Talk-Polywell.org

As far as I can understand, the Relativism invented the Photon concept for explaining how the Light propagate in the outer space (aether) as a particle and Not as an electromagnetic wave, and again seems to forget that the other electromagnetic waves propagate in metallic wires, waveguides, heavy wa...

I am not an expert in particles accelerator, but I believe that the charged particles cause motion of electric charges producing a deceleration force that could affect the measurements at high velocities. It is known that a neutral object, like a neutron, have low probability of be stopped by magnet...

In my opinion, the Relativism seems to be so focused on Photons and forgot that Light is an Electromagnetic Wave (EM). How to prove that is possible be faster than an EM? EM has an absence of acceleration. The EM is slowed down by capacitances in a wave guide, also in a metallic wire. In fact, an EM...

tridimensional injection After some geometric simulations, a preliminary conclusion is: In a bi-dimensional injection, the electrostatic repulsion diverges the ion paths from the central point. In a three-dimensional injection, the electrostatic repulsion converges the ion paths to the central poin...

I had done some reading, and I found a lot of contestations like that "Mercury's orbit explained without relativity":
http://www.science-frontiers.com/sf031/sf031p02.htm

Relativism sounds like a belief.
A century and billions spent.
Is there an irrefutable proof for "time dilation", "curved spacetime" and "nothing can travel faster than light"?
Or, are these only dogmas that do not allow contestation?

You are right. E/m=66.03921e12 J/Kg v=SQRT(2E/m) = 11.49254e6 m/s v=SQRT(c^2-[c^3/({E/m}+c^2)]^2) = 11.48622e6 m/s I am not an expert in Relativity. I rely on acceleration (g-force) for generating a gravitational effect in the spacecraft. When the matter is acceleration, the Relativity sounds very s...

Cosmos; The Newtonian physics has no restrictions about the velocity. Only the Theory of Relativity restricts the velocity to speed of light... The Theory of Relativity was not fully proven... I cannot resist the question - who, exactly, fully proved Newtonian physics? If the inference that the the...

MSimon wrote:

cosmos wrote:the "10" come from decaborane (B10H14).

That makes no sense.

The following calculations take decaborane (B10H14) as example:
1H + 11B + 123KeV → 3 4He + 8.68MeV (66 TJ/Kg ≈ 18 GWh/Kg)

decaborane has "10"(1H + 11B)
and a rest of "4"(H)

the "10" come from decaborane (B10H14).

I think your calculations are incorrect. Please show all your steps. In addition you assume all reactions take place in a small core. And how do you prevent divergence? And how do you keep your fuels in the core? How do you get your exhaust gases to go around the bends without hitting the walls ? H...

MSimon wrote:Cosmos,

And how about heat load from undeflected 4He?

The plasma is ionized, there is low probability of it occurs.
If it occurs, there is the heat exchange system for cooling the superconducting magnets.

MSimon wrote:What is the strength required of the magnets in order to prevent 3 to 5 MeV alphas from hitting the walls?

for 3MeV is about 1.2595 Tesla,
I would choose 3 Tesla or higher.

What is the strength required of the magnets in order to prevent 3 to 5 MeV alphas from hitting the walls? depends of specific energy (J/Kg) of the alphas: (eV/Kg) × 1.60218E-19 → (J/Kg) Using the specific energy to find velocity of products from nuclear reaction: E=½mv² → v= ((E/m) × 2)0.5 → v= ((...

JohnP wrote:Cosmos:

Of course. Tinkerers have confounded critics with more formal education before.
All you need to do is build working examples.

I think that most of us have a problem for raising funds to build our working examples.
It is important don't give up.