Sell The Whitehouse to Trump

[choff]

The MSM will proclaim Trumps extended Jewish family as definitive proof he's anti-semetic.

[hanelyp]

So the question of the day:
If trump has Nazis sympathies would not supporting them be detrimental to his financial well being as most of his extended family is hard core Jewish?

Conspiracy theories lobbed against Trump don't have to make rational sense. They're intended to trigger an emotional reaction among an unthinking mob.

Re: Wasp, I'd note that enemy operatives appear to already control some city and state governments. In the latest episode the police appear to have acted against an offensive but legal rally that local government had tried to deny, but ignored an overtly violent antifa counter mob throwing tear gas into the legal rally. On the other hand, a small team could devastate the big cities where the enemy seems to congregate by attacking infrastructure outside the cities, targets too dispersed to secure properly.

[choff]

Maybe Charlottesville and coverage of the latest Trump tirade are a planned distraction from a buildup to Korean War 2.0. So costly to prep for an attack, once the mobilization starts it has to go even if Lil' Kim backs down.

[Belgarath]

If you mean Bannon has been kicked off the NSC and McMaster has fired several of Bannon's Alt-Right buddies, well, good on him!

Replacing them with Muslims? If you subscribe to Bannon's old rag, they'll say the NSC is run by globalists, ISIS, and the deep state. Getting Bannon's fellow swamp monsters out of NSC is my idea of draining a swamp.

Interestingly, the leaks seem to have drastically decreased of late. You have to wonder if some of the leakers weren't Bannon's people. Would explain why Cerenivich freaked out about it. He hasn't spoken about his "white house contacts" since then. Odd coincidence.

[paperburn1]

Maybe Charlottesville and coverage of the latest Trump tirade are a planned distraction from a buildup to Korean War 2.0. So costly to prep for an attack, once the mobilization starts it has to go even if Lil' Kim backs down.

No

[choff]

https://www.infowars.com/pieczenik-cont ... lle-rally/

Richard Spencer, the supposed intellectual backbone of a gang of pro-Nazi losers, was born in the highly liberal town of Boston, Mass. Get this: He was born to the exceedingly wealthy, liberal ophthalmologist Dr. Rand Spencer MD and Sherry Dickenhorst, the heiress to cotton farms in Louisiana. No fool be he! Spencer went on to the University of Virginia studying English Literature and Music where he received High Distinctions. Does this sound like a manly type of Nazi He-Man?
Spencer has daddy issues and needed to prove that he was smarter than his highly professional father. So Spencer then went on to the University of Chicago where this ‘she-man’ received a M.A. in Humanities.[All Wikipedia]. Not content to be completely self-feminized, he traveled to Vienna International Summer University. Did he want to waltz or stroll through the Vienna Woods on a leisurely day?
We have no evidence that he did anything that would make him a representative of the white-working class: working in construction, building a company, or serving in our military. God forbid! It was too much bother! Still feeling inadequate, Spencer we went on to get another degree at the University of Chicago to study Modern European Intellectual History. He furthered his worthless life by ‘pursuing a life of thought [crime]’. Whatever that means?

Next, Spencer fled to Whitefish, Montana because he could not find a real job like the working class deplorables that he supposedly represents. BTW, WhiteFish is a tony, antique shop laden very expensive place to fish but nothing is off the table when it comes to luxury for our man Spencer. At the same time, he would commute to another house in Arlington, Va. [also expensive].
Spencer then married and divorced a Russian-American wife, Nina Kouprianova, a political analyst of contemporary Russian and U. S. Foreign Policy. What do you want to make a bet that she and he are connected to the [CIA]?
On the other side of the political spectrum, we have an equally laissez –faire, useless intellectual named Michael Signer. Interesting that Signer worked for John Podesta the Molesta and was in Obama’s State Department Transition Team. Hmmm.

This prissy she-man just like Spencer lived in Arlington Va. and graduated Magnum Cum Laude from Princeton University in political science. Just like Spencer, he went on to the University of California, Berkley and received his law degree from guess where? Yes, the University of Virginia Law School. So both opponents went to the same school and lived in the same places?
Coincidences?

[Betruger]

confirmation bias overdrive

[choff]

Rent a Crowd.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-08-1 ... e-last-wee

[Betruger]

Hopeless. It never gets old seeing people lose it over some powerful scumbag du jour who wouldn't think twice of disposing of them if it served his/her purposes. The cockroach thankful for being stepped on.

The sooner we cure aging (time), get off this rock (space & matter), and solve fusion (or some other energy scheme), the sooner we can say goodbye to "society"s madness. Maybe that's the origin of Fermi's paradox. The further the better.

[Diogenes]

Not Bill the galactic hero but

Wasp is a 1957 science fiction novel by English author Eric Frank Russell. Terry Pratchett (author of the Discworld series of fantasy books) stated that he "can't imagine a funnier terrorists' handbook." Wasp is generally considered Russell's best novel.[1]

The title of Wasp comes from the idea that the main character's actions and central purpose mimic that particular insect; just as something as small as a wasp can terrorise a much larger creature in control of a car to the point of causing a crash and killing the occupants, so the defeat of an enemy may be wrought via psychological and guerrilla warfare by a small, but deadly, protagonist in their midst.
This short story seems to be a playbook for what is happening now, all we have to do id fill in the characters with actor states.

That sounds like an awesome book. It sounds similar to Gordon R. Dickson's "Tactics of Mistake", though his book was not meant to be comical. I've read quite a lot of stories by Terry Pratchett, but i'm not sure i've read anything by Eric Frank Russel. It doesn't sound familiar, but i've quite lost track of how many books and their various authors I have read in my life.

[Diogenes]

So the question of the day:
If trump has Nazis sympathies would not supporting them be detrimental to his financial well being as most of his extended family is hard core Jewish?

Argh! I repeatedly pointed out this cognitive dissonance to a bunch of "Never Trumpers" who thought the Former New York Liberal Democrat with all Jewish grandchildren would somehow be a racist.

His son married a Jewish girl. His Daughters married Jewish guys. He's from FREAKIN' NEW YORK! Hello? Just how racist can he be?

They couldn't grasp the concept.

[Diogenes]

Maybe Charlottesville and coverage of the latest Trump tirade are a planned distraction from a buildup to Korean War 2.0. So costly to prep for an attack, once the mobilization starts it has to go even if Lil' Kim backs down.

Too conspiratorial. It's far more likely that the Leftist Media is throwing another temper tantrum at the fact that Trump won, and are trying to delegitimize him with the power of their media monopoly.


It worked on Nixon, didn't it?

[Diogenes]

Hopeless. It never gets old seeing people lose it over some powerful scumbag du jour who wouldn't think twice of disposing of them if it served his/her purposes. The cockroach thankful for being stepped on.

The sooner we cure aging (time), get off this rock (space & matter), and solve fusion (or some other energy scheme), the sooner we can say goodbye to "society"s madness. Maybe that's the origin of Fermi's paradox. The further the better.

It is my belief, that wherever goes man, the madness comes with him.

I think the madness we are seeing now is a consequence of our unparalleled prosperity. Only in austerity do people seemingly behave more rationally.

[williatw]

The media couldn't be more blatant in distorting Trump's words on Charlottesville

By John Lott, Jr., opinion contributor

But Trump never said that the white supremacists and neo-Nazis were “very fine people.” He said that there two different types of people protesting the taking down of the Robert E. Lee statue – the racists (“some very bad people in that group”), and people who thought that for the sake of history it was important not to take down the statue.

Has the media ever so deliberately and consistently misinterpreted what a president said?

It certainly seems as if the media finally found its proof that President Trump is a racist. ABC News’ coverage was all too typical:


Trump quickly blamed both sides for the conflict, adding that there were "very fine people" among both the protesters — which included white supremacists and white nationalists — and the counterprotesters.

"I think there is blame on both sides. You look at both sides. I think there is blame on both sides," Trump said today. "You had some very bad people in that group. You also had some very fine people on both sides," he added.

With wall-to-wall news coverage repeating this misreading of Trump’s statement, it’s not too surprising that politicians from both parties quickly condemned the “very fine people” comment. NBC’s headline read: “Democratic, Republican Lawmakers Decry Trump’s Latest Charlottesville Remarks.” Ohio Gov. John Kasich attacked Trump: “This is terrible. The President of the United States needs to condemn these kinds of hate groups. The president has to totally condemn this."

Does anyone even listen to comments anymore before commenting on them?

When it comes to the president, do politicians just take reporters at their word?

But Trump never said that the white supremacists and neo-Nazis were “very fine people.” He said that there two different types of people protesting the taking down of the Robert E. Lee statue – the racists (“some very bad people in that group”), and people who thought that for the sake of history it was important not to take down the statue.

Here is Trump’s own explanation from his press conference.

Trump: “And you had people, and I'm not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists, because they should be condemned totally. But you had many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and white nationalists.

“OK? And the press has treated them absolutely unfairly.”

Reporter: “You were saying the press has treated white nationalists unfairly? (inaudible) understand what you're saying.”

Trump: “No, no. There were people in that rally, and I looked the night before. If you look, they were people protesting very quietly the taking down of the statue of Robert E. Lee. I'm sure in that group there were some bad ones. The following day, it looked like they had some rough, bad people – neo-Nazis, white nationalists, whatever you want to call them.

“But you had a lot of people in that group that were there to innocently protest and very legally protest, because you know – I don't know if you know, they had a permit. The other group didn't have a permit.”

President Trump made it very clear that his comment did not pertain to “neo-Nazis and the white nationalists.” When a reporter misinterpreted his very clear statement, Trump again made it clear that the bad people were the “neo-Nazis, white nationalists.”

How much clearer could the president be?

The press continually misreports Trump’s statements. Take the recent smearing of Trump over the claim that he ignored the outstretched hand of a disabled, young boy. In fact, the video was selectively edited. Trump had actually had just spent time talking with the boy.

Or the claim in such news outlets as Politico that, “The president signs [a kid’s hat] and then tosses the hat into the crowd.” The statement was simply false. From another angle it was clear that the president was tossing the hat back to the boy, and some in the media ran corrections. But the problem is that the media was so readily willing to believe the worst about the president.

Many apparently still believe that Trump made fun of a disabled NY Times reporter during last year's campaign when in fact, Trump only used a type of gesture that he often used to make fun of people flaying away when faced with tough questioning. Trump used the gesture to make fun of himself as well as others, including Sen. Ted Cruz.

The mainstream media keeps trying to claim that neo-Nazis, who are socialists, are somehow “right-wingers” and naturally support Trump and Republicans. But the very tiny number of neo-Nazis in our country have political views on economic issues that are much closer to Sen. Bernie Sanders


(I-Vt.) than to Trump’s. Their views on race are just as far away from Trump as they are from Sanders.

Does the press just think that no one will look at what Trump actually said? For those who do look at the original interview and Trump’s multiple, clear statements on the matter, the media risks losing what little credibility it still has.

http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/m ... s-words-on


It is clear to me at least that a significant percentage of the "main stream media" is trying to engineer a "coup" of sorts; that is try to force Trump to "abdicate" in favor of someone else, maybe Mike Pence (though in their heart of hearts they probably subconsciously wish it could be Queen Hillary somehow).



Gore's advice for Trump: 'Resign'

Al Gore says it’s time for President Donald Trump to leave office.

“Resign,” the former Democratic vice president told the website LADbible in an interview published Thursday. He was asked what single piece of advice he’d give Trump.

http://www.politico.com/story/2017/08/1 ... ign-241760


Because of what? allegedly injudicious remarks after the recent Charlottesville riots? How come no one suggested (or even seemingly remembers much) the riots that occurred under Obama? As if they never happened; don't recall the media ascribing much blame to Obama when they happened. Don't recall his being that effective in resolving the underlying issue or "bring us together" or whatever. Though he was "clever" in avoiding much blame or criticism being directed at him; so a "victory" of sorts. Luckily...hearing something like this from Gore would probably stiffen Trump's resolve not to give in; no way Trump would let that loser Gore have the last laugh on him.

[paperburn1]

There is a great video on YouTube by a gentleman called CPGREY.
It is called rules for rulers and hits on key point of how to get power and how to maintain power.
Although the title refers to dictators it actually does apply to anyone in office. I recommend it for anyone new to todays politics and its reality's
It seems he has violated several and may be doomed.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rStL7niR7gs