Talk-Polywell.org Forum Index Talk-Polywell.org
a discussion forum for Polywell fusion
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Carlson and Nebel
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Talk-Polywell.org Forum Index -> Theory
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
TallDave



Joined: 25 Jul 2007
Posts: 2524

PostPosted: Tue Jul 08, 2008 4:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
and the fact that Bussard was confused about the dramatic difference between electron density and neutral density


Nah, I think that was just a typo. In one place he talks about neutral density and ionization, in another he has an incomplete sentence about electron density ratios and arcing. He probably just mis-pasted his parenthetical.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but both neutral and electron density would presumably affect arcing.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Art Carlson



Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Posts: 794
Location: Munich, Germany

PostPosted: Tue Jul 08, 2008 4:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

TallDave wrote:
Quote:
and the fact that Bussard was confused about the dramatic difference between electron density and neutral density

Nah, I think that was just a typo. In one place he talks about neutral density and ionization, in another he has an incomplete sentence about electron density ratios and arcing. He probably just mis-pasted his parenthetical.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but both neutral and electron density would presumably affect arcing.

Given full liberty to assume typos, can you paste together a coherent and plausible picture of the relationship between cusp confinement, recirculation, and arcing?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
MSimon



Joined: 16 Jul 2007
Posts: 8780
Location: Rockford, Illinois

PostPosted: Tue Jul 08, 2008 4:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Art Carlson wrote:
TallDave wrote:
Quote:
and the fact that Bussard was confused about the dramatic difference between electron density and neutral density

Nah, I think that was just a typo. In one place he talks about neutral density and ionization, in another he has an incomplete sentence about electron density ratios and arcing. He probably just mis-pasted his parenthetical.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but both neutral and electron density would presumably affect arcing.

Given full liberty to assume typos, can you paste together a coherent and plausible picture of the relationship between cusp confinement, recirculation, and arcing?


1. Electron loss is the (first order) dominant energy loss mechanism. It is reduced by:
a. Magnetic confinement
b. Recirculation (Oscillation)

2. Confinement is required to maintain a particle density in the reaction space sufficient to provide useful amounts of energy given the limited density possible outside the reaction space.

What is the reality? I await further results.
_________________
Engineering is the art of making what you want from what you can get at a profit.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
TallDave



Joined: 25 Jul 2007
Posts: 2524

PostPosted: Tue Jul 08, 2008 5:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Art Carlson wrote:
TallDave wrote:
Quote:
and the fact that Bussard was confused about the dramatic difference between electron density and neutral density

Nah, I think that was just a typo. In one place he talks about neutral density and ionization, in another he has an incomplete sentence about electron density ratios and arcing. He probably just mis-pasted his parenthetical.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but both neutral and electron density would presumably affect arcing.

Given full liberty to assume typos, can you paste together a coherent and plausible picture of the relationship between cusp confinement, recirculation, and arcing?


Heh, well I can try.

Cusps are squeezed nearly closed (or at least give a bad angle to electrons trying to leave) at beta = 1, so we get an electron density ratio inside versus outside of 1000:1; the 1/1000th outside are continuously recirculating back inside because the cusps are friendlier to electrons returning. Assuming there aren't too many neutrals floating around, this outside electron density is low enough that no arcing to the wall occurs, while the interior density is high enough for fusion.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Talk-Polywell.org Forum Index -> Theory All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
Page 8 of 8

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group