saw this on NBF
http://www.nextbigfuture.com/2017/04/co ... lidopinion
Polywell ;Take two?
-
- Posts: 2488
- Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2009 5:53 am
- Location: Third rock from the sun.
Polywell ;Take two?
I am not a nuclear physicist, but play one on the internet.
Re: Polywell ;Take two?
This thread is essentially a duplicate of this one: viewtopic.php?f=10&t=6291
Re: Polywell ;Take two?
This bit of fluff is underwhelming. Another source
https://www.nasa.gov/directorates/space ... ent_Fusion
perhaps clarifies that this is merely an engineering study to determine that if an IEC device can magically achieve its fusion goals, how could it be engineered to meet NASA's dream of a reactor that produces about 2 KW/ Kg energy densities that would be beneficial for spacecraft weight considerations. Some very big assumptions must be applied as a starting point. It has almost nothing to do with the physics necessary/ achievable in such a machine to be a power producer.
A side note is that George Miley has proposed an IEC device as a high efficiency thruster (perhaps competing with more classical ion engines). Optimizing the engineering for best thrust to weight performance may be useful in this situation. But this has nothing to do with power generation. The power would have to come from solar panels or other source.
Dan Tibbets
https://www.nasa.gov/directorates/space ... ent_Fusion
perhaps clarifies that this is merely an engineering study to determine that if an IEC device can magically achieve its fusion goals, how could it be engineered to meet NASA's dream of a reactor that produces about 2 KW/ Kg energy densities that would be beneficial for spacecraft weight considerations. Some very big assumptions must be applied as a starting point. It has almost nothing to do with the physics necessary/ achievable in such a machine to be a power producer.
A side note is that George Miley has proposed an IEC device as a high efficiency thruster (perhaps competing with more classical ion engines). Optimizing the engineering for best thrust to weight performance may be useful in this situation. But this has nothing to do with power generation. The power would have to come from solar panels or other source.
Dan Tibbets
To error is human... and I'm very human.
-
- Posts: 2488
- Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2009 5:53 am
- Location: Third rock from the sun.
Re: Polywell ;Take two?
Its still out there in the wild
https://video.vice.com/en_us/video/outs ... e=vicefbus
polywell in the shed out back.
https://video.vice.com/en_us/video/outs ... e=vicefbus
polywell in the shed out back.
I am not a nuclear physicist, but play one on the internet.
Re: Polywell ;Take two?
Looks more like a Farnsworth device.paperburn1 wrote:Its still out there in the wild
https://video.vice.com/en_us/video/outs ... e=vicefbus
polywell in the shed out back.
The daylight is uncomfortably bright for eyes so long in the dark.
-
- Posts: 2488
- Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2009 5:53 am
- Location: Third rock from the sun.
Re: Polywell ;Take two?
Agreed, I just posted it because this is the first polywell related news I have seen in many weeks. Still waiting for the breakthrough funding announcement.
I am not a nuclear physicist, but play one on the internet.