http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/10/21/p ... k-of-xxxx/
“Lastly, the “crock of xxxx” statement was focussed entirely on recent work By Michael Mann w.r.t. hypothesised missing rings in tree-ring records (a whole bunch of papers listed below).
Although a rather flippant statement, I stand by it and Mann is well aware of my criticisms (privately and through the peer reviewed literature) of his recent work.
Rob”
I think that sums up most of Mann's career.
Other Scientists Opinion Of Mann
-
Schneibster
- Posts: 1805
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:21 am
- Location: Monterey, CA, USA
Re: Other Scientists Opinion Of Mann
So is that MD "scientists," BS "scientists," or electronics technician "scientists?"
Just askin'.
Meanwhile getting your stuff published is the peer community's judgement on you and he's never had any trouble.
How 'bout you?
Last but not least peer review is not a popularity contest. People who obviously turn it into one don't get asked to review anything else.
Just askin'.
Meanwhile getting your stuff published is the peer community's judgement on you and he's never had any trouble.
How 'bout you?
Last but not least peer review is not a popularity contest. People who obviously turn it into one don't get asked to review anything else.
We need a directorate of science, and we need it to be voted on only by scientists. You don't get to vote on reality. Get over it. Elected officials that deny the findings of the Science Directorate are subject to immediate impeachment for incompetence.