MIT claim they will build the SPARC

Point out news stories, on the net or in mainstream media, related to polywell fusion.

Moderators: tonybarry, MSimon

Carl White
Posts: 517
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 10:44 pm

Re: MIT claim they will build the SPARC

Post by Carl White »

A look into the site where SPARC will soon sit, as the construction crew makes progress every day inside our Tokamak Hall.
Image

crowberry
Posts: 717
Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2013 6:34 am

Re: MIT claim they will build the SPARC

Post by crowberry »

The CFS project Commercial fusion power on a decadal timescale with the compact, high-field ARC power plant was awarded a grant from the DOE $46 Million Milestone-Based Fusion Development programme. The CFS press release on this topic mentions what they will be doing with the funding:
CFS milestones include manufacturing and testing its first fusion magnet for SPARC, launching a fusion community benefits program that includes strong commitments to diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility (DEIA) and energy justice (EJ) as part of that process, developing the design and technology roadmap for CFS’ first commercial fusion power plant, and submitting its ARC physics basis papers.
https://cfs.energy/news-and-media/cfs-d ... nt-program

usesbiggerwords
Posts: 57
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2021 7:20 pm

Re: MIT claim they will build the SPARC

Post by usesbiggerwords »

launching a fusion community benefits program that includes strong commitments to diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility (DEIA) and energy justice (EJ) as part of that process
These are dollars that could be spent doing, you know, actual fusion. I have less confidence now about this project.

mvanwink5
Posts: 2188
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 5:07 am
Location: N.C. Mountains

Re: MIT claim they will build the SPARC

Post by mvanwink5 »

As if words can bend reality, these political fools put the word 'Justice' into everything. Right out of the 1984 playbook, turning fiction into harsh, gas lighting life. Gag. CFS is a Gates Grift platform.
Counting the days to commercial fusion. It is not that long now.

crowberry
Posts: 717
Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2013 6:34 am

Re: MIT claim they will build the SPARC

Post by crowberry »

The dollars will undoubteldy be spent on the SPARC magnets and on the ARC development work. A diverse workforce is good so that they have access to a broad range of talent. A policy like that will not cost extra.

sd_matt
Posts: 37
Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 10:55 pm

Re: MIT claim they will build the SPARC

Post by sd_matt »

No.

The proper way to do this is expand equality of opportunity through reforming the public school system, putting the kaibash on the university tuition price gouging and so on.

DEI, race quotas, affirmative action and the like are a tacit admission of the utter failure and or lack of will to commmit to meaningful education reform.

DEI is just some power grab one has to sieg heil to and amounts to the Soviet Navy's political officers. It is just as revolting to me as Christian fundamentalist psudoscience but way more pernicious.

Carl White
Posts: 517
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 10:44 pm

Re: MIT claim they will build the SPARC

Post by Carl White »

Assembling the bridge cranes. The people and vehicles there give a sense of scale:

Image

usesbiggerwords
Posts: 57
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2021 7:20 pm

Re: MIT claim they will build the SPARC

Post by usesbiggerwords »

Dr. Whyte was on Jordan Peterson's podcast

https://youtu.be/Ftnt7KoRTIk?feature=shared

ladajo
Posts: 6266
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 11:18 pm
Location: North East Coast

Re: MIT claim they will build the SPARC

Post by ladajo »

I gotta say, I too hope they keep the silly populist politics out of the project's reality and just focus on science. You couldn't be more DEI if you did.
In other news, that is a big hole!
The development of atomic power, though it could confer unimaginable blessings on mankind, is something that is dreaded by the owners of coal mines and oil wells. (Hazlitt)
What I want to do is to look up C. . . . I call him the Forgotten Man. (Sumner)

Carl White
Posts: 517
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 10:44 pm

Re: MIT claim they will build the SPARC

Post by Carl White »

"Tests show high-temperature superconducting magnets are ready for fusion"

Detailed study of magnets built by MIT and Commonwealth Fusion Systems confirms they meet requirements for an economic, compact fusion power plant.

https://news.mit.edu/2024/tests-show-hi ... ready-0304
One of the dramatic innovations, which had many others in the field skeptical of its chances of success, was the elimination of insulation around the thin, flat ribbons of superconducting tape that formed the magnet. Like virtually all electrical wires, conventional superconducting magnets are fully protected by insulating material to prevent short-circuits between the wires. But in the new magnet, the tape was left completely bare; the engineers relied on REBCO’s much greater conductivity to keep the current flowing through the material.

ladajo
Posts: 6266
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 11:18 pm
Location: North East Coast

Re: MIT claim they will build the SPARC

Post by ladajo »

Now that is interesting.
Lots of thoughts circulating in my mind seeking cohesion, direction, and purpose.
Kind of like an uninsulated coil of wire.
The development of atomic power, though it could confer unimaginable blessings on mankind, is something that is dreaded by the owners of coal mines and oil wells. (Hazlitt)
What I want to do is to look up C. . . . I call him the Forgotten Man. (Sumner)

crowberry
Posts: 717
Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2013 6:34 am

Re: MIT claim they will build the SPARC

Post by crowberry »

CFS has announced the following:
This month, CFS received a broad-scope radioactive materials license from the Commonwealth of Massachusetts for our SPARC fusion machine. By showing we’ve equipped ourselves with the people and procedures to safely handle and store these materials, we’ve taken a big step ahead on the path toward operating SPARC.

Skipjack
Posts: 6895
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 2:29 pm

Re: MIT claim they will build the SPARC

Post by Skipjack »

One of the dramatic innovations, which had many others in the field skeptical of its chances of success, was the elimination of insulation around the thin, flat ribbons of superconducting tape that formed the magnet. Like virtually all electrical wires, conventional superconducting magnets are fully protected by insulating material to prevent short-circuits between the wires. But in the new magnet, the tape was left completely bare; the engineers relied on REBCO’s much greater conductivity to keep the current flowing through the material.
[/quote]

I believe that Tokamak Energy was doing the same thing.

crowberry
Posts: 717
Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2013 6:34 am

Re: MIT claim they will build the SPARC

Post by crowberry »

CFS has developed a second type of new superconducting magnets for their needs::

Commonwealth Fusion Systems’ second breakthrough superconducting technology handles mammoth pulses of power
https://www.cfs.energy/news-and-media/c ... s-of-power

The CFS SPARC Q>1 schedule has slipped again. The new target year for Q>1 is 2027.
Inside a fusion energy facility
While there’s still very little tokamak in the tokamak hall right now, Commonwealth has an ambitious timeline planned: The goal is to have SPARC running and the first plasma in the reactor by 2026. The company plans to demonstrate that it can produce more energy in the reactor than is needed to power it (a milestone known as Q>1 in the fusion world) by 2027.

When we published our 2022 story on Commonwealth, the plan was to flip on the reactor and reach the Q>1 milestone by 2025, so the timeline has slipped. It’s not uncommon for big projects in virtually every industry to take longer than expected.
https://www.technologyreview.com/2024/1 ... -facility/

Skipjack
Posts: 6895
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 2:29 pm

Re: MIT claim they will build the SPARC

Post by Skipjack »

To be fair, everyone has seen delays. This is not uncommon with large engineering projects. Helion has seen delays too, mostly due to supply problems and the need to build more in-house. I am sure CFS experienced the same if not worse with their much more complex machine and need for a lot of HTSC tape. While I wished it was not so, I am not really holding that against someone.

Post Reply