He3 catalysed DD cycle?

Discuss life, the universe, and everything with other members of this site. Get to know your fellow polywell enthusiasts.

Moderators: tonybarry, MSimon

Post Reply
Torulf2
Posts: 286
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 9:50 pm
Location: Swedem

He3 catalysed DD cycle?

Post by Torulf2 »

How dos the He3 catalysed DD cycle work?

As I understand it.
Reactor parameters are chosen so the Fusion Reaction Cross-Section is much bigger for D+He3 than for D+D, so al He3 is fast consumed. No unnecessary D+D reactions.

But if so, there produce same amount of T as He3.
From this you have D+T reactions and the nasty 14Mev neutron or T as waste product.

Hope I got something wrong.

drmike
Posts: 825
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 11:54 pm
Contact:

Post by drmike »

A little more than half way down this page is a list of fusion reactions with large cross section. It gets complicated fast if you really want to include all the probable reactions, and it will depend on the over all energy distribution. Most all computations assume thermal distributions, and the Polywell isn't thermal (although the center may be close enough). I think we can deal with a few neutrons, it's a major problem if the majority of reactions produce one.

Torulf2
Posts: 286
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 9:50 pm
Location: Swedem

Post by Torulf2 »

From what I read at that place and from this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fusion_power
I can not see you can reduce the tritium production. You get more energy out of the fuel but not small part ass 14Mew neutrons.

D Tibbets
Posts: 2775
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 6:52 am

Post by D Tibbets »

There are tricks that nuclear scientists/engeneers can use to increase the deuterium H3 reaction rate over deuterium side reactions. As shown in the referance by DrMike at 100,000 electron volts the D-H3 reaction cross section is 7-8 times that of D-D. And if if excess (10-20?, 10,000?) times more H3 is added than D then the chances of D-H3 collisions are increased over D-D. There would presumably be loss of efficiency due to increased nonproductive H3-H3 collisions, but so long as you have adequete 'Q' you can play with the ratios (and I'm sure other tricks) to meet some neutron tolarance goal. I beleive I have seen on the Wikipedia reference to aneutronic fusion that D-H3 is technically considered aneutronic as less than 1% of the energy is given off as neutrons- presumably with the above and other 'tricks'.

Dan Tibbets
To error is human... and I'm very human.

MSimon
Posts: 14335
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:37 pm
Location: Rockford, Illinois
Contact:

Post by MSimon »

Because the energy out per reaction is 1/10th that of a fission reaction, aneutronic only means that your neutron production is in the same range as a fission plant.

If you get a neutron production of 1E-4 per reaction or better you are getting somewhere. No shielding (distance, mass) requires something on the order of 1E-12 or better.

Sadly we do not know how to do that. Yet.
Engineering is the art of making what you want from what you can get at a profit.

Post Reply