Light Ions for Fast Ignition

Point out news stories, on the net or in mainstream media, related to polywell fusion.

Moderators: tonybarry, MSimon

Post Reply
KitemanSA
Posts: 6188
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 3:05 pm
Location: OlyPen WA

Light Ions for Fast Ignition

Post by KitemanSA »

Why don't they use D&T in their beams. They would be lighter still and fusible too!

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/20 ... 091126.htm

MSimon
Posts: 14335
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:37 pm
Location: Rockford, Illinois
Contact:

Post by MSimon »

Initially, the easiest path for ignition was taken using electrons, but it was soon recognized that numerous problems such as instabilities exists. The next logical step was to use ions, more specifically, protons. Subsequent experiments demonstrated that protons could be accelerated to relevant energies with conversion efficiencies of 5 to 10 percent and they were proposed as an alternative to relativistic electrons. However, the number of protons required for fast ignition is in order of magnitude two times greater than that of light ions that have a conversion efficiency of laser energy into ions of up to 25 percent.
Engineering is the art of making what you want from what you can get at a profit.

KitemanSA
Posts: 6188
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 3:05 pm
Location: OlyPen WA

Post by KitemanSA »

MSimon wrote:
Initially, the easiest path for ignition was taken using electrons, but it was soon recognized that numerous problems such as instabilities exists. The next logical step was to use ions, more specifically, protons. Subsequent experiments demonstrated that protons could be accelerated to relevant energies with conversion efficiencies of 5 to 10 percent and they were proposed as an alternative to relativistic electrons. However, the number of protons required for fast ignition is in order of magnitude two times greater than that of light ions that have a conversion efficiency of laser energy into ions of up to 25 percent.
Yup, and with the proper isotope of Li, I can see it adding to the fuel load, maybe. But carbon, not so much. Between the Li and the proton (VERY low reactivity) is D&T. Should have better conversion efficiencies than protons and should add to the fuel load nicely. Hmmm.
Maybe not. Just a thought.

rcain
Posts: 992
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2008 2:43 pm
Contact:

Post by rcain »

..maybe the above + http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/20 ... 181356.htm (Ultra-Dense Deuterium) - from some while ago.

both these areas fascinating. hope this research accelerates. (pardon the pun).

Post Reply