Talk-Polywell.org

a discussion forum for Polywell fusion
It is currently Fri Nov 28, 2014 8:10 am

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1797 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 ... 120  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 29, 2011 12:52 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2010 2:04 pm
Posts: 849
Location: Summerville SC, USA
Thanks for the contract post. Pardon the asides:

I've had trouble with insomnia for many years; except for the relevant portions, the U.S. Navy may have provided a cure.

Similarly, gentles, read...no don't, just scan the rest of the contract. It is a wonder anyone does business with the U.S. federal government - and this is a small contract!

_________________
“The mind of a bigot is like the pupil of the eye; the more light you pour on it, the more it will contract.”
―Oliver Wendell Holmes

R. Peters


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 29, 2011 5:16 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2009 11:15 am
Posts: 133
Location: Albania
Quote:
yes, see line items 3 and 4.


I see the line items, but the costs are blank.

_________________
Famous last words, "Hey, watch this!"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 29, 2011 9:33 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 11:18 pm
Posts: 4883
Location: North East Coast
Sorry,
See this:

https://www.neco.navy.mil/synopsis/deta ... ?id=238726

and the J&A:

https://www.neco.navy.mil/synopsis_file ... %20J&A.pdf

And I am still looking for the contract announcement where I believe they allocated the additional $4mil for line items 3 and 4.
We had it all laid out in a previous thread.

The break down was $8mil for WB8 and $4mil for WB8.1.

Edit: Corrected J&A link


Last edited by ladajo on Tue Mar 29, 2011 9:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 29, 2011 9:35 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 11:18 pm
Posts: 4883
Location: North East Coast
Duh,
It was right in front of me. Been a while since I looked at that stuff.

see: https://www.neco.navy.mil/synopsis/deta ... ?id=238726

for:

Quote:
The address for EMC2 is 1202 Parkway Dr, STE A, Santa Fe, NM 87507-7253. Award includes an option for a Wiffleball 8.1 for an additional $4,455,077.


in the final para.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 24, 2011 10:35 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 11:18 pm
Posts: 4883
Location: North East Coast
'bout that time again.
Any bets this time on the report?

I say, "testing behind, fuel introduced, fusions produced, anticipate full power testing by May 2011, projection for WB8 project completion by July, 2011, with final report by September 2011."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 25, 2011 1:42 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat May 01, 2010 6:43 am
Posts: 635
"Second plasma achieved in February."

_________________
Temperature, density, confinement time: pick any two.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 26, 2011 2:01 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 3:05 pm
Posts: 5904
Location: OlyPen WA
What do you bet this one gets lost like the Apr-Jun report last year?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 26, 2011 8:18 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 7:12 pm
Posts: 3105
I've been secretly hoping for "scaling favorability severely underestimated, facility vaporized during test in Feb, new team hired in Mar."

_________________
n*kBolt*Te = B**2/(2*mu0) and B^.25 loss scaling? Or not so much? Hopefully we'll know soon...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 26, 2011 8:34 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 3:05 pm
Posts: 5904
Location: OlyPen WA
I think we would have heard about that. :P


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 26, 2011 9:16 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 5:07 am
Posts: 1281
Location: N.C. Mountains
First plasma November 1, 2010, so nearly six months of operation with plasma. I wonder if R. Nebel has had WB-8 up to full power yet, or if he is being methodical and won't know what it looks like at maximum for a while?

_________________
Near term, cheap, dark horse fusion hits the air waves, GF - TED, LM - Announcement. The race is on.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 26, 2011 11:13 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat May 01, 2010 6:43 am
Posts: 635
"Now I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds."

_________________
Temperature, density, confinement time: pick any two.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 27, 2011 2:49 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 6:52 am
Posts: 2424
mvanwink5 wrote:
First plasma November 1, 2010, so nearly six months of operation with plasma. I wonder if R. Nebel has had WB-8 up to full power yet, or if he is being methodical and won't know what it looks like at maximum for a while?


I have speculated before about how much faster the data collection may be for this presumably magnet cooled machine. With WB6,7, the magnets would have to be cooled down while maintaining deep vacuums. The time between tests may have been a minimum of a few hours for the uncooled machines, and only a few minutes for WB8. . It also depends on the vacuum pumping. I suspect that even the vacuum vessel for WB8 is smaller than the large tank they had for WB6, so pumping time limits were probably also shorter- to clear the gas after each run.

I speculate that the first tests were plasma studies, magnet testing, gradual build up. Wiffleball tests, then lower B, lower Volt tests, and a few tests to near maximum B and Voltage tests. Then they probably backed of and did numerous tests as they gradually scaled up B and V levels. Finally, maximum B and V tests to try to squeeze out the most scaling information. With better controls, they might also significantly push the duration of tests- instead of a fraction of a millisecond, they might manage several hundred milliseconds. That would be very valuable in arguments about thermalization issues, more more truely steady state operation.

In, short they may have bee able to acquire critical information within a couple of months of first plasma. Provided the machine survives, they could then probably spend many months testing subtle effects as they twist the knobs.

Then again, they may be struggling with various problems, and be stalled.

Dan Tibbets

_________________
To error is human... and I'm very human.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 27, 2011 3:14 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2007 5:02 am
Posts: 1899
Location: Vancouver, Canada
TallDave wrote:
I've been secretly hoping for "scaling favorability severely underestimated, facility vaporized during test in Feb, new team hired in Mar."


There was one sim report a month or two ago that said scaling was only 3rd power of radius and breakeven would require a 150 meter machine. I would assume if scaling was 4th power we might then expect a machine of about 15 to 20 meters radius. That wouldn't fit in a submarine but might still be viable as a power source?

_________________
CHoff


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 27, 2011 4:24 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 8:50 pm
Posts: 1726
Power scaling of R^3*B^4 is well established physics. Assuming the magnetic field is limited by current density in the magnets, B proportionate to R is a plausible engineering estimate. This leads to R^7 power. Assuming R^2 losses, R^5 power gain.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 27, 2011 5:33 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 4:36 am
Posts: 1159
Location: Eastern Iowa
hanelyp wrote:
Power scaling of R^3*B^4 is well established physics. Assuming the magnetic field is limited by current density in the magnets, B proportionate to R is a plausible engineering estimate. This leads to R^7 power. Assuming R^2 losses, R^5 power gain.

The thing I don't get is the R^5 gain. This is what I see.
Code:
R   R^7   R^2   R^7 - R^2   R^5
2   128        4      124       32
3   2187      9    2178       243
4   16384   16   16368      1024

Obviously I'm missing something, but I'm sure R^7 - R^2 /= R^5.

_________________
Aero


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1797 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 ... 120  Next

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group