Please Ban Schneibster

Discuss the talk-polywell site itself, including appearance, policies, and help-wanted requests from the administrators.

Moderators: tonybarry, MSimon

GIThruster
Posts: 4686
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 8:17 pm

Please Ban Schneibster

Postby GIThruster » Tue Nov 12, 2013 1:01 am

From his first posts in this forum, Schneibster was deliberately offensive to everyone here. he is deliberately offensive in his sig, where he writes "get over it" to everyone, whether they have shared a thought or not. He bragged about his bans in other forums and how he was at PopSci until that forum closed its doors due to all the squabbling (most caused by Schneibster himself.) He followed on that emotionally disturbed approach to this venerable forum with outlandish and unfounded charges or racism, sick epithets of his own and lies about admin that he had been threatened. Ever since he has remained far more than contentious, but seriously emotionally disturbed and continuing to write hundreds of posts each week, most for no reason other than to offend others.

Several of our brightest bulbs have left and many more are on their way out the door. So let me ask, why is Schneibster allowed to remain, when he has had every day, as destructive an effect on the forum as he can. It is obvious this is his entire intention, so why is he allowed to remain?
"Courage is not just a virtue, but the form of every virtue at the testing point." C. S. Lewis

Stubby
Posts: 877
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2012 4:05 pm

Re: Please Ban Schneibster

Postby Stubby » Tue Nov 12, 2013 3:23 am

One: he has not offended everyone.
Two: He is on your foe list so why are you still reading his stuff?
Three: 2 words : Private message.
Last edited by Stubby on Tue Nov 12, 2013 10:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Everything is bullshit unless proven otherwise. -A.C. Beddoe

GIThruster
Posts: 4686
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 8:17 pm

Re: Please Ban Schneibster

Postby GIThruster » Tue Nov 12, 2013 9:43 pm

I only read his stuff when others quote it to argue with him.

You only read his stuff because like you, he thrives on injuring others--one sick person supporting another.
"Courage is not just a virtue, but the form of every virtue at the testing point." C. S. Lewis

hanelyp
Posts: 2214
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 8:50 pm

Re: Please Ban Schneibster

Postby hanelyp » Tue Nov 12, 2013 9:56 pm

Stubby wrote:One: he has not offended everyone.

I found his very first message offensive. When the offense was pointed out his reply was a more directed insult. That was enough to convince me he had nothing worth reading.
The daylight is uncomfortably bright for eyes so long in the dark.

Stubby
Posts: 877
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2012 4:05 pm

Re: Please Ban Schneibster

Postby Stubby » Tue Nov 12, 2013 10:15 pm

Hello,
I'm not a physicist either, but anyway here's my take on this:

The 0.1 microsecond refers to the electron lifetime in WB6, whereas 100'000 recirculation are required for net power.
I don't know about thermalization. I think Dr. Bussard mentioned in the IAC paper that it could become a problem if electron confinement gets to good, but he doesn't seem to think it would be a problem at the proposed reactor size.


You found this offensive?
Everything is bullshit unless proven otherwise. -A.C. Beddoe

GIThruster
Posts: 4686
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 8:17 pm

Re: Please Ban Schneibster

Postby GIThruster » Tue Nov 12, 2013 10:58 pm

I'm sure he's talking about the post where he insulted everyone in the forum and then went on to pick a fight with anyone who does not agree with him on any of several issues.

It doesn't take a brain surgeon to see that anyone who uses their sig as an opportunity to insult others, is not here for the right reasons. Obviously you and the troll have a great deal in common in this regard. It's no surprise the two emotionally disturbed theist bashers here are banded together, and that the more stabile atheists want nothing to do with them.
Last edited by GIThruster on Tue Nov 12, 2013 11:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"Courage is not just a virtue, but the form of every virtue at the testing point." C. S. Lewis

Stubby
Posts: 877
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2012 4:05 pm

Re: Please Ban Schneibster

Postby Stubby » Tue Nov 12, 2013 11:09 pm

Again he didn't insulted everyone on the forum, not even close. You are assuming facts not in evidence.
Everything is bullshit unless proven otherwise. -A.C. Beddoe

Betruger
Posts: 2305
Joined: Tue May 06, 2008 11:54 am

Re: Please Ban Schneibster

Postby Betruger » Wed Nov 13, 2013 4:44 am

Stubby wrote:
Hello,
I'm not a physicist either, but anyway here's my take on this:

The 0.1 microsecond refers to the electron lifetime in WB6, whereas 100'000 recirculation are required for net power.
I don't know about thermalization. I think Dr. Bussard mentioned in the IAC paper that it could become a problem if electron confinement gets to good, but he doesn't seem to think it would be a problem at the proposed reactor size.


You found this offensive?

Don't be obtuse. Obviously that's not the post. Hanelyp means his first post since being away for months/years.

If you consider having Schneibster instead of Ladajo a positive, arguing any of this is a waste of time. Is his website "fact not in evidence"? There's no way you can say with a straight face that his behavior doesn't reek. This oughta have been enough of a red flag for any sensible reader:
Schneibster wrote:thread likes and post likes.
ignore function is a bit too harsh for effective education.
it would make it easier to [...] disindoctrinate
Coming from socialist country, this sorta stuff just boils my blood.

Schneibster wrote:So everyone is aware, Joe has threatened to kick me off if I don't lie and say I think the deniers are correct.
I refuse to do this categorically. My honor is worth considerably more than my interest in posting on a site infested with liars who whine to management when their lies are denied by reality.
And yet his own website is precisely the opposite - schadenfreudian garbage which unless my english is that bad, is opposite honorable.
And yet he kept posting to the point that often enough a large majority of thread starts and last replies had his name on em. He's not just occasionally on but all round the clock with his venomous tripe. He lives for this kind of crap just like scum-sucking animals you see on Jerry Springer etc live for it despite their perpetual pretense that they don't.
Image ..And so on.
You can do anything you want with laws except make Americans obey them. | What I want to do is to look up S. . . . I call him the Schadenfreudean Man.

kunkmiester
Posts: 856
Joined: Thu Mar 12, 2009 3:51 pm
Contact:

Re: Please Ban Schneibster

Postby kunkmiester » Wed Nov 13, 2013 8:17 am

Another reason for more subforums--get the political crap out of the way, so those who don't really want to see it don't have to. Maybe a trash subforum too to move some of the drivel into so it doesn't crowd out the rest of the forums.
Evil is evil, no matter how small

KitemanSA
Posts: 6113
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 3:05 pm
Location: OlyPen WA

Re: Please Ban Schneibster

Postby KitemanSA » Sat Nov 16, 2013 6:11 am

I have "foe"d him and still find him odeous. He is not as bad as the last guy banned, but isn't too far from it.

TDPerk
Posts: 943
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2007 12:55 pm
Location: Northern Shen. Valley, VA
Contact:

Re: Please Ban Schneibster

Postby TDPerk » Sun Nov 24, 2013 1:02 am

Has he in fact been banned, or did he expire?
molon labe
montani semper liberi
para fides paternae patria


Return to “Administration”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests