Whenever most reporters in the mainstream media claim to be unbiased and fair and balanced “journalists,” I laugh harder than I do when I’m watching Tom Brokaw read a sentence in which every word begins with the letter L. But every now and then one whips the mask off — either on purpose or by a slip of the tongue.
Others went further. According to records obtained by The Daily Caller, at several points during the 2008 presidential campaign a group of liberal journalists took radical steps to protect their favored candidate. Employees of news organizations including Time, Politico, the Huffington Post, the Baltimore Sun, the Guardian, Salon and the New Republic participated in outpourings of anger over how Obama had been treated in the media, and in some cases plotted to fix the damage.
We already knew that Jeffrey Immelt was pushing non-existent global warming so that his company could benefit from cap and trade legislation. Now we know that GE’s CEO was sitting at meetings in the White House and scolding his reporters for being hard on Obama.
According to several of McKelway’s colleagues, the newsman’s reporting may have lapsed into partisan territory when he commented live on the air about the oil industry’s influence in Washington, particularly its contributions to Democratic politicians and legislators.
Naw. Just let them go bankrupt and make all the jernalists find work as bloggers.Diogenes wrote:Journalist Fired For Talking About Obama/BP Ties
According to several of McKelway’s colleagues, the newsman’s reporting may have lapsed into partisan territory when he commented live on the air about the oil industry’s influence in Washington, particularly its contributions to Democratic politicians and legislators.
http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/journa ... mabp-ties/
My personal opinion is that many journalists need to do a stint in prison for violating campaign law. They contributed far in excess of the legally authorized amount of money to the Obama campaign in the form of Free media coverage and promotion of his agenda thereby misusing their positions of trust. Not in this particular case of course.
Their companies also need to be sued and fined by the justice department on the basis that they intentionally discriminate in hiring against people with a conservative creed.
I want revenge for Carter, Clinton and Obama, and all the destructive judges they put on the bench. I would like revenge for Wilson, Roosevelt, Truman, Kennedy and Johnson, but I know that it's too late to do anything about them other than wake people up to their destructive Legacy.MSimon wrote:Naw. Just let them go bankrupt and make all the journalists find work as bloggers.Diogenes wrote:Journalist Fired For Talking About Obama/BP Ties
According to several of McKelway’s colleagues, the newsman’s reporting may have lapsed into partisan territory when he commented live on the air about the oil industry’s influence in Washington, particularly its contributions to Democratic politicians and legislators.
http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/journa ... mabp-ties/
My personal opinion is that many journalists need to do a stint in prison for violating campaign law. They contributed far in excess of the legally authorized amount of money to the Obama campaign in the form of Free media coverage and promotion of his agenda thereby misusing their positions of trust. Not in this particular case of course.
Their companies also need to be sued and fined by the justice department on the basis that they intentionally discriminate in hiring against people with a conservative creed.
It was never about health and welfare. It was always a political tool."You know," Nixon said, " those who use drugs are the protesters. You know, the ones who get caught up in dissent and violence. They're the same group of people."
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/media/smoke.htm
I bet it gives you the warm fuzzies just thinking about it.But if you're anxious to put together a gang of goons effective enough to put a stop to it on the grounds that it's bad for you, you're just a Progressive with a slightly different agenda. The same goon-gang has the power to stop you from getting a greasy hamburger, because that's bad for you too. All the whup-ass comes from the same can, and the spoons used to dig it out are interchangeable.
http://powerandcontrol.blogspot.com/201 ... trols.html
And if you're too self-satisfied to admit that a "police force" (or an "army") is a gang of goons with snappy clothes and a cool-sounding Mission Statement, you need to go register Democrat and join the O-fellators, because you're contributing to the problem rather than finding a solution. The whole thing starts with "my goals are Good and theirs are Bad, therefore I'm entitled to beat up on Them." Then you wake up one morning and discover yourself Them, and you resent it. F* you. You built the Machine; you got nothin' when somebody else takes the controls.
To respond to both your messages, No, i'm pretty disgusted with Nixon, but compared to his predecessor he was an improvement.MSimon wrote:And G. W. Bush? You must hate him. He started scaling back the drug war. Not by much to be sure. But definitely a different direction that the previous administration. He zeroed funding for Drug Task Forces in America.
The most major thing wrong with Mexico is the mindset of the Mexicans. To my thinking, the best solution is for us to wall it off to prevent the contagion from spreading. If Mexico was populated by American attitudes, it would be a wealthy country with a large and prosperous middle class.MSimon wrote:How about foreign policy. Mexico.The drug war simply doesn't rise to a level of great concern to me.
In the e-mail sent Wednesday (see text below), Daily Breeze reporter Nick Green told consultant John S. Thomas of Thomas Partners Strategies, “Don’t call or e-mail us – we’ll call you if we’re interested. And if you haven’t got it yet, we’re not interested.”
Bob Woodruff is a reporter for ABC News who focuses on environmental issues. Woodruff’s career is the sort which convinces Americans to invest their trust in his reporting.
Unfortunately, Big Journalism has learned that Mr. Woodruff has been doing much more than objectively reporting on environmental issues.
