Just more powerful magnets

Discuss how polywell fusion works; share theoretical questions and answers.

Moderators: tonybarry, MSimon

[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/vendor/twig/twig/lib/Twig/Extension/Core.php on line 1236: count(): Parameter must be an array or an object that implements Countable
ohiovr
Posts: 409
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 6:36 pm
Contact:

Just more powerful magnets

Postby ohiovr » Fri Feb 05, 2016 10:50 pm

Is the practicality of most fusion designs down to how powerful the available electromagnets are? Smaller gyroradii and longer containment times... If you could somehow make a 200 Tesla magnet (forget if it is possible) would practical fusion plants be popping up as fast as fission designs did in the 50s?

ohiovr
Posts: 409
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 6:36 pm
Contact:

Re: Just more powerful magnets

Postby ohiovr » Fri Feb 05, 2016 11:10 pm

Sorry if this has been asked before, I was unable to find the answer.

D Tibbets
Posts: 2775
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 6:52 am
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/vendor/twig/twig/lib/Twig/Extension/Core.php on line 1236: count(): Parameter must be an array or an object that implements Countable

Re: Just more powerful magnets

Postby D Tibbets » Sat Feb 06, 2016 12:23 am

May be, or not :?

Simple containment governed by gyro radius in a magnetic field should improve.Both cusp containment and ExB losses should be less. Simple scaling is that density can increase as the square of the B field with fusion as much as the B field to the 4th power. This may apply to stable magnetic containment fields- convex towards the higher densities of plasma, which generally mean cusp machines. In Tokamaks with closed fields, the pilonidal B fields weaken as you go out from the center. Stronger fields may help,but instabilities when they occur may be more devastating and efforts to control these instabilities may become more challenging, perhaps in an exponential fashion. Scrape off layers and diverter considerations may be more problematic. And with cusp machines like the Polywell injection of electrons through cusps may become more difficult. This seems to be a major concern with the Polywell currently. High Beta containment may be attractive, but this may also impede electron injection efficiency. Stronger B fields would possibly exacerbate this problem further.
For pinch machines like DPF, things may be more straight forward, or not...

I speculate that things may be represented best as a trend towards improvement till a peak is reached and then efficiency falls off. Where this peak for the various approaches lies may be tricky. Only very well understood modeling or expirement can give an answer. A comparison may be represented by the fusion cross section of D-D. It continues to increase at higher temperatures, but once the growth (slope of the curve) becomes less than the growth of Bremsstruhlung radiation, ground is lost. and eventually, at several MeV, atom smashing reactions begin to dominate.

PS: Gyrotron radiation- called cyclotron radiation in the accelerators of that name (I think) is a minor energy loss compared to Bremsstruhlung with B fields of a few Tesla. The magnatized plasma at several hundred or thousands of Tesla will eventually exceed Bremsstruhlung radiation. The machines where most of the plasma is not magnatized for most of the particles lifetimes may mostly avoid this problem. The Polywell and Lockheeds approach may be examples of this.

Dan Tibbets
To error is human... and I'm very human.

ladajo
Posts: 6204
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 11:18 pm
Location: North East Coast
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/vendor/twig/twig/lib/Twig/Extension/Core.php on line 1236: count(): Parameter must be an array or an object that implements Countable

Re: Just more powerful magnets

Postby ladajo » Sat Feb 06, 2016 1:32 am

There comes a point when the magnets would be too powerful and impact the ions excessively and change the behavioral dynamics. Traditionally this is not as much an issue due to mass.
The development of atomic power, though it could confer unimaginable blessings on mankind, is something that is dreaded by the owners of coal mines and oil wells. (Hazlitt)
What I want to do is to look up C. . . . I call him the Forgotten Man. (Sumner)

KitemanSA
Posts: 6114
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 3:05 pm
Location: OlyPen WA
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/vendor/twig/twig/lib/Twig/Extension/Core.php on line 1236: count(): Parameter must be an array or an object that implements Countable

Re: Just more powerful magnets

Postby KitemanSA » Sun Mar 06, 2016 5:56 pm


happyjack27
Posts: 1435
Joined: Wed Jul 14, 2010 5:27 pm
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/vendor/twig/twig/lib/Twig/Extension/Core.php on line 1236: count(): Parameter must be an array or an object that implements Countable

Re: Just more powerful magnets

Postby happyjack27 » Wed May 11, 2016 9:15 pm

the simulations i did seem to confirm the B^4 scaling law. Controlling the magnetic fields strength was by far the most effective way of controlling the fusion rate.

However, a few caveats, as Dan already pointed out:

* the biggest obstacle my simulations revealed is getting the electrons in through the cusps. like trying to get a bullseye through the eye of a tornado. and of course the higher the field strengh, the harder it is. and like the power scaling law, this scales non-linearly (though i don't know if it's b^2 or b^3 or what.)

* increasing the B field strength also impacts the average velocity (or KE, rather) through the core. and there's a KE (albeit very high), beyond which the fusion rate starts dropping off. While this'll probably be more than compensated for by the increased density, it remains true that after this point the scaling is going to be a little under B^4. Though not that bad, really. http://s155.photobucket.com/user/MSimon ... 1.jpg.html In fact, before that point you're really getting a boost over basic B^4 scaling because your cross-section is increasing pretty quickly. (unless that was already included in? i don't think so, but i don't know.)

* and finally, my simulation didn't model things like Bremsstruhlung loses, etc. only inertial and electromagnetic. fusion rate was approximated based on density and KE. So finer-scale / more subtle things like that, I can't speak to.

But yeah, these caveats aside, the two big factors are size and field strength, and field strength is the much bigger factor. though increasing size means you can increase the field strength more.

krenshala
Posts: 914
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2008 4:20 pm
Location: Austin, TX, NorAm, Sol III
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/vendor/twig/twig/lib/Twig/Extension/Core.php on line 1236: count(): Parameter must be an array or an object that implements Countable

Re: Just more powerful magnets

Postby krenshala » Thu May 12, 2016 8:43 pm

Does the increase in electron injection difficulty correspond to an equal increase in electron trapping? If so, it sounds (to a layman) like the injection drawback is cancelled out by an electron trapping benefit.

happyjack27
Posts: 1435
Joined: Wed Jul 14, 2010 5:27 pm
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/vendor/twig/twig/lib/Twig/Extension/Core.php on line 1236: count(): Parameter must be an array or an object that implements Countable

Re: Just more powerful magnets

Postby happyjack27 » Fri May 13, 2016 6:44 pm


happyjack27
Posts: 1435
Joined: Wed Jul 14, 2010 5:27 pm
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/vendor/twig/twig/lib/Twig/Extension/Core.php on line 1236: count(): Parameter must be an array or an object that implements Countable

Re: Just more powerful magnets

Postby happyjack27 » Wed May 18, 2016 4:54 pm


happyjack27
Posts: 1435
Joined: Wed Jul 14, 2010 5:27 pm
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/vendor/twig/twig/lib/Twig/Extension/Core.php on line 1236: count(): Parameter must be an array or an object that implements Countable

Re: Just more powerful magnets

Postby happyjack27 » Fri May 20, 2016 8:40 pm


ohiovr
Posts: 409
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 6:36 pm
Contact:

Re: Just more powerful magnets

Postby ohiovr » Fri May 20, 2016 8:53 pm

Ultra strong magnetic fields wouldn't mitigate bremsstrahlung losses unless you were doing something extremely clever. I have some hope with MIT and CO's findings regarding radiation loss concerning electrons. But I'm not holding my breath. :P


[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/vendor/twig/twig/lib/Twig/Extension/Core.php on line 1236: count(): Parameter must be an array or an object that implements Countable
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/vendor/twig/twig/lib/Twig/Extension/Core.php on line 1236: count(): Parameter must be an array or an object that implements Countable

Return to “Theory”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests