Heim Theory -

Discuss life, the universe, and everything with other members of this site. Get to know your fellow polywell enthusiasts.

Moderators: tonybarry, MSimon

Aero
Posts: 1200
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 4:36 am
Location: 92111

Post by Aero »

Paul, good to hear from you.
I had a comment to make on the Cellular Automation thread before PhsyOrg forum went down, but it'll wait. There are some new things to wonder about now.

First, how close does Mill's formulas come to the empirical values? Better or worse than Heim? Do they have any similar basis? If so, perhaps one points the way to complete the other.

Second, did you read the linked paper in the new thread posted today?
viewtopic.php?t=905
Using a lattice to compute masses as best I understand it. I'll bet their lattice was larger than metron size. Five years of computing on a very powerful machine, and they got within 2%. But that's good, there may be hope for a cellular automation approach.

Third, my comment. Did you start your calculations by stepping back in time to the point where matter first arose according to Heim Theory? Metrons were much larger at that time but I don't have any idea how large. Obviously large enough that matter appeared, and also small enough that matter stabilized within the metron grid. You could straight line it from the start to now, but I think, personally, that there was a discontinuity in the expansion rate when matter stabilized. The speed of light combined with Heim's size and age of the universe indicates to me that the expansion of the universe slowed significantly when matter appeared. Of course, it could be the other way around, what do I know? But I think that mass adds inertia which tends to slow change down as we know/see it. And as a hypothesis, I would speculate that unstable matter was around for quite some time before metron size became small enough that matter stabilized in some way. Its just a matter of striking a balance between ... what?

Anyway, see you on the PhsyOrg forum.
Aero

djolds1
Posts: 1296
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 8:03 am

Post by djolds1 »

Aero wrote:GREAT NEWS for this thread!

The PhsyOrg forum is back online!
YES!!!
Aero wrote:http://www.physforum.com/index.php?show ... 85&st=2235

We don't need to start over!

Now if only Nebel and Polywell development could come back from the pit of silence...
Grumble... grumble...

Duane
Vae Victis

rcain
Posts: 992
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2008 2:43 pm
Contact:

Post by rcain »

http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0806/0806.2271.pdf - fascinating, thanks for the link aero.

Hiem theory - http://www.engon.de/protosimplex/downlo ... 01.2en.pdf - looks an interesting, elegant approach. canonical production, geometric algebra, tensor folding, selector/commutator.

remarkable correlation, though boundary conditions are open to 'scrutiny' as are the 'holes' in the theory. interesting even the error function seems to conceal further systemic factors.

i recall some work of David Deutsch http://www.qubit.org/people/david/ analysis of on neural nets yielded similar clustering patterns, dynamics and propagation effects. perhaps not entirely surprising given the discreet state-space approach and algebra in use and the 'topology' of the system under study.

important to note this does not make Hiem theory an 'explanation' of the universe, though it might conceal a (more accurate/complete?) canonical production engine for 'representations' of the 'observable' (sensical/instrumented) universe, given certain starting conditions.

i dont know if i can be bothered to wait for LHC in order to find out 'nothing' or at best !H1.

anyone know if Hiem Theory(/Method) being adopted in any way by the experimental community, as a numerical estimator perhaps?

PS.
this is an interesting take on the subject - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noncommuta ... eld_theory
- non-Abalian (unlike Hiem as I understand it), though Heim could be extended i think.

a lot depends how we wish to 'ponder'/model irreversible entropy and confinement phenomenon (negentropy, eg structure and pattern, scale coupling, etc). the example of the smashed china cup.

Aero
Posts: 1200
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 4:36 am
Location: 92111

Post by Aero »

rcain wrote:http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0806/0806.2271.pdf - fascinating, thanks for the link aero.

Hiem theory - http://www.engon.de/protosimplex/downlo ... 01.2en.pdf - looks an interesting, elegant approach. canonical production, geometric algebra, tensor folding, selector/commutator.


anyone know if Hiem Theory(/Method) being adopted in any way by the experimental community, as a numerical estimator perhaps?
You're welcome :)

Yes, I find it interesting, not the least of which it the fact that it is simple enough that it can almost be understood.

I don't know, perhaps Duane (djolds1) knows. If not, then it is a question best posed on the PhsyOrg forum. hdeasy or willpi frequent that forum and would know if anyone does.
Aero

Post Reply