Josh Cryer On Polywell At DU

Discuss life, the universe, and everything with other members of this site. Get to know your fellow polywell enthusiasts.

Moderators: tonybarry, MSimon

MSimon
Posts: 14335
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:37 pm
Location: Rockford, Illinois
Contact:

Josh Cryer On Polywell At DU

Post by MSimon »

*

http://www.democraticunderground.com/di ... 115x227021

*

Comment #4 to start.

And he is a 1000+ posts guy.

It is all beginning to make sense.
Engineering is the art of making what you want from what you can get at a profit.

Jccarlton
Posts: 1747
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2007 6:14 pm
Location: Southern Ct

Re: Josh Cryer On Polywell At DU

Post by Jccarlton »

MSimon wrote:*

http://www.democraticunderground.com/di ... 115x227021

*

Comment #4 to start.

And he is a 1000+ posts guy.

It is all beginning to make sense.
The lack any kind of technical knowledge on that board was incredible. Do they really think that they can "feel" their way to a solution with some hand waving.

MSimon
Posts: 14335
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:37 pm
Location: Rockford, Illinois
Contact:

Re: Josh Cryer On Polywell At DU

Post by MSimon »

Jccarlton wrote:
MSimon wrote:*

http://www.democraticunderground.com/di ... 115x227021

*

Comment #4 to start.

And he is a 1000+ posts guy.

It is all beginning to make sense.
The lack any kind of technical knowledge on that board was incredible. Do they really think that they can "feel" their way to a solution with some hand waving.
Yes.

What amazed me is that they actually believe that the US can actually get to 20% AE in the near future (14 years) and that it will work fine.

I published on my blog a while back on a country that had about 10% AE penetration (actual energy production) but fuel use only declined by 2.5%.

It is all unicorns and rainbows (free energy) and if we don't get the unicorns and rainbows ASAP it will be catastrophe.
Engineering is the art of making what you want from what you can get at a profit.

Jccarlton
Posts: 1747
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2007 6:14 pm
Location: Southern Ct

Re: Josh Cryer On Polywell At DU

Post by Jccarlton »

MSimon wrote:
Jccarlton wrote:
MSimon wrote:*

http://www.democraticunderground.com/di ... 115x227021

*

Comment #4 to start.

And he is a 1000+ posts guy.

It is all beginning to make sense.
The lack any kind of technical knowledge on that board was incredible. Do they really think that they can "feel" their way to a solution with some hand waving.
Yes.

What amazed me is that they actually believe that the US can actually get to 20% AE in the near future (14 years) and that it will work fine.

I published on my blog a while back on a country that had about 10% AE penetration (actual energy production) but fuel use only declined by 2.5%.

It is all unicorns and rainbows (free energy) and if we don't get the unicorns and rainbows ASAP it will be catastrophe.
And I am the delusional ignoramus.

Roger
Posts: 788
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2007 2:03 am
Location: Metro NY

Re: Josh Cryer On Polywell At DU

Post by Roger »

MSimon wrote:
And he is a 1000+ posts guy.
Josh is at 12k I am at 11k.
I like the p-B11 resonance peak at 50 KV acceleration. In2 years we'll know.

MSimon
Posts: 14335
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:37 pm
Location: Rockford, Illinois
Contact:

Re: Josh Cryer On Polywell At DU

Post by MSimon »

Roger wrote:
MSimon wrote:
And he is a 1000+ posts guy.
Josh is at 12k I am at 11k.
Haven't seen you around much. What's up?
Engineering is the art of making what you want from what you can get at a profit.

MSimon
Posts: 14335
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:37 pm
Location: Rockford, Illinois
Contact:

Post by MSimon »

http://www.populartechnology.net/2009/1 ... lobal.html

Nice video at the link. But I particularly liked:

Green is the new Red!

Cute chick about 1:15 into this video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FN401-BF ... r_embedded
Engineering is the art of making what you want from what you can get at a profit.

IntLibber
Posts: 747
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 3:28 pm

Post by IntLibber »

MSimon wrote: http://www.populartechnology.net/2009/1 ... lobal.html

Nice video at the link. But I particularly liked:

Green is the new Red!

Cute chick about 1:15 into this video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FN401-BF ... r_embedded
You.know.its.videos.like.that.that.make.me.take.FOX.News.seriously...
I.mean.like.geesh.if.you.are.gonna.have.a.socialist.revolution.at.least.
hide.it.and.call.it.something.electable...like.the.Democratic.National.
Committee...Evidently.those.guys.rode.the.communist.short.bus.to.the.
rally...

DeltaV
Posts: 2245
Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 5:05 am

Re: Josh Cryer On Polywell At DU

Post by DeltaV »

MSimon wrote:*

http://www.democraticunderground.com/di ... 115x227021

*

Comment #4 to start.

And he is a 1000+ posts guy.

It is all beginning to make sense.
The "Anarchy" symbol is troubling.

MSimon
Posts: 14335
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:37 pm
Location: Rockford, Illinois
Contact:

Re: Josh Cryer On Polywell At DU

Post by MSimon »

DeltaV wrote:
MSimon wrote:*

http://www.democraticunderground.com/di ... 115x227021

*

Comment #4 to start.

And he is a 1000+ posts guy.

It is all beginning to make sense.
The "Anarchy" symbol is troubling.
Shoot to kill orders deters looters.
Engineering is the art of making what you want from what you can get at a profit.

djolds1
Posts: 1296
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 8:03 am

Re: Josh Cryer On Polywell At DU

Post by djolds1 »

MSimon wrote:
Jccarlton wrote:The lack any kind of technical knowledge on that board was incredible. Do they really think that they can "feel" their way to a solution with some hand waving.
Yes.

What amazed me is that they actually believe that the US can actually get to 20% AE in the near future (14 years) and that it will work fine.

I published on my blog a while back on a country that had about 10% AE penetration (actual energy production) but fuel use only declined by 2.5%.

It is all unicorns and rainbows (free energy) and if we don't get the unicorns and rainbows ASAP it will be catastrophe.
Irrelevant. Enthusiastic support for Polywell and/or other promising fusion methods is useful no matter the source or skill therefound.

Polywell & related are a unique case where enthusiastic supporters cross partisan lines, and the support can be justified from multiple approaches. That odd couple linkage should be fostered, not denigrated, in the area of shared interest.
Vae Victis

Diogenes
Posts: 6967
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 3:33 pm

Re: Josh Cryer On Polywell At DU

Post by Diogenes »

djolds1 wrote:
MSimon wrote:
Jccarlton wrote:The lack any kind of technical knowledge on that board was incredible. Do they really think that they can "feel" their way to a solution with some hand waving.
Yes.

What amazed me is that they actually believe that the US can actually get to 20% AE in the near future (14 years) and that it will work fine.

I published on my blog a while back on a country that had about 10% AE penetration (actual energy production) but fuel use only declined by 2.5%.

It is all unicorns and rainbows (free energy) and if we don't get the unicorns and rainbows ASAP it will be catastrophe.
Irrelevant. Enthusiastic support for Polywell and/or other promising fusion methods is useful no matter the source or skill therefound.

Polywell & related are a unique case where enthusiastic supporters cross partisan lines, and the support can be justified from multiple approaches. That odd couple linkage should be fostered, not denigrated, in the area of shared interest.

I made the same point to the various Gun advocate groups I spoke to years ago. Most of the Gun activists are Republicans, but a lot are Democrats. I made certain everyone understood that the best place for Gun Advocates to be is getting support (and fear) from both sides. We worked with Democrats legislatively a lot, and achieved successes and credibility by making them understand we wouldn't bother them (campaign against them) as long as they agreed with us about the right to keep and bear arms.

MSimon
Posts: 14335
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:37 pm
Location: Rockford, Illinois
Contact:

Re: Josh Cryer On Polywell At DU

Post by MSimon »

djolds1 wrote:
MSimon wrote:
Jccarlton wrote:The lack any kind of technical knowledge on that board was incredible. Do they really think that they can "feel" their way to a solution with some hand waving.
Yes.

What amazed me is that they actually believe that the US can actually get to 20% AE in the near future (14 years) and that it will work fine.

I published on my blog a while back on a country that had about 10% AE penetration (actual energy production) but fuel use only declined by 2.5%.

It is all unicorns and rainbows (free energy) and if we don't get the unicorns and rainbows ASAP it will be catastrophe.
Irrelevant. Enthusiastic support for Polywell and/or other promising fusion methods is useful no matter the source or skill therefound.

Polywell & related are a unique case where enthusiastic supporters cross partisan lines, and the support can be justified from multiple approaches. That odd couple linkage should be fostered, not denigrated, in the area of shared interest.
I agree about Polywell. And you will note in my discussions of bad science/engineering with Josh I support him where I think he has got it right.

I do not have enemies. I have differences of opinion (for the most part).
Engineering is the art of making what you want from what you can get at a profit.

Diogenes
Posts: 6967
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 3:33 pm

Post by Diogenes »

I followed a link to an article by a Liberal college professor (who ever heard of one of those?) slamming Obama.

http://www.commondreams.org/view/2010/01/22-7

The guy makes some good points, but he also makes some crazy insane points that won't make any sense to someone with a clue. The comments which followed are very similar in this regard. Some of them are sensible, and others are barking at the moon insane.

What I find particularly odd is how people can easily mix in nut ball crazy talk with some very reasonable things. To borrow a line from Mr. Spock.

Fascinating.

Image

Josh Cryer
Posts: 526
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2008 7:19 am

Post by Josh Cryer »

If you've been wondering where I've been, my mom is in the hospital, fairly bad, so I've been spending my whole time there. I still make time to post on DU and NewMars, but not here.

You can tell I have no love for ITER, I try not to be a hater though, because if Polywell doesn't work it is the future for our civilization, but yeah, doesn't look good for our generation (or three).

E&E on DU is not nuke (fission) friendly. I understand where they come from because of the historic costs of nuclear (I myself don't see it being competitive with fossil fuels unless CO2 emissions were banned and it had to compete only with renewables). The fact that renewables now produce more energy in the US than nuclear is a boon for the anti-nukers (fission).

There is some support for the thorium path for nuclear but there seems to be no significant research to those ends outside of India (who has major thorium reserves).

As far as technically minded goes, DU is a political forum with mostly 50 something females in my experience (due to polls in the past attempting to discover demographics, highly unscientific of course). Even if it had more diverse demographics its nature is still political, so you can't really fault them for that.

The Science, E&E, and Skeptics subforums have the technically minded people.
Science is what we have learned about how not to fool ourselves about the way the world is.

Post Reply