Talk-Polywell.org

a discussion forum for Polywell fusion
It is currently Thu Aug 28, 2014 9:05 am

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Oct 25, 2012 8:45 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 2:29 pm
Posts: 5160
I had not seen this article before. It does sound quite encouraging and seems to confirm a lot of John Slough's prior work.
I need more time to read it in full detail though:

Shortened Url


Last edited by Skipjack on Tue Oct 30, 2012 10:31 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 25, 2012 8:51 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 2:29 pm
Posts: 5160
Here is another article coauthored by Tri Alpha, but it is behind a paywall. The short summary does look very interesting (and encouraging) though:
http://prl.aps.org/abstract/PRL/v108/i25/e255008


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 29, 2012 2:01 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2007 5:36 pm
Posts: 105
Location: Nikaloukta
Recent Tri-Alpha presentation

http://www.google.se/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=f ... DdoTHd1zHA


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 29, 2012 3:09 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 2:29 pm
Posts: 5160
Very cool! Great find! Thanks for sharing!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 29, 2012 5:20 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 5:05 am
Posts: 1918
The best part (for engineers):
Quote:
Our discovery of TWO high energy α-particles is having a huge impact on the reactor design. They are much easier to extract and convert more efficiently into electricity.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 29, 2012 5:34 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2007 5:36 pm
Posts: 105
Location: Nikaloukta
Quote:
Very cool! Great find! Thanks for sharing!


I cannot say I understand much of it.

Any qualified comments? I guess there is no common agreement that this is the way, the truth and the life.

Otherwise there would be ample resources directed to this.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 29, 2012 8:07 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2007 5:02 am
Posts: 1827
Location: Vancouver, Canada
The part I picked up on is 'construction of the 100MW reactor is underway.'

_________________
CHoff


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 29, 2012 10:47 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 2:29 pm
Posts: 5160
Quote:
The part I picked up on is 'construction of the 100MW reactor is underway.

Well since this is Tri Alpha and they are fully funded (from what I understand), this is really good news. I have a feeling that this method for nuclear fusion will soon gather a lot more interest.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 30, 2012 6:14 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 8:13 pm
Posts: 219
Skipjack wrote:
Well since this is Tri Alpha and they are fully funded (from what I understand), this is really good news. I have a feeling that this method for nuclear fusion will soon gather a lot more interest.


Well, I could be mistaken but I don't think there's anything much
in that article that wasn't already out in the wild.

The only things that stand out to me are the statement about design
changes for the alpha conversion and the overall assertion that T-A
is still going for aneutronic.

... which would scotch certain rumors that T-A had changed
course for neutronic fuels...

edit: ... had any one else heard about that?


Last edited by zapkitty on Tue Oct 30, 2012 6:20 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 30, 2012 6:15 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2007 5:02 am
Posts: 1827
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Sorry, that was 'design is underway' not construction, but here's hoping.

_________________
CHoff


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 30, 2012 12:04 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 2:29 pm
Posts: 5160
well, since this is not ITER, there is hope that the design and construction wont take decades ;)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 30, 2012 5:55 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 6:52 am
Posts: 2331
I have wondered howmuch hardware Tri- Alpha has built, as opposed to computer modeling. This shows that they at least have a reactor that is capable of producing a few measurable P-B11 fusion events.

The resance peak at ~ 600 KeV is consistant with published cross sections=

http://iec.neep.wisc.edu/operation.php

The information is confusing about the energy of the two alphas from the excited Beryllium 8, and the C12 breakdown that also produces one of the alphas is barely mentioned except for one graphic, which is interesting as it seems to show the third alpha as having lower energy (?).

The point of only a few energy ranges needing to be accommodated reenforces what has already been stressed for direct conversion. Compared to D-D fusion with outcomes of a high energy pr oton, tritium, He3 at different energies is more challenging to convert,and this at most accounts for ~ 50% of the aviable energy- the rest is carried by a neutron).

The target of 600 KeV for center of mass energies to produce the most fusion, may not reflect the best target. Since this is a peak, it means the cross section is leveling off, which means little gain in this area. The Bremsstruhlung radiation continues to rise exponentially, so actual gain may be negative. This may be reflected by Bussard's target of ~ 400 KeV center of mass kinetic energy target. It is on the steep up slope of the fusion cross section curve, and the Bremsstruhlung is less (perhaps ~ 40% as much. There is some sweet spot where the two competing effects has the most beneficial solution.

I, of course, hope that the plasma thermalization can be controlled to such an extent that the resonance peak at ~ 120 KeV can be used. Almost as much fusion (fusion numbers multiplied by the difference between the fuel KE, and the fusion products KE) and only ~ 10% as much Bremsstruhlung.

As a side point, This Bremsstruhlung vs the fusion cross section slope is why ideas of pushing D-D fusion up to ~ 1 MeV is counter productive. The fusion cross section slope is increasing , but at a shallow angle, while the Bremsstruhlung continues to also increase at an exponential rate (~T^1.75). There is also a sweat spot for this reaction, which according to Bussard seems to be at ~ 80-100 KeV.
Note that the MFP at the working densities and energies and machine radius is also an important considerations if annealing is considered in The Polywell.

Dan Tibbets

_________________
To error is human... and I'm very human.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 13, 2012 9:21 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2007 5:36 pm
Posts: 105
Location: Nikaloukta
Are those numbers of any significance?

Quote:
The FRC confinement times are improved by factors 2 to 4, and the plasma lifetimes are extended from 1 to up to 4 ms.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group