Page 1 of 2

realign the fusionspot

Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 1:17 pm
by wacker.popeln
when boron is attracted faster by electornball - and hydrogen differently

(Mass, and electron catch in mind)
they are also slowed down differently

lets simualte that x electornnumber/electronball size

and adjust all the injector positions for hte fusion spot
-----------------------------------------------------------

we may need to adapt the position also by differetn states of operating polywell - in single spark experiments ireelevant yet.


what you think?

any simulations taking in mind these?

Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 10:07 pm
by wacker.popeln
i uploaded it

-the bigger hte electron ball gets the more electrons density the stronger hte fields
the more this will matter

the small tesla single pulse machines are not so problematic i think

it may be even alterable dynamically during longterm operation

http://s11.postimage.org/mwl58soir/polywellquestion.png

Image[/img]

Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 10:26 pm
by wacker.popeln
i would even go so far and say

outside electronball is best place for fusion in event horizon

Posted: Sun May 13, 2012 2:40 am
by D Tibbets
I'm not sure what you are attempting to imply. Certainly the ball/ confined cloud of electrons will attract the pos. charged ions. Boron at plus 5 charge will gain KE at the same rate as would deuterium at pos 1 charge. .The hydrogen would also gain KE at the same rate. Due to the different mass to charge ratios though, it would gain more velocity. KE= 1/2 m * v^2. This causes separation of the different ions on a single pass. But the Polywell is a steady state machine. The ions pass back and forth perhaps as much as 10,000 to a million times before loss due to fusion or escape. The mixture will quickly approach a homogenous mixture of variable speed ions. Having saidthat, there does seem to be different harmonics and ion bunches that may develop passively or due to manipulation. It is a complex system that takes a wide knowledge of plasma physics to try to understand. And, even then experiment may force modification of fondly held conclusions. Field reverse configuration experiments is a example of this.

If you are assuming that the ion streams will maintain purely radial vectors and converge at the exact center and you were interested in a single pass machine, then manipulation of different ion release points/ time is certainly relevant. Bussard, Nebel, etel in the 2008 patent application even mention this possibility ("black hole effect"). But this is only as a fanciful - what if consideration. As the pos. ions pass into the electron cloud their central motion becomes dominated by inertia, and as they approach closer to the center they are slowed and/or diverted by the building positive space charge. This places a limit on the size of the "core", certainly much bigger than a point and some significant radius less than the total radius of the machine. I don't know the anticipated radius of the core, except that there has been mention that it will be of a size and resultant density that will result in most of the fusions occurring within it's volume. You could calculate this radius based on quoted central virtual anodes that reach up to ~ 20% of the virtual cathode potential well depth. That seems to be a functional limit according to Bussard.

Dan Tibbets

Posted: Sun May 13, 2012 4:23 am
by DeltaV
You can't spell "the" and you want to teach us plasma physics?

Posted: Sun May 13, 2012 10:24 am
by wacker.popeln
DeltaV wrote:You can't spell "the" and you want to teach us plasma physics?
Yes

you shouldnt be such a fool and pretend non-native speakers would be more stupid than uneducated americans.

I didnt even learn this stuff and teach you. HHAHAHAHA

Posted: Sun May 13, 2012 2:51 pm
by DeltaV
But you spelled "experiments" and "dynamically" just fine.

Is it a lysdexia thing? Learn us more.

Posted: Sun May 13, 2012 3:34 pm
by wacker.popeln
DeltaV wrote:But you spelled "experiments" and "dynamically" just fine.

Is it a lysdexia thing? teach us more.
:D
no, my ITB test before study shows im very talented in languages and text and that was before study.

its YOU THINK FASTER than the english is there, and then you shortcut the english in the lack of expressing what you mean.

with more interaction the eloquence would rise and the typical expressions would be also learned.

im confident you still m i gh t know what i mean espec wiht graphics, even without the.

:D

you think the realigned fusionspot makes sense?

Posted: Mon May 14, 2012 3:27 am
by DeltaV
Pardon us, Perfessor. Could you repeat the question in Stoogish?

Image

Posted: Mon May 14, 2012 7:40 am
by wacker.popeln
stooges. you grampy baby you.

THE TRUE GENIUS HUMOUR IS .. . . . tim. the enchanter

and hte best best of hte ancient is


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QcvjoWOwnn4

when you dont have sth productive spare me your sucker comments

Posted: Mon May 14, 2012 12:04 pm
by ladajo
wacker.popeln wrote:
DeltaV wrote:You can't spell "the" and you want to teach us plasma physics?
Yes

you shouldnt be such a fool and pretend non-native speakers would be more stupid than uneducated americans.

I didnt even learn this stuff and teach you. HHAHAHAHA
One thing about this forum is that there is no "Check EGO at the Door" sign...

Posted: Mon May 14, 2012 12:15 pm
by wacker.popeln
ladajo wrote:
wacker.popeln wrote:
One thing about this forum is that there is no "Check EGO at the Door" sign...
no can do.
id die without my ego.
it makes me being good at stuff.

and its very right. im humble enough even with it. greets

Posted: Mon May 14, 2012 12:54 pm
by DeltaV
Nyuck! Nyuck! Nyuck!

Posted: Mon May 14, 2012 2:16 pm
by wacker.popeln
DeltaV wrote:Nyuck! Nyuck! Nyuck!
fheep u
fheheeepeeedeeeeeheeeeeeeeeeeepppppp you
fhheeeeedeheheheeeeeeeeheheheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeheeeeeeeeeeeeheheep u

hehehe

Posted: Mon May 14, 2012 3:08 pm
by wacker.popeln
ehy
deltaV
waht kind of person has over 1100 posts in a forum?
i dont think thats a winners mark