MIT Climate Scientist Dr. Richard Lindzen
His last job was testifying for the tobacco companies that tobacco doesn't cause cancer. Gee, so he's a climate scientist, hmm? What's he doing testifying about tobacco then?
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?ti ... S._Lindzen
Turns out he has an Associate Degree in physics. He's a mathematician and a meteorologist. Meteorology is not oceanic and atmospheric geophysics. He doesn't know shit about atmospheric and oceanic geophysics. He only knows about weather. Climate, as you have been told a billion times, is not weather.
And THIS boys and girls, is another fallacy so old it has a Latin name. It's called "Argumentum ad Hominem. "
The notion that he has a PHD in Mathematics from Harvard of course has absolutely no bearing on his ability to critique a mathematics based computer model of a chaotic system.
Idiot Climate blog wrote:
According to Dr. Lindzen, the findings of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change are problematic and limited because they are based on computer models which Lindzen says are "generally recognized as experimental tools whose relation to the real world is questionable."
Tell me, do you have any arguments which are NOT fallacies? Or have you always remained a child in the area of logic and reason?
Last but not least, he's against "computer models." Guess what meteorology is all completely 100% chock full of? Computer models. Know why 5 day forecasts became 10 day forecasts? (Subtext: are you old enough to remember 5 day forecasts?)
Once again, i'm completely surprised (not really) that such a super scientific genius/advocate/prick is not aware of the limitations of chaotic models. Sure, 5 days, ten days, whatever. Years? Decades? If you believe that, then you sir, are a simpleton, as well as being full of sh*t.
Don't even bother lying. You're wasting everyone's time. I've already done all this a million times over. I've seen every lie you can tell and I have the sources that prove them lies.
If anyone took you seriously we might be offended. Instead we regard you more as a ranting little cartoon character who provides us with amusement.
(Artist's rendition of Schneibster depicted below
‘What all the wise men promised has not happened, and what all the damned fools said would happen has come to pass.’
— Lord Melbourne —