Talk-Polywell.org

a discussion forum for Polywell fusion
It is currently Mon Jul 28, 2014 4:12 am

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 739 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43 ... 50  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 03, 2012 11:40 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat May 01, 2010 6:43 am
Posts: 603
True. I'd say the good news for 2011 is that LPP has managed to increase the voltage and the repeatability of their shots and, so far, their predicted power scaling is holding up. The questions about fusion yield with heavier gases and shorter electrodes, and the suppression of Bremsstrahlung with gigagauss magnetic fields, however, remain to be answered—hopefully this year.

_________________
Temperature, density, confinement time: pick any two.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 29, 2012 5:23 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 2:29 pm
Posts: 5083
Meanwhile, some encouraging news from LPP

Quote:
LPP's team received word February 27th that a paper describing our achievement of fusion reactions from ions confined at energies equivalent to over 1.8 billion degrees C was accepted by Physics of Plasmas, "the most highly cited journal devoted fully to plasma physics."


http://www.lawrencevilleplasmaphysics.c ... &Itemid=90


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 29, 2012 6:48 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 5:56 pm
Posts: 207
Location: Southeast US
That is really good news.

I wish this had happened when toks first started getting funding back in the earlier days, but I am so happy that now pB11 fusion competition is happening and seems bright and possible!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 29, 2012 6:37 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 2:29 pm
Posts: 5083
I will be making jumps of joy, if it really works out in the end. Right now, I am just "not unhappy" about it ;)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 01, 2012 4:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2008 4:52 pm
Posts: 1511
Location: London
Ivy Matt wrote:
True. I'd say the good news for 2011 is that LPP has managed to increase the voltage and the repeatability of their shots and, so far, their predicted power scaling is holding up. The questions about fusion yield with heavier gases and shorter electrodes, and the suppression of Bremsstrahlung with gigagauss magnetic fields, however, remain to be answered—hopefully this year.


There were a lot of question marks over Lerner's pet idea. But it is great that some of them have now been removed. I don't think, reading between the lines all the data, that they have any bad news except that maintaining exact symmetry in the electrodes is important.

So as a viable fusion method for power I find it now even more difficult to see how they can acheive feasible electrode lifetime - but not absolutely impossible. For example, you can imagine a system with n pins each adjustable a few mils and a control system that optimises position with each shot to maintain symmetry. Could you not, at least in principle?

As for whether scaling holds, and whether the get-out for Bremmsstrahlung will work, at least we do not I think have a theoretical negative result (if magnetic fields are high enough).


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 01, 2012 6:03 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2009 12:17 pm
Posts: 300
Location: CA
tomclarke wrote:
For example, you can imagine a system with n pins each adjustable a few mils and a control system that optimises position with each shot to maintain symmetry. Could you not, at least in principle?


This should definately be doable with existing technology, at least in relatively cool environments. You would probably need a laser to sense if the position tolerance had been breached. I gather the shot interval will be pretty fast but if the adjustments are not needed too often it should be viable.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2012 12:41 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2010 2:04 pm
Posts: 848
Location: Summerville SC, USA
And slowly rotate the pins to keep a "sharper" edge toward the central electrode.

_________________
“The mind of a bigot is like the pupil of the eye; the more light you pour on it, the more it will contract.”
―Oliver Wendell Holmes

R. Peters


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 3:06 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat May 01, 2010 6:43 am
Posts: 603
May 1st LPP is holding an online seminar hosted by Agrion, a global business community for energy and sustainability. It's at 11:30 AM EDT (UTC-4). You need to register with Agrion to view the seminar live. In order to register, you need some type of corporate e-mail account. They don't accept Yahoo! or Gmail e-mail addresses. The seminar will be broadcast live from the FF-1 facility, and will feature the latest news from the lab as reassembly of FF-1 is completed and new shots are ready to begin.

http://focusfusion.org/index.php/site/a ... may_1_2012

_________________
Temperature, density, confinement time: pick any two.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 03, 2012 8:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat May 01, 2010 6:43 am
Posts: 603
The video of the seminar is now available, but you still have to register with Agrion to view it. However, Agrion has published a PDF of the seminar here. It appears to me to be mostly an investor pitch. Most of the information I've seen before. However, they do give a rather optimistic timeline for proof of scientific feasibility (2012-13) and commercialization (2015-16). I assume the commercialization would depend on proof of scientific feasibility. :wink:

_________________
Temperature, density, confinement time: pick any two.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 20, 2012 12:00 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat May 01, 2010 6:43 am
Posts: 603
I'm not entirely certain what happened last month, but it seems Next Big Future was the first to mention the June update publicly. Perhaps you now have to be subscribed to LPP's newsletter to receive them directly. I thought I was on their mailing list, but as I wasn't sent the June newsletter at the time it was released, I just subscribed at the LPP site, just to make sure.

The main update is on theoretical work possibly explaining results (i.e. higher than expected ion energies) obtained by LPP on FF-1. It contains a link to a paper by an Iranian team, on "ion viscous heating". Lerner believes that this process, combined with the electron beam heating the plasma by induced currents, explains why the ion energies were higher than expected.

The second section is on investigations into resistance leading to a reduction in current in the FF-1 device. As a result of the investigations, it is believed that arcing is accountable for most of the resistance. LPP is taking steps to reduce arcing which, together with the shorter electrodes used for advanced fuels and new switches designed by Raytheon, should help LPP achieve their goal of a current of 2.8 MA.

There is also a section on the serrated-edge tungsten cathode plate that was designed to improve symmetry in the plasma sheath. Unfortunately the cathode plate was chipped at or in transit from the brazing shop, requiring LPP to wait for another turn at their machine shop. According to the June update, LPP expected to begin testing again in early July.

_________________
Temperature, density, confinement time: pick any two.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 25, 2012 2:00 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2009 12:17 pm
Posts: 300
Location: CA
A couple of new posts from LPP:

New theoretical insights explain super-hot plasmoids

http://lawrencevilleplasmaphysics.com/index.php?option=com_lyftenbloggie&view=entry&year=2012&month=07&day=24&id=70:new-theoretical-insights-explain-super-hot-plasmoids&Itemid=90

Resistance measurements show way to higher currents

http://lawrencevilleplasmaphysics.com/index.php?option=com_lyftenbloggie&view=entry&year=2012&month=07&day=24&id=72:resistance-measurements-show-way-to-higher-currents&Itemid=90

They now have a theory to explan higher than predicted experimental temps than they had predicted heretofor. They say it gives them more confidence that they will achieve temps required to eventually burn PB11.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 25, 2012 4:52 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2011 4:30 am
Posts: 2039
Kahuna wrote:
They say it gives them more confidence that they will achieve temps required to eventually burn PB11.
Why you are so naive?
Much easier to achieve temps required to burn DT with Q>1. They can? Answer is "no".


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 25, 2012 5:32 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2009 12:17 pm
Posts: 300
Location: CA
Joseph Chikva wrote:
Kahuna wrote:
They say it gives them more confidence that they will achieve temps required to eventually burn PB11.
Why you are so naive?
Much easier to achieve temps required to burn DT with Q>1. They can? Answer is "no".


Why don't you learn to read english before you polute this blog with more of your ignorant comments. Do even you know what the phrase: "They say" means? If you want to call the LPP team naive, feel free (although I dare say they are much more accomplished than you), but don't confuse reporting with opinion.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 25, 2012 5:54 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2012 3:05 pm
Posts: 33
Joseph Chikva wrote:
Kahuna wrote:
They say it gives them more confidence that they will achieve temps required to eventually burn PB11.
Why you are so naive?
Much easier to achieve temps required to burn DT with Q>1. They can? Answer is "no".


Of course they can't do it. They are trying to achieve pB11 in the future.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 25, 2012 6:04 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2011 4:30 am
Posts: 2039
Kahuna wrote:
Joseph Chikva wrote:
Kahuna wrote:
They say it gives them more confidence that they will achieve temps required to eventually burn PB11.
Why you are so naive?
Much easier to achieve temps required to burn DT with Q>1. They can? Answer is "no".


Why don't you learn to read english before you polute this blog with more of your ignorant comments. Do even you know what the phrase: "They say" means? If you want to call the LPP team naive, feel free (although I dare say they are much more accomplished than you), but don't confuse reporting with opinion.
Thanks, at least I understand what "they say" means. That means that many their words are unbelievable.
What would you say if I'd note you that can beat Mike Tyson, can run 100m faster than 10 sec, can swim 100 m faster than 45 sec, etc?
Not will say that I am liar? As in reality I can beat only much weaker man than Mike, can run 100 m not faster than 12 sec, and swam 100 m at 1 min 1 sec 30 years ago.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 739 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43 ... 50  Next

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group