Army discovers new energy source
Army discovers new energy source
http://www.arl.army.mil/www/default.cfm?article=3036
Spontaneous dissociation of water into hydrogen and oxygen with an aluminum powder nanomaterial. Researchers claim 220 kilowatts worth of power after three minutes of reaction from 1 kilogram of powder.
Spontaneous dissociation of water into hydrogen and oxygen with an aluminum powder nanomaterial. Researchers claim 220 kilowatts worth of power after three minutes of reaction from 1 kilogram of powder.
Re: Army discovers new energy source
Interesting. I wonder how hard it is to make the powder, and what kind of residues are left in the reaction chamber.
This is along the lines of dropping a sodium tab into water.
This is along the lines of dropping a sodium tab into water.
The development of atomic power, though it could confer unimaginable blessings on mankind, is something that is dreaded by the owners of coal mines and oil wells. (Hazlitt)
What I want to do is to look up C. . . . I call him the Forgotten Man. (Sumner)
What I want to do is to look up C. . . . I call him the Forgotten Man. (Sumner)
Re: Army discovers new energy source
That's what I'm thinking. The energy to split water must come from somewhere; the energy necessary to create the nano powder. And the powder will degrade so that there is no net energy gain (e.g. by burning the gasses for example).This is along the lines of dropping a sodium tab into water.
Still, if it real, could be a way to store energy in a chemical and/or mechanical. Like the sodium tab.
Re: Army discovers new energy source
It seems an amazing breakthrough if confirmed.
My only concern it that the article claim 220 KW of ENERGY in less than 3 minutes..... so is not really clear what they really want to say.
I wish they would learn to express ENERGY and POWER in a proper and correct way when writing such articles.
It would make reading more enjoyable and rise less doubts.
Let's wait till the first scientific paper release, it will hopefully clear any doubts and maybe also give some cost indication on the production of 1 kg of this stuff.
My only concern it that the article claim 220 KW of ENERGY in less than 3 minutes..... so is not really clear what they really want to say.
I wish they would learn to express ENERGY and POWER in a proper and correct way when writing such articles.
It would make reading more enjoyable and rise less doubts.
Let's wait till the first scientific paper release, it will hopefully clear any doubts and maybe also give some cost indication on the production of 1 kg of this stuff.
A society of dogmas is a dead society.
-
- Posts: 2488
- Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2009 5:53 am
- Location: Third rock from the sun.
Re: Army discovers new energy source
Who cares about net plus energy,It would make a a heck of a battery
I am not a nuclear physicist, but play one on the internet.
Re: Army discovers new energy source
At 1.2kw/sec, it would be a really hot battery!
The development of atomic power, though it could confer unimaginable blessings on mankind, is something that is dreaded by the owners of coal mines and oil wells. (Hazlitt)
What I want to do is to look up C. . . . I call him the Forgotten Man. (Sumner)
What I want to do is to look up C. . . . I call him the Forgotten Man. (Sumner)
Re: Army discovers new energy source
I wonder if this would be something where combining thermal-to-electric, in addition to the fuel-cell nature, would be worthwhile. The article states its an exothermic reaction, and one part says not a catalyst (which implies O2 is getting bound up in the Al powder) but another part mentions recombining the H2 and O2 (which implies the Al powder is a catalyst).
Of course it was written by PA, and talks about water being made up of two molecules of hydrogen and one of oxygen ... so any details need to be taken with at least a grain of salt, apparently.
Of course it was written by PA, and talks about water being made up of two molecules of hydrogen and one of oxygen ... so any details need to be taken with at least a grain of salt, apparently.
Re: Army discovers new energy source
Hence my question on the reaction's residue. Too little information at this point to really understand what they have. Piques the interest though.one part says not a catalyst (which implies O2 is getting bound up in the Al powder) but another part mentions recombining the H2 and O2 (which implies the Al powder is a catalyst)
The development of atomic power, though it could confer unimaginable blessings on mankind, is something that is dreaded by the owners of coal mines and oil wells. (Hazlitt)
What I want to do is to look up C. . . . I call him the Forgotten Man. (Sumner)
What I want to do is to look up C. . . . I call him the Forgotten Man. (Sumner)
Re: Army discovers new energy source
I am pretty sure that the O2 is bonded to the Al2 to form Al2O3 powder and leave a pure H2 stream, else you would have a gas mixture of O2 and H2 with little to no practical use.
When they mention that the H2 recombine with the O2 to form H2O they mean that this happens into the fuel cell where the O2 is supplied from air.
When they mention that the H2 recombine with the O2 to form H2O they mean that this happens into the fuel cell where the O2 is supplied from air.
A society of dogmas is a dead society.
Re: Army discovers new energy source
- Aluminum - Air fuel cells were being researched back in the 1970s. What I recall of semi-technical articles from the time, they used aluminum plates which needed to be replaced once consumed.
- Except for the properties of the adhering oxide, aluminum would react with water much like sodium. A fine aluminum powder made under conditions that prevented the oxide from forming on the exposed metal could react near explosively when introduced to water. This same powder would spontaneously rapidly combust on exposure to air, making it a dense but dangerous chemical energy source.
- Except for the properties of the adhering oxide, aluminum would react with water much like sodium. A fine aluminum powder made under conditions that prevented the oxide from forming on the exposed metal could react near explosively when introduced to water. This same powder would spontaneously rapidly combust on exposure to air, making it a dense but dangerous chemical energy source.
The daylight is uncomfortably bright for eyes so long in the dark.
-
- Posts: 815
- Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2008 4:03 pm
- Location: UK
Re: Army discovers new energy source
They're lucky they didn't injure themselves...
Shandong to Dead Workers: Blame Yourselves.
and even this:
Twin Towers brought down by molten aluminum, says scientist
Shandong to Dead Workers: Blame Yourselves.
and even this:
Twin Towers brought down by molten aluminum, says scientist
Ars artis est celare artem.