Art Carlson wrote:...To maintain a non-maxwellian distribution will require electrons to be removed at one energy and replaced at another energy. At least one of those populations of electrons will have to have an energy near E_e... [/b]
Isn't that percisely what occurs in the Polywell? The electrons are acellerated by the pos magrid to ~ 12,000 eV, to provide an internal well depth of ~ 10,000eV (WB6 example). They will bounce around inside, tending to thermalize with time, but the lifetime is less than the thermalization time (relaxation time?). Befor they can thermalize fully they escape the system through a cusp, and are replaced by new mono-energetic electrons (12,000 eV). I have heard R. Busard comment that the speed of the electrons are ~ 1 billion cm per second (is that appropiate for 10,000-12,000 eV?). Is this the injection speed or the average speed? I'll assume it is the injection speed and that the average speed is ~ 1/2 this (assuming the electrons slow to low speeds as they pass through the center, then acellerate again due to mutual repulsion). Also, I have seen comments that the life time of an electron is ~ 100,000 passes or orbits befor escaping. I'm guessing that the escaping electrons are mostly cusp losses- ie they escape to the vacuum vessel wall as opposed to electrons that hit the magnet wall (diffusion?). If some percentage is recovered by recirculation then their reentry speed would be the same as the original- 12,000 eV due to the charge on the pos magrid. The escaping electrons may be faster than the injection speed and hit the wall, or they may be the same or slower speed, and recirculate/ reenter the magrid at the original 12,000 eV (reset to the original speed - I'm thinking that the terminal speed will be almost the same weather the electrons start their return journey 1 mm from the magrid, or several cm from the magrid)*.
Based on the assumptions of average electron speeds of 500,000,000 cm/s , 30 cm wide Wiffleball (larger than possible with 30 cm wide coil spacing), and 100,000 transits befor loss to the vessel wall (if this includes recirculated electrons that had been reset to the original speed, it would be even better); the average life time would be ~ 5 ms. The article I referenced above stated they were maintaining non Maxwellian distributions of the electrons in their system for 25-30 ms, so 5 ms lifetimes in the WB6 is comfortably within this limit (assumeing there is any correlation between the systems).
If confinemet times are even less due to greater than advertised cusp leaking, the time for the electrons to thermalize would be even less (at the cost of needing more electron gun provided new electrons).
* There were two ways of acellerating the original electrons mentioned by Dr Bussard. Either have the electron gun at high neg voltage with the magrid grounded, or have the electron gun at low voltage and the Magrid at high pos voltage. The diffinative experments (if you let me use that term) were done with the Magrid at high pos voltage. This is what my arguments are based on. Would a neutral grid (same potential as the vacuum vessel) possibly change the dynamics of the recirculating electrons, along with the escaping ions?
Dan Tibbets
To error is human... and I'm very human.