I'd say Abiotic.

Post Reply