There are things you look at and say, "I don't think that this is a good idea!!"
http://nextbigfuture.com/2013/10/cyborg ... o-map.html
Could We Have A Future Without Cyborg Nanoenehanced Roaches
Re: Could We Have A Future Without Cyborg Nanoenehanced Roac
Too late. From the Skynet thread:
http://phys.org/news/2012-09-technique- ... video.html
http://phys.org/news/2012-09-technique- ... video.html
Re: Could We Have A Future Without Cyborg Nanoenehanced Roac
No, NO, NO. This is a monster movie in the making. Complete with supervillian possibilities. I can see the pitch to Syfy now. It will be worse than Sharknado. and this is REAL. It makes me think that cutting science funding isn't only good, but necessary(not really). It's science run amok(Ok just a little).DeltaV wrote:Too late. From the Skynet thread:
http://phys.org/news/2012-09-technique- ... video.html
-
- Posts: 1805
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:21 am
- Location: Monterey, CA, USA
Re: Could We Have A Future Without Cyborg Nanoenehanced Roac
Wait'll they cyberenhance these:

click... clickclick... click... clickclickclikclikclik... cliklikliklikliklikliklikliklik

click... clickclick... click... clickclickclikclikclik... cliklikliklikliklikliklikliklik
We need a directorate of science, and we need it to be voted on only by scientists. You don't get to vote on reality. Get over it. Elected officials that deny the findings of the Science Directorate are subject to immediate impeachment for incompetence.
-
- Posts: 1805
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:21 am
- Location: Monterey, CA, USA
Re: Could We Have A Future Without Cyborg Nanoenehanced Roac
Just in case you doubted:

I, for one, welcome our new arachnid overlords.


I, for one, welcome our new arachnid overlords.

We need a directorate of science, and we need it to be voted on only by scientists. You don't get to vote on reality. Get over it. Elected officials that deny the findings of the Science Directorate are subject to immediate impeachment for incompetence.