UK plans first nuclear fusion power plant

Point out news stories, on the net or in mainstream media, related to polywell fusion.

Moderators: tonybarry, MSimon

Post Reply
mad_derek
Posts: 46
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 4:08 am
Location: UK (mostly)

UK plans first nuclear fusion power plant

Post by mad_derek »

Probably a load of rubbish , but there you go ...

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/s ... 034945.ece
Insanity Rules!

kurt9
Posts: 589
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2007 4:14 pm
Location: Portland, Oregon, USA

Post by kurt9 »

Its a laser-driven ICF concept, with all of the limitations that such concepts have.

mad_derek
Posts: 46
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 4:08 am
Location: UK (mostly)

Post by mad_derek »

kurt9 wrote:Its a laser-driven ICF concept, with all of the limitations that such concepts have.
Ummm ... yes just so. I'm just not sure these guys are serious.
Insanity Rules!

Helius
Posts: 465
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 9:48 pm
Location: Syracuse, New York

Post by Helius »

mad_derek wrote:
kurt9 wrote:Its a laser-driven ICF concept, with all of the limitations that such concepts have.
Ummm ... yes just so. I'm just not sure these guys are serious.
They're Absolutely serious. Hiper needs to be checked out. ICF, researched by the NIF might be scale-downable and possibly economic enough for a power plant.

Hopefully you don't have to fry 10 gold nuggets every second, with a 192 beamline laser bank generating 2MJoules / shot. :?

Hiper is to have a compression laser and a separate heating laser; We won't know the parameters until after the NIF experiments are underway.

kurt9
Posts: 589
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2007 4:14 pm
Location: Portland, Oregon, USA

Post by kurt9 »

The HiPER concept is supposed to allow for the use of much less powerful lasers than the NIF. This, in turn, means that much less input power into the lasers is require for successful fusion.

Nonetheless, I remain skeptical of this process.

Post Reply