Re: LENR Is Real
Posted: Sun Nov 15, 2015 6:56 am
paperburn1 wrote:Ah finally an explanation I understand.
https://www.facebook.com/16260767043358 ... 904889444/
paperburn1 wrote:Ah finally an explanation I understand.
https://www.facebook.com/16260767043358 ... 904889444/
There have been two independent tests I know about away from Rossi's factory. Both conducted by people who had a strong interest in getting positive results - so not that independent. Other offered independent tests (e.g. NASA who also strongly hoped for positive results, UoB who equally wanted to test properly) were refused by Rossi.Nothing will convince you short of commercial sales.
Parallel's "good theory".Originally, I found this idea in the Ukrainian literature and was skeptical. So, we verified it by doing a direct numerical solution of the time-dependent Schrodinger Equation for a single nuclear particle in a parabolic energy well. These oscillations in spatial spread will periodically delocalize the nucleus and facilitate the tunneling of adjacent nuclei into the Strong Force attractive nuclear potential well, giving rise to nuclear fusion at rates that are several tens of orders of magnitude larger than what one calculates via the usual Gamow Factor integral relationship.
.There have been two independent tests I know about away from Rossi's factory. Both conducted by people who had a strong interest in getting positive results - so not that independent
What actually Tom said is that there is no "logic" nor "a sound math" proof for a LENR theory, and he illustrated you a quick example of one of his concerns regarding your "best theory out there"parallel wrote:Tom,
You mean there is no theory that you agree with, not what you said, there was no theory. Hardly a surprise as you think LENR impossible.
Getting investment money is not same as having a viable product. History is full of such examples, so full that I wonder how come that there are still people like you who can't understand this basic rule.parallel wrote:What no comment on Woodford Equity doing due diligence before investing $49 million?
That's because nothing has been shown till now except empty words and meaningless reports/papers. What other criteria we can use to evaluate Mr. Rossi claims? Hope? Trust? Belief?parallel wrote:As I repeat again, nothing will persuade you short of commercial sales.
If you can't debate it, mock it?paperburn1 wrote:Ah finally an explanation I understand.
Parkhomov claimed to have positive results on testing something like Rossi's Lugano device. Ironically, the Lugano device did not work even from its own data, so this is not a very good start.I suppose you think Parkhomov in Russia is not independent.
The problem is that you do not know what is the DD that the Woodford fund actually did. They are not scientists, and I'd guess they relied on the scientific evidence as presented to them by Rossi. In this case there is no published data other than arxiv (Ferrara) and UoB (Lugano). They probably take these test results together with Rossi's year long test as good DD. We now know now that the second and most careful of these two tests has a null result, but that information was not available to them when they made their decision.What no comment on Woodford Equity doing due diligence before investing $49 million? Obviously we should take your opinion over someone that has actually examined the plant. Even though you have never been near it.
Did you listen to Darden's recent speech? He says that IH is one of his many long-term investments in LENR.That he adopts a hands-off stance. He is a true LENR believer and he backs people to come up with the goods eventually, with no timeframe.BY the way, the investment was in Tom Darden's Industrial Heat, so it seems he has not tired of it, as you wrote.
Well seriously speaking, if you can debate it with a valid technical or logic argument I will be happy and curious to hear it.KitemanSA wrote:If you can't debate it, mock it?paperburn1 wrote:Ah finally an explanation I understand.
Very well. Here is what will happen then (I'm making a prediction)Wait until Feb/Mar 2016 and then we will see who is right.