The facts are already on the side of the notion, that there is no corelation between human released CO2 and global climate temperature change. They are in the business of finding and providing to the economy petrochemical energy as a first order business priority, and subsequently available chemical feedstock as a secondary priority. Until and unless business policies make it implausible that they can pass costs on to their customers, why should they enter into any unrelated fields of research?happyjack27 wrote:it's a wonder, too, why they're pouring all of their money into such quakery, rather than doing actual legitimate scientific research. you'd think if the facts were on their side -- which presumably they are (there clearly isn't any conflict of interest) -- with the enormous money they spend on preaching the controversy, they could produce tons of quality verifiable scientific research proving that everything we know about chemistry, thermodynamics, meteorology, quantum physics, astronomy, electromagnetics, etc... is wrong. curious that with all that capital dedicated towards "finding the truth", the ends of their labor are quite literally laughable! it's almost as if... dare i say it... reality doesn't fit into their narrative.
The hilarious named Schott Glass AG, does not do research on clear petro derived polymers either. What of it in either case?