Fusion For Space Propulsion

If polywell fusion is developed, in what ways will the world change for better or worse? Discuss.

Moderators: tonybarry, MSimon

MSimon
Posts: 14331
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:37 pm
Location: Rockford, Illinois
Contact:

Fusion For Space Propulsion

Postby MSimon » Fri May 09, 2008 4:38 pm

Last edited by MSimon on Fri May 09, 2008 9:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Engineering is the art of making what you want from what you can get at a profit.

djolds1
Posts: 1296
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 8:03 am

Re: Fusion For Soace Propulsion

Postby djolds1 » Fri May 09, 2008 8:51 pm



As a LONG TERM fuel source I do prefer the DHe3 fuel cycle to pB11. Easier to access in a space based society, capable of providing millions of years of fuel for civilization in this solar system alone.

Much higher neutronicity than pB11, yes, but still minuscule next to DT and DD. 2x the energy output of pB11 in charged particle products for the primary DHe3 fuel cycle. And the technical requirements for the DHe3 cycle BFR are lower than those of the pB11 cycle BFR. Possibly useful when you switch over to production models.

And assuming we never crack gravity/field propulsion, Fusion pulse is ideal for travel beyond this system, and large stocks of DHe3 easier to obtain and justify expending for interstellar exploration and colonization than pB11. Higher energy content, easier acquisition assuming a mature space based economy.

However, I'd really prefer to crack field propulsion. :D
Vae Victis

Keegan
Posts: 206
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2007 6:29 am
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Postby Keegan » Wed May 21, 2008 11:37 am

Helium 3 is nice but you are still going to get some nasty high energy neutrons from unavoidable DD reactions that are going to occur. These present some serious problems. Especially in space flight.

The polywell is what it is today because of Dr B's quest to design a reactor to run p + B11. It is for all purposes built around this fuel, so we might as well use it.

I almost feel like posting something big on NASA spaceflight. What has me really excited is if we coat a p + B11 reactor wall with carbon (diamond film) It will not only effectively protect the reactor walls, but will generate oxygen. Something handy for spaceflight i believe 8)
Last edited by Keegan on Wed May 21, 2008 11:57 am, edited 1 time in total.
Purity is Power

vernes
Posts: 135
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 10:22 am
Location: The Netherlands

Postby vernes » Wed May 21, 2008 11:53 am

Keegan wrote:The polywell is what it is today because of Dr B's quest to design a reactor to run p + B11. It is for all purposes built around this fuel, so we might as well use it.
But for spaceflight, you get more eV from He and it requires less energy to generate fusion conditions.

I'm guessing they rather go for that and just put some more effort in shielding.
Perhaps putting the engine far away from crew and cargo?

reactor,shielding,cargo+crew
-O
>O##########=D
-O

Keegan
Posts: 206
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2007 6:29 am
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Postby Keegan » Wed May 21, 2008 12:09 pm

^ Vernes, when i talk about neutrons im not reffereing to the crew. Im talking about it wearing out the reactor. DD Tokamaks are uneconomical and have short lifespans cause of the neutron / first wall problem. You cant exactly repair a reactor in space. Alpha particles from p + B11 are different. Im currently integrating a solution.
Purity is Power

vernes
Posts: 135
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 10:22 am
Location: The Netherlands

Postby vernes » Wed May 21, 2008 2:21 pm

Keegan, you're right. Was was overlooking that fact.

djolds1
Posts: 1296
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 8:03 am

Postby djolds1 » Thu May 22, 2008 7:12 am

Keegan wrote:Helium 3 is nice but you are still going to get some nasty high energy neutrons from unavoidable DD reactions that are going to occur. These present some serious problems. Especially in space flight.


Neutronicity from DHe3 is not too difficult to deal with. And once in space in a significant way, the issue is what fuels are easiest to access and provide the highest return. Also, significant levels of radiation are present everywhere in space. Dealing with it is simply the cost of living.

Keegan wrote:The polywell is what it is today because of Dr B's quest to design a reactor to run p + B11. It is for all purposes built around this fuel, so we might as well use it.


No disagreement. An elegant concept that looks to be well on the way to realization. Certainly for the first several decades to century the pB11 cycle will be dominant. But once infrastructure in space is well along, the availability of fuels, power densities of output and lower necessary reactor efficiencies for the DHe3 cycle are attractive.

Keegan wrote:I almost feel like posting something big on NASA spaceflight. What has me really excited is if we coat a p + B11 reactor wall with carbon (diamond film) It will not only effectively protect the reactor walls, but will generate oxygen. Something handy for spaceflight i believe 8)


Interesting. Thanks.

Duane
Vae Victis

derg
Posts: 37
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 3:44 pm

Postby derg » Thu May 22, 2008 3:46 pm

I believe Dr. Bussard estimated it would take 5-7 years at $10 B to build after (and assuming) positive Polywell tests. Does that sound about right?

djolds1
Posts: 1296
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 8:03 am

Postby djolds1 » Fri May 23, 2008 5:16 am

derg wrote:I believe Dr. Bussard estimated it would take 5-7 years at $10 B to build after (and assuming) positive Polywell tests. Does that sound about right?


Using current North Atlantic lawfare-safe zilch-risk engineering practices, yes. Using Chinese/Russian/Indian/1950s US risk-tolerant engineering practices, 1.5 GUSD.

Duane
Vae Victis

derg
Posts: 37
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 3:44 pm

Postby derg » Fri May 23, 2008 11:30 am

djolds1 wrote:1.5 GUSD.



What does this mean?

tonybarry
Posts: 219
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2007 4:32 am
Location: Sydney, Australia
Contact:

Postby tonybarry » Fri May 23, 2008 12:31 pm

I think Duane means 1.5 x 10 ^ 9 US dollars. (a GigaDollar).

Regards,
Tony Barry

derg
Posts: 37
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 3:44 pm

Postby derg » Fri May 23, 2008 4:43 pm

Well if what djolds says is true and it turns out that time is a function of cost, then that should put it within the 18 month range of private sector investment. The private sector probably does more risk-tolerant engineering these days, so that might be the way to go.

djolds1
Posts: 1296
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 8:03 am

Postby djolds1 » Sat May 24, 2008 4:39 am

tonybarry wrote:I think Duane means 1.5 x 10 ^ 9 US dollars. (a GigaDollar).

Regards,
Tony Barry


Yup.

Giga-USD, also
Mega-USD (MUSD)
Kilo-USD (KUSD), and
Tera-USD (TUSD).

IIRC, the current US GDP is 15 TUSD.
Vae Victis


Return to “Implications”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest