Nuclear regulatory chief Jaczko resigns
Posted: Mon May 21, 2012 3:30 pm
Things are afoot at the NRC:
http://news.yahoo.com/nuclear-regulator ... 54586.html
http://news.yahoo.com/nuclear-regulator ... 54586.html
a discussion forum for Polywell fusion
https://www.talk-polywell.org/bb/
It seem to me the current administration is now starting to support natural gas as the next new solution to our energy problem. After the tarif on solar panels and removing the guy that supported new nuc plants it leave N gas as our next bets bet. Hope this does not filter into the pollywell effort. IMHOkrenshala wrote:There was an unsurprising surprising lack of information in that article. It will definitely be "interesting" to see what falls out of all of it, however.
If by "removing the guy that supported new nuc plants" you mean Jaczko, then I think you are misinformed. Jaczko has consistently done quite literally everything in his power to prevent anything nuclear from happening in the USA. He voted against the new Westinghouse AP1000 reactors in South Carolina. Jaczko has strong political ties to the Liquified Natural Gas industry. His resignation could hardly be due to the natural gas industry, when he has long been their number one supporter through his continuing efforts to suppress nuclear power.paperburn1 wrote:It seem to me the current administration is now starting to support natural gas as the next new solution to our energy problem. After the tarif on solar panels and removing the guy that supported new nuc plants it leave N gas as our next bets bet. Hope this does not filter into the pollywell effort. IMHOkrenshala wrote:There was an unsurprising surprising lack of information in that article. It will definitely be "interesting" to see what falls out of all of it, however.
meh, tone of that article was a bit too biased. While it's most likely true that Jaczko needs to step down. If you're on a 5 man team of any kind, and the other 4 wants you to leave, gives good reasons and support, you gotta go. There's connection to natural gas, but to say that nuclear power (electric power) would all of a sudden make natural gas (chemical power) worthless is a lie.Enginerd wrote:If by "removing the guy that supported new nuc plants" you mean Jaczko, then I think you are misinformed. Jaczko has consistently done quite literally everything in his power to prevent anything nuclear from happening in the USA. He voted against the new Westinghouse AP1000 reactors in South Carolina. Jaczko has strong political ties to the Liquified Natural Gas industry. His resignation could hardly be due to the natural gas industry, when he has long been their number one supporter through his continuing efforts to suppress nuclear power.paperburn1 wrote:It seem to me the current administration is now starting to support natural gas as the next new solution to our energy problem. After the tarif on solar panels and removing the guy that supported new nuc plants it leave N gas as our next bets bet. Hope this does not filter into the pollywell effort. IMHOkrenshala wrote:There was an unsurprising surprising lack of information in that article. It will definitely be "interesting" to see what falls out of all of it, however.