seems our mid east policy is stabilizing the region.
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-yemen ... 4T20151227
"Saudi Air Defense Forces intercepted at about 11 P.M. (2000 GMT) yesterday a Scud missile launched from Sanaa, in Yemeni territory, toward the city of Najran ... the air force immediately destroyed the rocket launch platform," the Saudi statement said.
Mid east policy
-
paperburn1
- Posts: 2484
- Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2009 5:53 am
- Location: Third rock from the sun.
Mid east policy
I am not a nuclear physicist, but play one on the internet.
Re: Mid east policy
Mid-east policy from the current putz stabilizing the region? His push for the departure of Mubarak from Egypt and Kadaffy from Libya contributed to the mess that is ISIS. And it gets worse from there.
The daylight is uncomfortably bright for eyes so long in the dark.
-
paperburn1
- Posts: 2484
- Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2009 5:53 am
- Location: Third rock from the sun.
Re: Mid east policy
The State Department of the United States has claimed “Bringing Peace, and Security to Syria.” in 2015, and they’re standing by that statement.
Here’s an awesome quote from the US State Department on bringing peace and security to Syria.
Syria: The conflict in Syria has continued to unfold in tragic ways over the course of 2015. From the humanitarian crisis endured by refugees fleeing violence, to the reprehensible human rights violations and violence carried out by the Asad regime, the Syrian people have borne a heavy load. The United States and many members of the international community have stepped up to aid the Syrian people during their time of need – the United States has led the world in humanitarian aid contributions since the crisis began in 2011. Led by Secretary Kerry, the United States also continues to push for a political transition in Syria, and under his stewardship, in December, the UN Security Council passed a U.S.-sponsored resolution that puts forward a roadmap that will facilitate a transition within Syria to a credible, inclusive, nonsectarian government that is responsive to the needs of the Syrian people
The State Department said it, so it has to be true, and if they’re wrong, what difference does it make?
Here’s an awesome quote from the US State Department on bringing peace and security to Syria.
Syria: The conflict in Syria has continued to unfold in tragic ways over the course of 2015. From the humanitarian crisis endured by refugees fleeing violence, to the reprehensible human rights violations and violence carried out by the Asad regime, the Syrian people have borne a heavy load. The United States and many members of the international community have stepped up to aid the Syrian people during their time of need – the United States has led the world in humanitarian aid contributions since the crisis began in 2011. Led by Secretary Kerry, the United States also continues to push for a political transition in Syria, and under his stewardship, in December, the UN Security Council passed a U.S.-sponsored resolution that puts forward a roadmap that will facilitate a transition within Syria to a credible, inclusive, nonsectarian government that is responsive to the needs of the Syrian people
The State Department said it, so it has to be true, and if they’re wrong, what difference does it make?
I am not a nuclear physicist, but play one on the internet.