Effects of high energy alpha on materials
Effects of high energy alpha on materials
Looking around on the web I have found some discussion of the effects of high energy neutrons on materials - dislocations, embrittlement, swelling, transmutation to radioactive isotopes. Can someone say what effect comparably energetic alpha radiation has?
It won't be anywhere near as bad as neutron damage because the penetration depth is far less. Neutrons always get absorbed and cause chemical changes, alphas rarely do that.
The outer layer that gets first impact will have similar stresses, but the bulk material will be able to hold up. Regular maintanance will then be to polish up that outer layer - and it may only be a few microns thick. If you have to do that once every 6 months and replace things once every 25 years it's not too bad.
Bottom line is that alphas are much, much easier to deal with.
The outer layer that gets first impact will have similar stresses, but the bulk material will be able to hold up. Regular maintanance will then be to polish up that outer layer - and it may only be a few microns thick. If you have to do that once every 6 months and replace things once every 25 years it's not too bad.
Bottom line is that alphas are much, much easier to deal with.
I would add that there does seem to be an additional problem with alphas, due to the fact that they don't penetrate very far. Most of their energy is deposited near the surface, which can cause liberation of surface atoms, possibly in large numbers. This is referred to as the sputtering problem.
At 80% grid transparency and zero ion loss, one alpha impact would have to release an average of 5/3 boron-11 atoms and 5/3 light hydrogen atoms for the reactor to be self-fueling. Any more than that and the core will flood. Any other material besides protium or boron-11 and the core will be poisoned.
Pulsing may enable it to be cleared. Neutronic fuels may still have this problem; neutrons tend to go deep, but D+D can release protons.
At 80% grid transparency and zero ion loss, one alpha impact would have to release an average of 5/3 boron-11 atoms and 5/3 light hydrogen atoms for the reactor to be self-fueling. Any more than that and the core will flood. Any other material besides protium or boron-11 and the core will be poisoned.
Pulsing may enable it to be cleared. Neutronic fuels may still have this problem; neutrons tend to go deep, but D+D can release protons.
-
- Posts: 308
- Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2008 1:15 pm
Would this only be a problem for the test reactor? That is, if we're taking the energy from the machine as a generator by decellerating the alphas to create electrical current for use, then won't the impacts be lessened or negated nearly entirely?
As usual I'm probably misunderstanding something here...
Mike
As usual I'm probably misunderstanding something here...
Mike
93143 mentioned 80% grid transparency. This means 80% of the alphas get outside the MaGrid and can be used for generating power by decelerating them.Mike Holmes wrote:Would this only be a problem for the test reactor? That is, if we're taking the energy from the machine as a generator by decellerating the alphas to create electrical current for use, then won't the impacts be lessened or negated nearly entirely?
That still leaves the 20% that smash into the MaGrid, causing heating, sputtering, and (if it's a neutron not an alpha particle) radioactivity. Remember that there will be a small number of neutrons even in aneutronic fusion (p-B11 fusion).
20% of a 100MW fusion reaction is a LOT of power barraging the MaGrid.
We have a solution: a LOT of heat transfer.dch24 wrote:20% of a 100MW fusion reaction is a LOT of power barraging the MaGrid.
About 100 to 400 gpm of cooling water per grid. Not too bad. (multiply by 4X to get l/min - close enough for now).
Engineering is the art of making what you want from what you can get at a profit.
-
- Posts: 650
- Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2007 2:41 am
MSimon wrote:We have a solution: a LOT of heat transfer.dch24 wrote:20% of a 100MW fusion reaction is a LOT of power barraging the MaGrid.
About 100 to 400 gpm of cooling water per grid. Not too bad. (multiply by 4X to get l/min - close enough for now).
Hee hee hee hee.... I hate being a nuisance, but there's still the idea of using the MagGrid AS part of the collector grid. At first I thought it might work, then I thought it wouldn't, now i'm not sure.
If alphas are leaving the wiffleball with it's negative potential, and moving towards the MagGrid at it's positive potential, won't they be deccelerate by the gradient between the two ? And once they strike the MagGrid, won't they pull a couple of electrons out of it and become neutrals ?
Maybe I don't know as much about this design as others, but i'm thinking that with enough parameter juggling, the idea might work.
David
Fore efficient collection the grid should be charged to particle MeV/particle charge.
However, if you do that the energy output goes negative due to the energy imparted to the pB11.
You will get some help. i.e. (grid voltage * particle charge) of energy per particle collected. However, 90% or more of the particle energy will appear at the grids as heat.
However, if you do that the energy output goes negative due to the energy imparted to the pB11.
You will get some help. i.e. (grid voltage * particle charge) of energy per particle collected. However, 90% or more of the particle energy will appear at the grids as heat.
Engineering is the art of making what you want from what you can get at a profit.
Some will drift around. Some will get implanted in the surface of the grid.nferguso wrote:I gather then that (at the risk of being too deterministic) the particles hit the magnets more like beanbags than golf balls? They don't bounce off with most of their energy but instead pick up a couple of electrons and, what, drift around?
Engineering is the art of making what you want from what you can get at a profit.
You are in the molecular flow region. There are some tricks you can play around with to ensure that alpha particles only go in the directions you want and eliminate backscatter and sputtering. For instance you could make the grids as bank of short thin walled tubes. or layered sheet metal grids. If you do it right, everything that bounces in can't bounce back out.
-
- Posts: 308
- Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2008 1:15 pm
Oh, now I wish I could recall where I saw a quote, but I can't. Somebody speaking of the Polywell process said that the neutrons produced would be few enough, and maybe more importantly, unenergetic enough, that the half-lives of anything created by neutron impacts would be short enough that one would be able to sfely walk into the room with the generator only a few minutes after it was shut down.
Could have been pure speculation, but I recall the source seeming to know what they were talking about. Anybody know from whence I'm recalling this quote?
Anyhow, for water cooling... do we then use the heat energy in the water to turn a turbine? Thus capturing some percentage of that 20% of otherwise "lost" energy? And cooling it in the process for reuse?
Um... "regenerative breaking" for a polywell engine? If you will?
I know, I know... "engineering details..."
Are the products of "sputtering" ionic? Or can they just be "sucked up" along with the alphas turned into HE? To avoid "poisoning the well" (that's too good an analogy not to use)?
Mike
Could have been pure speculation, but I recall the source seeming to know what they were talking about. Anybody know from whence I'm recalling this quote?
Anyhow, for water cooling... do we then use the heat energy in the water to turn a turbine? Thus capturing some percentage of that 20% of otherwise "lost" energy? And cooling it in the process for reuse?
Um... "regenerative breaking" for a polywell engine? If you will?
I know, I know... "engineering details..."
Are the products of "sputtering" ionic? Or can they just be "sucked up" along with the alphas turned into HE? To avoid "poisoning the well" (that's too good an analogy not to use)?
Mike
Mike Holmes wrote:Oh, now I wish I could recall where I saw a quote, but I can't. Somebody speaking of the Polywell process said that the neutrons produced would be few enough
Hey Mike H. Yes the p + B11 reaction can produce neutrons in side reactions.
Fortunately this need not apply to polywell as evident in this excellent thread
Nferguso i consider the alpha first wall problem largly solved. All one needs to do is find a suitable material that is resistant to alphas. Currently im a fan of Diamond Coating a metal reactor. As evident below diamond will have a low cross section with alphas, we can coat the reactor interior with existing technology (leaving open the tantalising prospect of self healing reactors), and is optically transparent, leaving gammas and x rays to be absorbed by the underling metal structure.
Anyone got any better ideas ?
note this cross section is for "plain" Carbon. Not SP3 Diamond
Purity is Power