Page 1 of 2

Quantum Transitions

Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 10:02 pm
by jlumartinez

Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 10:57 pm
by kunkmiester
Wow, I almost understand all that. Very interesting.

So, he's got one of my three keys: He's explained things that current physics explains, but simpler in some cases.

He's got part of the second: Phenomena that are observed, but not adequately explained by current science, seem to work out better this way.

The third was hinted at, but not covered: Reformation requires that the new theories predict an entirely new phenomena, that can then be tested for.

This will be interesting.

Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 11:38 pm
by MSimon
I have sent this off to the usual suspects

Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 11:50 pm
by ladajo
Hmmm.

And for the record, it is "Spay War" or "Spa War", not spawer.
Space and Naval Warfare Systems Command

urghhh.

I cant wait for my new flying toaster with built in infinite power source. :D

Posted: Wed Jan 27, 2010 12:23 am
by MSimon
I put the video up here along with links to some of the texts in the video:

http://powerandcontrol.blogspot.com/201 ... amics.html

Also at IEC Fusion Technology and Classical Values.

Posted: Wed Jan 27, 2010 12:26 am
by MSimon
ladajo wrote:Hmmm.

And for the record, it is "Spay War" or "Spa War", not spawer.
Space and Naval Warfare Systems Command

urghhh.

I cant wait for my new flying toaster with built in infinite power source. :D
Yeah. When I was doing work for the Navy we always called it Spa War or preferentially Spa Wars.

i.e. a fight with some beauties in a hot tub.

Posted: Wed Jan 27, 2010 1:13 am
by jlumartinez

Posted: Wed Jan 27, 2010 1:30 am
by wisnij
It ranks pretty high on the ol' crackpot index, so...

Posted: Wed Jan 27, 2010 1:39 am
by MSimon
wisnij wrote:It ranks pretty high on the ol' crackpot index, so...
Except for George Miley. And Cold Fusion.

The one reaction I got from my Fusion list (not public) so far was positive.

And it does not contradict physics. It just gives a different way to calculate the numbers which is consistent with known facts (the radius of the hydrogen atom).

Posted: Wed Jan 27, 2010 10:05 am
by rashudo
What kind of new phenomena can we expect if this is true?

Posted: Wed Jan 27, 2010 10:07 am
by MSimon
rashudo wrote:What kind of new phenomena can we expect if this is true?
It may help explain cold fusion. If so it may help us figure out how to up the power output to useful numbers.

Posted: Wed Jan 27, 2010 3:55 pm
by BenTC
wrt the mentioned "speed of sound = speed of light"
I wonder how this might relate: Caltech Scientists First to Trap Light and Sound Vibrations Together in Nanocrystal

Posted: Wed Jan 27, 2010 7:31 pm
by EricF
rashudo wrote:What kind of new phenomena can we expect if this is true?
Something beyond the solid-state hard drive? The Bose Condensate Hard drive? :lol:

Posted: Wed Jan 27, 2010 9:09 pm
by vernes
Sounds interesting.
If true, this seems like a nice BIG step forward in our understandings about how things work.

If true.

Posted: Wed Jan 27, 2010 10:45 pm
by Scupperer
I think I'm understanding some of this - finding a similar constant in these two disparate experiments allowed this guy to backtrack the source of the constant to the energy of electrons jumping from one orbit to another.

By assuming the effects of these experiments was due to a resonance, he was able to use classical equations to describe it, and the results not only replicate results of quantum equations (using classical equations), but provides a new mathematical bridge between the two that may allow for prediction of entirely new results, and explanation for known anomalies that neither describe.

Pretty exciting, if it pans out, but how does gravity work its way in there? Is it simply an assumption that gravity (or effect of gravity on the resonating material) has the same frequency constant as this transitional state, because of the other experiment's results? The video doesn't really describe this well, mathematically or otherwise.