TDPerk is a very naughty fellow telling untruths
-
Schneibster
- Posts: 1805
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:21 am
- Location: Monterey, CA, USA
TDPerk is a very naughty fellow telling untruths
and a coward who has no honor and will not answer when given the lie.
Last edited by Schneibster on Mon Nov 04, 2013 1:24 am, edited 2 times in total.
We need a directorate of science, and we need it to be voted on only by scientists. You don't get to vote on reality. Get over it. Elected officials that deny the findings of the Science Directorate are subject to immediate impeachment for incompetence.
-
Schneibster
- Posts: 1805
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:21 am
- Location: Monterey, CA, USA
Re: TDJerk is a liar
You said,
I never said this, never claimed it once. You made this up. It's a fantasy. You haven't read what I think and don't care; your only concern is to harass me until I go away.
Why are you here? You don't want to know the truth.
This is an outright lie. You said it here: viewtopic.php?f=8&t=4895&start=15#p107153TDPerk wrote:You are spamming us with fairy tales about how human released CO2 is somehow different from other CO2,
I never said this, never claimed it once. You made this up. It's a fantasy. You haven't read what I think and don't care; your only concern is to harass me until I go away.
Why are you here? You don't want to know the truth.
We need a directorate of science, and we need it to be voted on only by scientists. You don't get to vote on reality. Get over it. Elected officials that deny the findings of the Science Directorate are subject to immediate impeachment for incompetence.
-
Schneibster
- Posts: 1805
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:21 am
- Location: Monterey, CA, USA
Re: TDJerk is a liar
Next time try to fix it so the first sentence of your post isn't a lie.
I'm not here to pet you and tell you you won again no matter how bad you did.
I'm not here to pet you and tell you you won again no matter how bad you did.
We need a directorate of science, and we need it to be voted on only by scientists. You don't get to vote on reality. Get over it. Elected officials that deny the findings of the Science Directorate are subject to immediate impeachment for incompetence.
-
Schneibster
- Posts: 1805
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:21 am
- Location: Monterey, CA, USA
Re: TDperk is a very naughty fellow telling untruths
I can be immediately and easily be proven wrong by TDPerk posting where I claimed there were "different kinds of CO2[sic]."
Three possible such "differences" exist:
1. Different isotopes of oxygen.
2. Different isotopes of carbon.
3. There might be different sources; however, other than the isotopes, there shouldn't be any "different CO2[sic]."
As far as I'm aware the closest I've come to mentioning any of these is when I mentioned the δO18 proxy for temperature. And I mentioned radiocarbon; but never as a component of CO2.
Three possible such "differences" exist:
1. Different isotopes of oxygen.
2. Different isotopes of carbon.
3. There might be different sources; however, other than the isotopes, there shouldn't be any "different CO2[sic]."
As far as I'm aware the closest I've come to mentioning any of these is when I mentioned the δO18 proxy for temperature. And I mentioned radiocarbon; but never as a component of CO2.
We need a directorate of science, and we need it to be voted on only by scientists. You don't get to vote on reality. Get over it. Elected officials that deny the findings of the Science Directorate are subject to immediate impeachment for incompetence.
-
Schneibster
- Posts: 1805
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:21 am
- Location: Monterey, CA, USA
Re: TDPerk is a very naughty fellow telling untruths
This individual is now "doubling down," pretending no evidence is necessary to support its claim. Attempting to support its lie with more bigger lies.
It's quite colorful. Pretty ugly though.
It's quite colorful. Pretty ugly though.
We need a directorate of science, and we need it to be voted on only by scientists. You don't get to vote on reality. Get over it. Elected officials that deny the findings of the Science Directorate are subject to immediate impeachment for incompetence.
-
Schneibster
- Posts: 1805
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:21 am
- Location: Monterey, CA, USA
Re: TDPerk is a very naughty fellow telling untruths
"Different CO2[sic]" my azz.
We need a directorate of science, and we need it to be voted on only by scientists. You don't get to vote on reality. Get over it. Elected officials that deny the findings of the Science Directorate are subject to immediate impeachment for incompetence.
-
Schneibster
- Posts: 1805
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:21 am
- Location: Monterey, CA, USA
Re: TDPerk is a very naughty fellow telling untruths
Just so we remember:
This is an outright lie. You said it here: viewtopic.php?f=8&t=4895&start=15#p107153TDPerk wrote:You are spamming us with fairy tales about how human released CO2 is somehow different from other CO2,
We need a directorate of science, and we need it to be voted on only by scientists. You don't get to vote on reality. Get over it. Elected officials that deny the findings of the Science Directorate are subject to immediate impeachment for incompetence.
-
Schneibster
- Posts: 1805
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:21 am
- Location: Monterey, CA, USA
Re: TDPerk is a very naughty fellow telling untruths
There just isn't anything to say here. I never said that, I never intended to say that, and I never wanted to say that. You lied when you claimed I said it, and that's the truth, period. There isn't anywhere to hide with your BS.
We need a directorate of science, and we need it to be voted on only by scientists. You don't get to vote on reality. Get over it. Elected officials that deny the findings of the Science Directorate are subject to immediate impeachment for incompetence.