Hydrinos On Demand
Hydrinos On Demand
*
http://www.boingboing.net/2009/01/06/ar ... uasip.html
*
Black Light Power.
You can't see the power. But it is there really. Show us the money. We will show you the power. Or possibly the door. Whatever.
http://www.boingboing.net/2009/01/06/ar ... uasip.html
*
Black Light Power.
You can't see the power. But it is there really. Show us the money. We will show you the power. Or possibly the door. Whatever.
Engineering is the art of making what you want from what you can get at a profit.
So true. But then did the nonsensical phlogiston theories (by our standards) mean that.... Stuff didn't burn?vernes wrote:Apart from the well established scientific fact that an electron can not drop below the 0 position, a neutron can fall apart in a proton and an electron?
Just because Mills has a bogus theory doesn't mean he isn't leveraging legitimate phenomenon.
Clearly making a Neutron out of a proton and an electron must be extremely endothermic. But then if you could make neutrons this way then, put them together into Alphas.... wouldn't that be exothermic in total?
If Mills (and the "cold fusioneers" he is copying) are endothermically making neutrons (or some wierd analog), and these neutrons are moving into nuclei and producing alphas, then couldn't this sometimes be exothermic if indeed enough alphas are produced?
Yes, It's got to be that most of them are. They're up to their eyebrows in wishful thinking if you take them all as a group. Yet, there is something there as evidenced by the few researchers doing good science and seeing some strange results, like the SPAWAR experiments.Couldn't they just be fooling themselves - which is much more likely.
I don't care much about it, because if you give them money, they're just going to do more Electrolytic cells. There just seems to be no interesting experiments to do; There are no compelling and testable hypothesis.
-
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 8:48 pm
- Location: Maryland
I'm not so sure. Interesting things are happening. It would be nice to find out why. It could be useful.Helius wrote:Yes, It's got to be that most of them are. They're up to their eyebrows in wishful thinking if you take them all as a group. Yet, there is something there as evidenced by the few researchers doing good science and seeing some strange results, like the SPAWAR experiments.Couldn't they just be fooling themselves - which is much more likely.
I don't care much about it, because if you give them money, they're just going to do more Electrolytic cells. There just seems to be no interesting experiments to do; There are no compelling and testable hypothesis.
Engineering is the art of making what you want from what you can get at a profit.
The SPAWAR experiments raised possible questions. Anyone thinking about nuclear cross-sections would start with a very strong expectation that cold fusion cannot happen. And the lack of any replicable evidence after such a long time bears this out.
Still it is good to see that effort is put into answering the "possible questions".
Here is an interesting account of a repeat of the SPAWAR experiments with carefull analysis of whether observed pits could be of nuclear origin.
http://pages.csam.montclair.edu/~kowals ... lileo.html
the trouble with the cold fusion experiments is that the claimed evidence is either minute and calorimetric with many sources of possible experimental & methodological error, or unreplicatable, or interesting but not when viewed dispassionately pointing towards cold fusion.
Best wishes, Tom
Still it is good to see that effort is put into answering the "possible questions".
Here is an interesting account of a repeat of the SPAWAR experiments with carefull analysis of whether observed pits could be of nuclear origin.
http://pages.csam.montclair.edu/~kowals ... lileo.html
the trouble with the cold fusion experiments is that the claimed evidence is either minute and calorimetric with many sources of possible experimental & methodological error, or unreplicatable, or interesting but not when viewed dispassionately pointing towards cold fusion.
Best wishes, Tom
Bussard thought that fusion with such a device was not out of the question.tomclarke wrote:The SPAWAR experiments raised possible questions. Anyone thinking about nuclear cross-sections would start with a very strong expectation that cold fusion cannot happen. And the lack of any replicable evidence after such a long time bears this out.
Still it is good to see that effort is put into answering the "possible questions".
Here is an interesting account of a repeat of the SPAWAR experiments with carefull analysis of whether observed pits could be of nuclear origin.
http://pages.csam.montclair.edu/~kowals ... lileo.html
the trouble with the cold fusion experiments is that the claimed evidence is either minute and calorimetric with many sources of possible experimental & methodological error, or unreplicatable, or interesting but not when viewed dispassionately pointing towards cold fusion.
Best wishes, Tom
The thinking now is that it is a reaction between the "catalyst" and the D. Experiments with nickel (which absorbs H and D) tend to prove this out.
Engineering is the art of making what you want from what you can get at a profit.
IMO, Bussard's take on LENR satisfies most questions and addresses all the anomalies such as nuclear ashes and nuclear-linked contaminants in the electrolyte fluid.tomclarke wrote:The SPAWAR experiments raised possible questions. Anyone thinking about nuclear cross-sections would start with a very strong expectation that cold fusion cannot happen. And the lack of any replicable evidence after such a long time bears this out.
the trouble with the cold fusion experiments is that the claimed evidence is either minute and calorimetric with many sources of possible experimental & methodological error, or unreplicatable, or interesting but not when viewed dispassionately pointing towards cold fusion.
viewtopic.php?t=717&highlight=lenr
Vae Victis
Re: Hydrinos On Demand
Argh. Quantum physics does not work that way!the article wrote:Randell Mills, founder of BlackLight Power, claims to have invented a reactor that makes hydrogen atoms drop to an energy state below ground level