Nuclear Thermal Rockets, 'backwards'

Discuss life, the universe, and everything with other members of this site. Get to know your fellow polywell enthusiasts.

Moderators: tonybarry, MSimon

Post Reply
hanelyp
Posts: 2261
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 8:50 pm

Nuclear Thermal Rockets, 'backwards'

Post by hanelyp »

Looking at a cross section of the Kiwi engine, http://up-ship.com/blog/?p=24791, got me thinking of a variant. Instead of running the hydrogen propellant through the graphite moderator then the nuclear core, run it backwards. My novice level materials tech tells me the graphite can handle higher temperatures than the fission core. The result could be the core heating to its limit, then the reflector, heated by nuclear radiation, giving a modest additional heat.
The daylight is uncomfortably bright for eyes so long in the dark.

ladajo
Posts: 6267
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 11:18 pm
Location: North East Coast

Re: Nuclear Thermal Rockets, 'backwards'

Post by ladajo »

As I recall off the top of my head, the point is for the propellant to cool the moderator, and get some pre-heat at the same time.
Doing it backwards would defeat that.
The development of atomic power, though it could confer unimaginable blessings on mankind, is something that is dreaded by the owners of coal mines and oil wells. (Hazlitt)
What I want to do is to look up C. . . . I call him the Forgotten Man. (Sumner)

Post Reply