Q and the future of Nuke Power
Posted: Mon Mar 10, 2008 10:07 pm
Nice article on the problems with fission.
It mentions that the best tokamak so far (JET) has a Q of .65
http://www.monthlyreview.org/080201furb ... lotkin.php
BTW - the pessimism about waste storage is a bit over the top in places. The correct number is given in the article though. - Monitoring for 300 to 600 years - is the correct number.
*
It mentions that the best tokamak so far (JET) has a Q of .65
http://www.monthlyreview.org/080201furb ... lotkin.php
BTW - the pessimism about waste storage is a bit over the top in places. The correct number is given in the article though. - Monitoring for 300 to 600 years - is the correct number.
*