Talk-Polywell.org

a discussion forum for Polywell fusion
It is currently Wed Oct 01, 2014 12:13 pm

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 112 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 8  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Alan Boyle update
PostPosted: Wed May 11, 2011 12:44 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2007 5:02 am
Posts: 1843
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Alan Boyle update

http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/

It turns out Rick Nebel has simply retired.

_________________
CHoff


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 11, 2011 1:16 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat May 01, 2010 6:43 am
Posts: 616
The update contains a lot more than that, including a number of quotes from Jaeyoung Park. Main points:

* The project is behind. Progress is dictated more by funding than by the original timeline.
* The funding will probably last until the end of the year, but by then EMC2 and the Navy should know whether it's worth going forward to the next step.
* Park hopes WB-8 will be the last small-scale experimental machine. I interpret that to mean that they're hoping to go for a demonstration reactor next, or at least a net power device.
* The Navy wants EMC2 to keep most of its progress confidential until they have an actual product to deliver. I suspect this had a bearing on EMC2's response to the FOIA request.
* The Navy is open to EMC2 profiting commercially from a working reactor, as long as the company remains US-owned and doesn't give up control of the technology.

Many questions remain, no doubt. For instance, the role of hydrogen-boron fuel in EMC2's current plans.

_________________
Temperature, density, confinement time: pick any two.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 11, 2011 1:19 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 5:07 am
Posts: 1140
Location: N.C. Mountains
I thought they did a good job of keeping us hanging. On the other hand, Park did say WB-8 is "like driving a Ferrari." Not having driven one, I would take this to mean it has power to spare and requires precision handling. I would have preferred "get ready for Earth to Mars in a month, here we come."

Back to waiting on Christmas...

_________________
Sitting in my internet lawn chair scanning for Area 51 news. Now, where does one store the borax aboard ship?


Last edited by mvanwink5 on Wed May 11, 2011 1:35 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 11, 2011 1:27 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 2:29 pm
Posts: 5162
Thanks, Choff.
That is some interesting news indeed. Though things are still as vague as always. Well, I guess we will have to wait until the end of the year then.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 11, 2011 1:44 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat May 01, 2010 6:43 am
Posts: 616
mvanwink5 wrote:
I would have preferred "get ready for Earth to Mars in a month, here we come."

I don't think the Navy would have appreciated that. :wink:

_________________
Temperature, density, confinement time: pick any two.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Alan Boyle update
PostPosted: Wed May 11, 2011 2:11 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2008 12:10 am
Posts: 336
Location: Madison, WI
Nice to have some real news.

I'm a little confused about the comments that the funding stream is slow. I would have thought they could have drawn the funds as fast as they wanted so long as their milestones were keeping pace with the burn rate. After all, wasn't the concern a while back that the stimulus money wasn't getting out the door fast enough?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 11, 2011 2:41 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2008 2:43 pm
Posts: 991
Ivy Matt wrote:
The update contains a lot more than that, including a number of quotes from Jaeyoung Park. Main points:
...
* The funding will probably last until the end of the year, but by then EMC2 and the Navy should know whether it's worth going forward to the next step.
...


that doesnt sound so hot (put like that at least); they should know the answer to that question already.

we will see.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 11, 2011 3:51 am 
Online

Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 11:18 pm
Posts: 4844
Location: North East Coast
The part that really matters:

Quote:
"This machine should be able to generate 1,000 times more nuclear activity than WB-7, with about eight times more magnetic field," said Park, quoting the publicly available information about WB-8. "We'll call that a good success. That means we're on track with the scaling law."


I just wish we could also confirm the diameter.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 11, 2011 7:11 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2009 6:15 pm
Posts: 2258
Location: Italy
Very interesting news.
I am kinda puzzled by Rick retiring from the company like that.
In all of his messages on this board I have always felt his passion and dedication to this project.
I wonder what happened.

Anyhow, to December is just 7 months, we can wait that .


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 11, 2011 7:14 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue May 06, 2008 11:54 am
Posts: 2117
Sounds consistent with the simplest explanations for the FOIR bouncing: They just want it kept quiet till there's something worth reporting, no evil conspiracies.

On PB-11: it's reported briskly and lightly enough that you can't really read between the lines... There's mention of WB-D possibly being the next step, without explicit mention of Boron.
Quote:
Park figures that the money provided under the WB-8 contract should last until the end of the year, depending on how efficiently the EMC2 team is able to stretch the money out. By then, the engineers in New Mexico and their backers in the Navy should know whether it's worth going ahead with the next step, perhaps even with the big demonstration reactor. Park hopes that WB-8 will be the last small-scale experimental machine EMC2 will have to build.
Though if WB-8 is the last small scale machine, that doesn't leave too many things other than PB11, intermediate to WB-D.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 11, 2011 7:34 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2009 6:15 pm
Posts: 2258
Location: Italy
Looks like I was a little bit too pessimist on the subject..... :oops:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Alan Boyle update
PostPosted: Wed May 11, 2011 9:42 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2009 11:27 am
Posts: 29
Maui wrote:
I'm a little confused about the comments that the funding stream is slow. I would have thought they could have drawn the funds as fast as they wanted so long as their milestones were keeping pace with the burn rate.


To quote from the article:

Quote:
the realities of government funding — including continuing resolutions, shutdown threats and other budgetary snags — have dictated a slower pace


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 11, 2011 9:58 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 5:07 am
Posts: 1140
Location: N.C. Mountains
How reasonable is it that Park would give up his position at Los Alamos for a job that will go away in a year, at age 41? I know I wouldn't do it unless I was sure, I would arm twist Dr. Nebel to hang on a bit until I knew. But that is me. I also surmise that Dr. Nebel only retired when EMC2 reached first plasma, and no one said he is not consulting, and there is WB-D design work.

It also does not look like they will be slow in development once they have the data to go forward:

"If this machine works as we hope it will work, it will probably establish a firm technical foundation," he said. "People may say, 'It's a big jump and you shouldn't be doing this.' But every year that the energy problem doesn't get solved ... costs tens of billions of dollars. Sometimes waiting too long is not a good thing. If you look at the solutions, you might say, 'Can we afford to wait?'"

_________________
Sitting in my internet lawn chair scanning for Area 51 news. Now, where does one store the borax aboard ship?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 11, 2011 12:13 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 3:05 pm
Posts: 5870
Location: OlyPen WA
Betruger wrote:
Though if WB-8 is the last small scale machine, that doesn't leave too many things other than PB11, intermediate to WB-D.
Not quite sure what you mean here. pB&J isn't "intermediate" between WB8 and WB-D, it IS WB8 with some ancilliary mods. They don't need another intermediate scale machine to go pB&J. Just to be clear.

Now Dr. B wanted to do TWO additional small scale machines before going full scale. He wanted to do a "square plane-form" cuboctohedron and a similar icosadodecahedron. Personally, I'd like to see those too.

They aren't much needed for utility power plants, but for ships etc., size matters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 11, 2011 12:27 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 1:23 am
Posts: 1128
Location: Northern Virginia
The unanswered questions for me are ...

Do the proposed mechanisms for minimizing thermalization actually work?

Have they achieved simultaneous control of potential well depth and ion density (i.e the ability to control the virtual anode and thus limit bremsstrahlung)?

I think it is clear that the device is working more or less as predicted. We know the predecessors did make some fusion, and this one must be. The real issue is does it work well enough? That "more or less" could cover several rather significant orders of magnitude.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 112 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 8  Next

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group