Interesting article on FRCs

Point out news stories, on the net or in mainstream media, related to polywell fusion.

Moderators: tonybarry, MSimon

Skipjack
Posts: 5568
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 2:29 pm

Interesting article on FRCs

Postby Skipjack » Thu Oct 25, 2012 8:45 pm

I had not seen this article before. It does sound quite encouraging and seems to confirm a lot of John Slough's prior work.
I need more time to read it in full detail though:

Shortened Url
Last edited by Skipjack on Tue Oct 30, 2012 10:31 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Skipjack
Posts: 5568
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 2:29 pm

Postby Skipjack » Thu Oct 25, 2012 8:51 pm

Here is another article coauthored by Tri Alpha, but it is behind a paywall. The short summary does look very interesting (and encouraging) though:
http://prl.aps.org/abstract/PRL/v108/i25/e255008

Munchausen
Posts: 108
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2007 5:36 pm
Location: Nikaloukta

Postby Munchausen » Mon Oct 29, 2012 2:01 am


Skipjack
Posts: 5568
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 2:29 pm

Postby Skipjack » Mon Oct 29, 2012 3:09 am

Very cool! Great find! Thanks for sharing!

DeltaV
Posts: 2190
Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 5:05 am

Postby DeltaV » Mon Oct 29, 2012 5:20 am

The best part (for engineers):
Our discovery of TWO high energy α-particles is having a huge impact on the reactor design. They are much easier to extract and convert more efficiently into electricity.

Munchausen
Posts: 108
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2007 5:36 pm
Location: Nikaloukta

Postby Munchausen » Mon Oct 29, 2012 5:34 pm

Very cool! Great find! Thanks for sharing!


I cannot say I understand much of it.

Any qualified comments? I guess there is no common agreement that this is the way, the truth and the life.

Otherwise there would be ample resources directed to this.

choff
Posts: 2145
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2007 5:02 am
Location: Vancouver, Canada

Postby choff » Mon Oct 29, 2012 8:07 pm

The part I picked up on is 'construction of the 100MW reactor is underway.'
CHoff

Skipjack
Posts: 5568
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 2:29 pm

Postby Skipjack » Mon Oct 29, 2012 10:47 pm

The part I picked up on is 'construction of the 100MW reactor is underway.

Well since this is Tri Alpha and they are fully funded (from what I understand), this is really good news. I have a feeling that this method for nuclear fusion will soon gather a lot more interest.

zapkitty
Posts: 241
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 8:13 pm

Postby zapkitty » Tue Oct 30, 2012 6:14 am

Skipjack wrote:Well since this is Tri Alpha and they are fully funded (from what I understand), this is really good news. I have a feeling that this method for nuclear fusion will soon gather a lot more interest.


Well, I could be mistaken but I don't think there's anything much
in that article that wasn't already out in the wild.

The only things that stand out to me are the statement about design
changes for the alpha conversion and the overall assertion that T-A
is still going for aneutronic.

... which would scotch certain rumors that T-A had changed
course for neutronic fuels...

edit: ... had any one else heard about that?
Last edited by zapkitty on Tue Oct 30, 2012 6:20 am, edited 1 time in total.

choff
Posts: 2145
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2007 5:02 am
Location: Vancouver, Canada

Postby choff » Tue Oct 30, 2012 6:15 am

Sorry, that was 'design is underway' not construction, but here's hoping.
CHoff

Skipjack
Posts: 5568
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 2:29 pm

Postby Skipjack » Tue Oct 30, 2012 12:04 pm

well, since this is not ITER, there is hope that the design and construction wont take decades ;)

D Tibbets
Posts: 2691
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 6:52 am

Postby D Tibbets » Tue Oct 30, 2012 5:55 pm

I have wondered howmuch hardware Tri- Alpha has built, as opposed to computer modeling. This shows that they at least have a reactor that is capable of producing a few measurable P-B11 fusion events.

The resance peak at ~ 600 KeV is consistant with published cross sections=

http://iec.neep.wisc.edu/operation.php

The information is confusing about the energy of the two alphas from the excited Beryllium 8, and the C12 breakdown that also produces one of the alphas is barely mentioned except for one graphic, which is interesting as it seems to show the third alpha as having lower energy (?).

The point of only a few energy ranges needing to be accommodated reenforces what has already been stressed for direct conversion. Compared to D-D fusion with outcomes of a high energy pr oton, tritium, He3 at different energies is more challenging to convert,and this at most accounts for ~ 50% of the aviable energy- the rest is carried by a neutron).

The target of 600 KeV for center of mass energies to produce the most fusion, may not reflect the best target. Since this is a peak, it means the cross section is leveling off, which means little gain in this area. The Bremsstruhlung radiation continues to rise exponentially, so actual gain may be negative. This may be reflected by Bussard's target of ~ 400 KeV center of mass kinetic energy target. It is on the steep up slope of the fusion cross section curve, and the Bremsstruhlung is less (perhaps ~ 40% as much. There is some sweet spot where the two competing effects has the most beneficial solution.

I, of course, hope that the plasma thermalization can be controlled to such an extent that the resonance peak at ~ 120 KeV can be used. Almost as much fusion (fusion numbers multiplied by the difference between the fuel KE, and the fusion products KE) and only ~ 10% as much Bremsstruhlung.

As a side point, This Bremsstruhlung vs the fusion cross section slope is why ideas of pushing D-D fusion up to ~ 1 MeV is counter productive. The fusion cross section slope is increasing , but at a shallow angle, while the Bremsstruhlung continues to also increase at an exponential rate (~T^1.75). There is also a sweat spot for this reaction, which according to Bussard seems to be at ~ 80-100 KeV.
Note that the MFP at the working densities and energies and machine radius is also an important considerations if annealing is considered in The Polywell.

Dan Tibbets
To error is human... and I'm very human.

Munchausen
Posts: 108
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2007 5:36 pm
Location: Nikaloukta

Postby Munchausen » Tue Nov 13, 2012 9:21 pm

Are those numbers of any significance?

The FRC confinement times are improved by factors 2 to 4, and the plasma lifetimes are extended from 1 to up to 4 ms.


Return to “News”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 9 guests