Page 1 of 1

MIT Plasma Thruster Program

Posted: Thu Mar 12, 2009 3:11 am
by MSimon

Re: MIT Plasma Thruster Program

Posted: Thu Mar 12, 2009 4:13 am
by djolds1
Ah yes, the helicon thruster. Shows up as a component of the VASIMR and Dr. Winglee's contraptions (M2P2, Magbeam, etc).

Nice ideas all, and IMO all irrelevant. Its those first 150kms that are killer. Beat those and you're halfway to anywhere.

Posted: Thu Mar 12, 2009 4:25 am
by Betruger
I'm no specialist, but everything I've seen shows the VASIMR schemes as clearly the best for propulsion within the Mars/Jupiter asteroid belt, and easily the best for station keeping around any planet or satellite within the inner system.

Posted: Thu Mar 12, 2009 5:28 am
by djolds1
Betruger wrote:I'm no specialist, but everything I've seen shows the VASIMR schemes as clearly the best for propulsion within the Mars/Jupiter asteroid belt, and easily the best for station keeping around any planet or satellite within the inner system.
Depends on your definition of "best."

Typical NASA/DoD "low mass, fast, and costs more than the GDP of China?"

Until you're in LEO its all vaporware. And even once in LEO, much cheaper and a bit slower has attractions.

Re: MIT Plasma Thruster Program

Posted: Thu Mar 12, 2009 2:04 pm
by KitemanSA
djolds1 wrote: Nice ideas all, and IMO all irrelevant. Its those first 150kms that are killer. Beat those and you're halfway to anywhere.
KITE launchers of the world unite! :o

Re: MIT Plasma Thruster Program

Posted: Thu Mar 12, 2009 4:47 pm
by djolds1
KitemanSA wrote:
djolds1 wrote: Nice ideas all, and IMO all irrelevant. Its those first 150kms that are killer. Beat those and you're halfway to anywhere.
KITE launchers of the world unite! :o
:twisted: There are a number of options. Various air launch/cannon or ram accelerator/tether relays, The "Cheap & Stupid Engineering" philosophy of the Sea Dragon BDB, and of course a megascale structure for a national prestige project. Plenty of pathways if the will is there.

Re: MIT Plasma Thruster Program

Posted: Thu Mar 12, 2009 7:05 pm
by alexjrgreen
KitemanSA wrote:
djolds1 wrote: Nice ideas all, and IMO all irrelevant. Its those first 150kms that are killer. Beat those and you're halfway to anywhere.
KITE launchers of the world unite! :o
SkyBase, anyone?

Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 3:40 am
by IntLibber
Betruger wrote:I'm no specialist, but everything I've seen shows the VASIMR schemes as clearly the best for propulsion within the Mars/Jupiter asteroid belt, and easily the best for station keeping around any planet or satellite within the inner system.
VASIMR's big claim to fame is its ability to thrust/impulse throttle, which no other electric propulsion system can do. However, it is a bit of a power hog.

Re: MIT Plasma Thruster Program

Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 5:26 pm
by Roger
KitemanSA wrote:
djolds1 wrote: Nice ideas all, and IMO all irrelevant. Its those first 150kms that are killer. Beat those and you're halfway to anywhere.
KITE launchers of the world unite! :o
Obviously the poster is paid by the Kite Manufacturers Association of the United States. Probably a Kite lobbyist............

Re: MIT Plasma Thruster Program

Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 8:37 pm
by KitemanSA
Roger wrote:
KitemanSA wrote:
djolds1 wrote: Nice ideas all, and IMO all irrelevant. Its those first 150kms that are killer. Beat those and you're halfway to anywhere.
KITE launchers of the world unite! :o
Obviously the poster is paid by the Kite Manufacturers Association of the United States. Probably a Kite lobbyist............
See endo-atmospheric tethers in the non-rocket spacelaunch page of wikipedia.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-rocket_spacelaunch

Re: MIT Plasma Thruster Program

Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 11:21 pm
by JohnSmith
KitemanSA wrote: There are a number of options. Various air launch/cannon or ram accelerator/tether relays, The "Cheap & Stupid Engineering" philosophy of the Sea Dragon BDB, and of course a megascale structure for a national prestige project. Plenty of pathways if the will is there.
Ah, my very favorite launch technique, the ram accelerator. A fun variant is the laser launch tube. Maybe if the military ever gets those megawatt lasers right...

Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 11:58 pm
by Aero
I saw on TV that the Pumpkin launcher (tosser) record is over 4000 feet. If we could just ramp that technology up by a factor just over 5280 times, that would make a fun launch device. Its real simple tech, too! It just uses a very long tube and a lot of compressed air.

Re: MIT Plasma Thruster Program

Posted: Tue Mar 17, 2009 1:18 am
by KitemanSA
JohnSmith wrote:
KitemanSA wrote: There are a number of options. Various air launch/cannon or ram accelerator/tether relays, The "Cheap & Stupid Engineering" philosophy of the Sea Dragon BDB, and of course a megascale structure for a national prestige project. Plenty of pathways if the will is there.
Ah, my very favorite launch technique, the ram accelerator. A fun variant is the laser launch tube. Maybe if the military ever gets those megawatt lasers right...
Please be careful who you quote. I didn't say that, Duane J. Oldsen did. Credit where credit is due, what?

Re: MIT Plasma Thruster Program

Posted: Tue Mar 17, 2009 5:34 am
by djolds1
JohnSmith wrote:Ah, my very favorite launch technique, the ram accelerator. A fun variant is the laser launch tube. Maybe if the military ever gets those megawatt lasers right...
Aero wrote:I saw on TV that the Pumpkin launcher (tosser) record is over 4000 feet. If we could just ramp that technology up by a factor just over 5280 times, that would make a fun launch device. Its real simple tech, too! It just uses a very long tube and a lot of compressed air.
How about 1000km long?

http://www.nas.nasa.gov/About/Education ... PBI110.HTM
http://www.islandone.org/LEOBiblio/SPBI110.HTM

Tho environmentalists would go into apoplectic conniptions at the thought.

I do like disposable one-shot ram accelerators for launching tethers for relays.