
Of course, by continuing to follow the thread, presumably he continues to feed the trolls.

Parallel,parallel wrote:Kiteman,
I see nothing has changed: just more of the usual crap.
When trolls like ladajo strongly push what are demonstrably incorrect statements, you know they are either idiots or liars. Take your pick.
PB1,paperburn1 wrote:His address in Florida of his "Factory" is an apartment building with no business listed or permits to operate listed for him in that area. On that fact alone I am very suspicious of him. Been there did not see it. may have missed it but I don't think so.
It is kind of addictive, following the thread I mean. Feeding the trolls to, also, sometimes!Ivy Matt wrote:You two are misrepresenting Parallel's words. He clearly said that he had quit following this thread, not that he would quit following it, permanently. You can't know that he didn't quit following the thread, for some period of time.
Of course, by continuing to follow the thread, presumably he continues to feed the trolls.
And my main sourc eof annoyance is that it also doesn't look good for the entire LENR community--or to put it differently considering the articles in popular mechanics and other mainstream sources, its more likely people have heard of the e-cat and rossi and are forming their opinions about the general field of LENR about it than other, more responsible groups.Skipjack wrote:I have to agree with ladajo here. It does not look good for Rossi.
Which is why Krivit is so against Rossi. He thinks that Rossi is harming the entire field.And my main sourc eof annoyance is that it also doesn't look good for the entire LENR community--or to put it differently considering the articles in popular mechanics and other mainstream sources, its more likely people have heard of the e-cat and rossi and are forming their opinions about the general field of LENR about it than other, more responsible groups.
It's good to keep in mind that after all these years with questionable results, NASA has only just recently begun serious investigation. According to their Chief Scientist at Langley, Dr. Dennis Bushnell; there is sufficient evidence spread across the field to warrant a real investigation, so that's what they're doing.cgray45 wrote:And my main sourc eof annoyance is that it also doesn't look good for the entire LENR community. . .
That is good work, and it looks like they will get to the bottom of what's happening here.
I agree! Still it is kinda sad that it does all seem to come down to measurement error (which is what I have been saying was a possibility for Celani and the others that had low watt or milliwatt excess heat).That is good work, and it looks like they will get to the bottom of what's happening here.
It illustrates the problem with LENR positives. They are all indirect measurements, and there can easily be unexpected errors as here.
And, less forgivably, the LENR researchers do not themselves do this investigation or possible errors.
It is great that in this case public replication seems to be doing that.
These posters, which you think can't distinguish between fact and opinion, are not acting in a vacuum of individual morsels of information, each of which needs to be proven fact before reaching the conclusion that "a IS b".JoeP wrote:Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts.
I can grok Kiteman's frustration on this general point. Often in this thread, you read a poster make an inference or even a reasonable assumption without certainty, and incorrectly display them as a fact. "a IS b" when it is not warranted.
He proudly thinks he is outwitting everyone even though all he is doing is stating what was dismissed as obvious by everyone else.It is kind of addictive, following the thread I mean. Feeding the trolls to, also, sometimes!