Lawaranceville E-Newsletter
Here we go again...
I actually agree with you, thus in my submission above about the main debate.
I think that there are two parts to it, some desire by EMC2 to protect propriety, and some desire by ONR to protect funding and also control of the project.
So far ONR is doing a fantastic job keeping EMC2 under the table, many normal visibility chains have been closed (some for a while).

I actually agree with you, thus in my submission above about the main debate.
I think that there are two parts to it, some desire by EMC2 to protect propriety, and some desire by ONR to protect funding and also control of the project.
So far ONR is doing a fantastic job keeping EMC2 under the table, many normal visibility chains have been closed (some for a while).
... or lack thereof.krenshala wrote:At this point I think this may be a good thing, overall, for EMC2's development/testing of the Polywell. In six months, however, my opinion might change, pending new information.

Help Keep the Planet Green! Maximize your CO2 and CH4 Output!
Global Warming = More Life. Global Cooling = More Death.
Global Warming = More Life. Global Cooling = More Death.
There is a series of videos covering the New Jersey LPPX meeting in December. Some interesting information included .
http://focusfusion.org/index.php/site/a ... le_online/
Dan Tibbets
http://focusfusion.org/index.php/site/a ... le_online/
Dan Tibbets
To error is human... and I'm very human.
More news, again!
First, a rather detailed writeup by proud New Jersians, glad to have something better than a sleazoid TV show to be famous for:
http://caldwells.thejerseytomatopress.c ... story,6110
And, as mentioned, a PR journal acceptance at JOFE, and another submitted to PRL.
And the "Ruggedization" of the switches proceeds apace
:
http://focusfusion.org/index.php/site/a ... edization/
A tungsten sparking rod core for the switches, looks about 5X the diameter of the existing one. Will require a redrill and insulation rebuild for the switches. But likely with overbuild margin to handle 45kV (the mfr had promised that originally, but the h/w could only actually handle 25
).
http://caldwells.thejerseytomatopress.c ... story,6110
And, as mentioned, a PR journal acceptance at JOFE, and another submitted to PRL.
And the "Ruggedization" of the switches proceeds apace

http://focusfusion.org/index.php/site/a ... edization/
A tungsten sparking rod core for the switches, looks about 5X the diameter of the existing one. Will require a redrill and insulation rebuild for the switches. But likely with overbuild margin to handle 45kV (the mfr had promised that originally, but the h/w could only actually handle 25

Help Keep the Planet Green! Maximize your CO2 and CH4 Output!
Global Warming = More Life. Global Cooling = More Death.
Global Warming = More Life. Global Cooling = More Death.
-
- Posts: 30
- Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 11:23 pm
I see it quite the opposite, if a fusion device is proven as workable...this is going to lead to a Gold Rush opportunity for those already in a solid postion. EMC may be in a position to capitalize on this to a must greater extent than they have aleady-Giorgio wrote:That is true, yet a successfull fusion device might sign the end of the fusion research in other apparatus for quite some time.
A release like this may force EMC to come to the table with more information about their device. For the minute though, I think the secretive tortoise approach is a smart one. Why rush to the public when they have the both the need & opportunity to continue fleshing out WB8+.
Their current funding is solid- No reason to rock the boat unless they find it necessary to keep up with the Joneses (ie. workable alternative device).