New Alan Boyle article

Point out news stories, on the net or in mainstream media, related to polywell fusion.

Moderators: tonybarry, MSimon

TallDave
Posts: 3140
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 7:12 pm
Contact:

New Alan Boyle article

Post by TallDave »

http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/archive/ ... 01440.aspx

Not much new here, though.

We do now know for sure that peer review is underway:
Nebel told me that the results of the first-phase test are now being reviewed by the funders and experts in the fusion energy field.
n*kBolt*Te = B**2/(2*mu0) and B^.25 loss scaling? Or not so much? Hopefully we'll know soon...

MSimon
Posts: 14334
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:37 pm
Location: Rockford, Illinois
Contact:

Re: New Alan Boyle article

Post by MSimon »

TallDave wrote:http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/archive/ ... 01440.aspx

Not much new here, though.

We do now know for sure that peer review is underway:
Nebel told me that the results of the first-phase test are now being reviewed by the funders and experts in the fusion energy field.
I have posts up at the usual places and the newsgroup has been notified.
Engineering is the art of making what you want from what you can get at a profit.

Aero
Posts: 1200
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 4:36 am
Location: 92111

Post by Aero »

Well, that's encouraging.

True, there could have been more glowingly encouraging comments, like mother used to make when we were in PeeWee league but then there were none of the "Don't get your hopes up" remarks like older brothers can make, either.

I believe this is the first time I have heard the terminology of Phasing used in relation to the project. That is important because if this is a phased contract it implies that the paperwork is in place, that the money is the only delay. And in fact, the money may already be programmed, just waiting for the go-ahead. Someone who knows about Phased contracts could chime in right about here. :)

All in all, Nebel kept his professional face on and I get the impression that further work will probably be funded, but it is a question of competition for resources and when the money can be programmed in. With the current energy situation, I'd guess sooner rather than later.
Last edited by Aero on Fri Aug 29, 2008 3:29 am, edited 1 time in total.
Aero

just_an_observer
Posts: 21
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2008 1:39 pm

Now that makes me feel good

Post by just_an_observer »

Well looky there!! He did respond to my emails - or rather he was already working on it as it sounds in the article. Anyway, I'm glad he posted an update. I'll have to send him a "thank you" email. So it sounds like good news - Otherwise why would they have a plan going forward if there wasn't something worth pursuing? So we can rest assured there's more science to investigate here.

JohnP
Posts: 296
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 3:29 am
Location: Chicago

Post by JohnP »

The tone of the article, and the quotes from Dr Nebel, are about as positive as you can get under the circumstances. Boy, it's hard to keep the champaign corked!

jormungandr
Posts: 13
Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2008 12:42 pm

Post by jormungandr »

JohnP wrote:The tone of the article, and the quotes from Dr Nebel, are about as positive as you can get under the circumstances. Boy, it's hard to keep the champaign corked!
I think I'll wait until the results get published. But I have a bottle of excellent mead that's been aging for a couple years that I might just have to open.

olivier
Posts: 155
Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2008 5:21 pm
Location: Cherbourg, France

Post by olivier »

IMO this article is a masterpiece in the art of blowing hot and cold :
Regardless of what happens to it, we're going to get this thing well written up and documented
... and we shall bury our manuscript in a chest for the generations to come. :(
I hope [Bob Bussard] will be remembered for that. I think that will be the case.
Hope is in the air ! :P

Champagne's waiting in the cellar.

MSimon
Posts: 14334
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:37 pm
Location: Rockford, Illinois
Contact:

Post by MSimon »

This is a WAG but I expect the results and a new contract to come out at the same time.
Engineering is the art of making what you want from what you can get at a profit.

Barry Kirk
Posts: 69
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2007 9:33 pm
Location: York, PA
Contact:

Post by Barry Kirk »

Again...

The reporting in and of itself is nuanced. He can't come out and say it until the official report is out.

But what he didn't say was more important than what he did say.

He never said "Don't get your hopes up"

So, I can feel free to get my hopes up.

seedload
Posts: 1062
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2008 8:16 pm

Post by seedload »

Wow, I read this entirely differently.

On results - "It's kind of a mix"
On going forward - "We don't know whether that's going to happen or not."
On the science - "Regardless of what happens to it, we're going to get this thing well written up..."
On Bussard's legacy - "(he) was a truly innovative person... I hope he will be remembered for that."

Sounds like they got some interesting results, but nothing clear. Sounds like the results aren't good enough to feel confident about funding. Sounds like there is a good probability that there will be no more funding but he wants to document the experiment well because it is interesting science if nothing else. Sounds like he hopes that this doesn't tarnish Bussard's reputation as an innovator.

I know he is watching what he says, but that is how it read to me - not hopeful at all.

The only encouraging line was when he said, "We're generally happy with what we've been getting out of it, and we've learned a tremendous amount". But, even that can be read as nothing more than this being an interesting experiment which provided good science but no clear path.

I hope I can't read.

JohnP
Posts: 296
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 3:29 am
Location: Chicago

Post by JohnP »

seedload wrote:Wow, I read this entirely differently.

On results - "It's kind of a mix"
On going forward - "We don't know whether that's going to happen or not."
On the science - "Regardless of what happens to it, we're going to get this thing well written up..."
On Bussard's legacy - "(he) was a truly innovative person... I hope he will be remembered for that."

I hope I can't read.
Well, these are the tidbits I found exciting:
When I talked with Nebel last week, he would say only that his team has "a plan to go forward."
If WB7 design didn't hold up, and if the concept wasn't working, why plan to go forward?
Nebel said his leave from Los Alamos is due to reach the one-year mark in mid-September, but he doesn't foresee any problem in extending the leave if the second-phase funding comes through.
Why would he bother thinking about extending his leave if the thing was a dud? Surely there must be interesting stuff going on at LANL.

Nebel strikes me as professional, and is under constraints not to reveal results prematurely, so sure, he speaks with care.

kurt9
Posts: 588
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2007 4:14 pm
Location: Portland, Oregon, USA

Post by kurt9 »

When will the review process be completed? If it is no-go for additional funding, will the experimental results be made publicly available so that others can pursue it?

LAYoung
Posts: 1
Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2008 11:28 pm

What to watch for...

Post by LAYoung »

Talk Polywell is great for following this topic, but what Journal or Conference would be a likely venue for publishing or making a public announcement about the results of WB-7?

Would they go to the International Aeronautical Conference, like Dr. Bussard did, or is there a better place to publish?

drmike
Posts: 825
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 11:54 pm
Contact:

Post by drmike »

Here are a few Plasma Conference listings. There are a lot of places to publish.

jlumartinez
Posts: 143
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2007 7:29 pm
Location: Spain

Post by jlumartinez »

"Bob Bussard was a truly innovative person, that's abundantly clear," Nebel said. "I hope he will be remembered for that. I think that will be the case."
For me this is quite clear. I hope I will be in the right track. We should wait for the review. This will give us the final clue ( or maybe not in case of going secret )

Post Reply