Recovery.Gov Project Tracker

hanelyp · Post by **hanelyp** » Mon Mar 24, 2014 3:54 pm

"Other Administrative Action" could be anything from wrapping up paperwork and properly archiving and "disposal" of equipment, to putting pieces in order for a scientific net gain demonstrator.

mvanwink5 · Post by **mvanwink5** » Mon Mar 24, 2014 4:36 pm

What is the point of the report when it doesn't say anything?

ScottL · Post by **ScottL** » Mon Mar 24, 2014 9:43 pm

mvanwink5 wrote:What is the point of the report when it doesn't say anything?

Placeholders....

KitemanSA · Post by **KitemanSA** » Sun Mar 30, 2014 8:54 pm

mvanwink5 wrote:What is the point of the report when it doesn't say anything?

Just because YOU don't know what it says, doesn't mean the NAVY doesn't.

mvanwink5 · Post by **mvanwink5** » Sun Mar 30, 2014 9:32 pm

KitemanSA, that is likely the case.

ladajo · Post by **ladajo** » Sun Mar 30, 2014 10:27 pm

Well, I am sure that someone knows exactly what is going on.

DeltaV · Post by **DeltaV** » Tue Apr 08, 2014 4:56 pm

I was scouring the web for a reason why "Energy/Matter Conversion Corporation" no longer appears in Bing Maps or Google Maps.

Then I found this:

Either it's a meteorite, or the Luna Farside Facility was not secure enough for Polywell QED-ARC testing, in which case they forgot to coordinate with the civilian side.

paperburn1 · Post by **paperburn1** » Tue Apr 08, 2014 5:37 pm

It is only visible on one of the two cameras facing that way. most likely an artifact of the CCD.

DeltaV · Post by **DeltaV** » Thu Apr 10, 2014 4:41 pm

paperburn1 wrote:It is only visible on one of the two cameras facing that way. most likely an artifact of the CCD.

That could just mean it was a very brief flash and the scan times were slightly different.

paperburn1 · Post by **paperburn1** » Thu Apr 10, 2014 5:25 pm

DeltaV wrote:
paperburn1 wrote:It is only visible on one of the two cameras facing that way. most likely an artifact of the CCD.
That could just mean it was a very brief flash and the scan times were slightly different.

possible, just not probable

DeltaV · Post by **DeltaV** » Sun Apr 13, 2014 7:37 pm

It happened twice in two days, April 2 and 3. Both times from the top of the ridge, near the same time of day (the other camera was blocked during the first occurence).

What are the odds of that if it was cosmic rays? Reflecting object (JPL says "rock"). Or QED-ARC test.

http://www.nbcnews.com/science/space/na ... ink-n74931

(Thread drift? On Talk-Polywell? Pfaaahh!)

paperburn1 · Post by **paperburn1** » Sun Apr 13, 2014 8:09 pm

Now you have my attention

DeltaV · Post by **DeltaV** » Sun Apr 13, 2014 11:58 pm

So, will my tax dollars be used to drive the 175 yds to check out this glinty thing?

paperburn1 · Post by **paperburn1** » Mon Apr 14, 2014 8:38 am

Nope, the logistics of driving that far are not acceptable. The average move in distance for a day going flat out pedal to the metal is 100 yards.
It would be easyer just to keep on course and look back later to see if things changed. Sad but true.
http://marsrover.nasa.gov/mission/tl_surface_nav.html

JohnFul · Post by **JohnFul** » Tue Apr 15, 2014 3:08 am

"It would be easyer just to keep on course and look back later to see if things changed. Sad but true."

Now that last part "sad but true" is a statement that has applied way too frequently in America since January 2009... Sad, but true.

Sigh

Talk-Polywell.org

Recovery.Gov Project Tracker

Re: Recovery.Gov Project Tracker

Re: Recovery.Gov Project Tracker

Re: Recovery.Gov Project Tracker

Re: Recovery.Gov Project Tracker

Re: Recovery.Gov Project Tracker

Re: Recovery.Gov Project Tracker

Re: Recovery.Gov Project Tracker

Re: Recovery.Gov Project Tracker

Re: Recovery.Gov Project Tracker

Re: Recovery.Gov Project Tracker

Re: Recovery.Gov Project Tracker

Re: Recovery.Gov Project Tracker

Re: Recovery.Gov Project Tracker

Re: Recovery.Gov Project Tracker

Re: Recovery.Gov Project Tracker