Re: LENR Is Real
Posted: Tue Nov 29, 2016 4:14 pm
Feel the walls closing in on you liar ladajo?
http://www.e-catworld.com/2016/11/28/sc ... t-results/
http://www.e-catworld.com/2016/11/28/sc ... t-results/
a discussion forum for Polywell fusion
parallel wrote:This takes place well after the 1 MW plant trial. Perhaps IH is not as pessimistic about Rossi's technology as the court case would suggest.
https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/index. ... th-Caroli/
is that Rossiclown is grasping for straws in his Answer preparation. He has demonstrated a really bad habit of 'discussing' the court case all-the-while claiming his lawyers told him to keep his yap shut. There are several Rossiclown Sock Puppet posts over the last week or so tipping his hand to possible Answer arguments he may make. As I have seen over the last years, one of the functions of the JONP Sock Puppet Extravaganza is to fish for ideas from the Worshipers to help him spin his stories, as well as taint the water for future scamming. There are many examples of this that have been circulated here and elsewhere.giuseppe
November 28, 2016 at 10:08 PM
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
Probably you do not know that Mr La Gatta, of ENEA, Italian taxpayer maintained concern, is now working for IH in Raleigh. They are trying to make up a competition against you, using the information IH gave to La Gatta and ENEA to replicate your technology. This all is finalized to get from Italian Government funds graciously supplied from the taxpayer of Italy, to steal your technology, and, at the same time, to fool the investors of IH, Cherokee Fund Partners and Woodford, making them believe that there is a big team making big things, where big things stand for stealing your IP.
From an insider,
have a great week, Andrea!
November 27, 2016 at 5:36 PM
Dr Andrea Rossi:
1- was property of the ERV the flowmeter by means of which have been made the measurements on the 1 MW plant?
2- did the ERV himself install it?
3- have ever been installed beside it any other flowmeters by IH or Leonardo?
November 27, 2016 at 5:59 PM
November 27, 2016 at 3:48 PM
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
look at this: Chile’s government has started a R&D on LENR, Bill Gates has started an R&D on LENR, in Europe in Italy the association of engineers has started a permanent updating course on LENR, and in France Airbus has started an R&D on LENR, in Russia after Dr Parkhomov has been started an R&D on LENR, in China the Atomic Institute has started an R&D on LENR, in Japan Mitsubishi has started an R&D on LENR, in South Korea Hiunday has started an R&D on LENR, etc, etc: all this thanks to your immense work: before your test of January 2011 LENR were ridiculized from the very people that today are financing all these R&Ds. This too is a legacy of yours.
Please continue your great job,
November 27, 2016 at 4:18 PM
November 27, 2016 at 10:42 AM
Many still don’t understand Darden/IH’s move in not paying you your 90 million. It just doesn’t make business sense?
Here is one scenario mentioned:
“To get the data cheap and then kill off the technology path to public access and hide the technology behind a pay wall. The permanent enslavement of the human race to high-cost energy in a free energy world.”
What are your thoughts on this?
November 27, 2016 at 12:09 PM
November 26, 2016 at 7:54 AM
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi
Is somebody already visiting the QuarkX in operation?
November 26, 2016 at 11:39 AM
No, apart the Team and persons involved in the R&D under NDA.
November 25, 2016 at 7:16 PM
Hello Dr Rossi,
Interesting post about Neil Woodfords investment into ColdFusion – So if it does not work as
IH and Thomas Darden claim then what of Woodford Funds investment?
https://ftalphaville.ft.com/2016/11/25/ ... n-company/
November 25, 2016 at 10:43 PM
Woodford visited the plant during the test in February 2015 and in September 2015: when they invested 50 million dollars in IH the sole license and intellectual property that IH had was the one of Leonardo Corporation. The top level officers that Woodford sent to visit the plant during the test had at their disposal the first and the second querterly report made by the ERV. The fourth and last quarterly report, as well as the third, were substantially equal to the first and the second. IH has also paid the invoices related to the first, the second and the third report of the ERV. Eventually, they did not pay the fourth report, because they said it was not correct. But it was equal to the former three, related to the period during which IH collected funds from their investors. At the end of the second visit to the plant of 1 MW during the test, in September 2015, the senior officer of Woodford said to me the following precise words: ” Congratulations, Dr Rossi, we saw great stuff here”.
November 25, 2016 at 5:31 AM
As of today, how many probabilities are there that within February 2017 important information will be released concerning your work?
November 25, 2016 at 1:27 PM
I’d say between 60 and 70%.
November 25, 2016 at 5:33 AM
Dr Andrea Rossi,
I appreciate your answer to Bob Dylan. By the way, we can also observe that the potential to make work of the entropy decreases in time, therefore the probabilities to make order decrease in time.
November 25, 2016 at 1:26 PM
It is true.
November 24, 2016 at 9:25 AM
Dr Andrea Rossi
Which is your meditation for Thanksgiving Day?
November 24, 2016 at 1:02 PM
I use to rehearse daily on the foundamentals of Physics, to have them always at hand, and today was dedicated to the concept of entropy, related to the second law of thermodynamics.
For the first time I discovered here another evidence of the work of God. Think to entropy: its concept is based on the fact that the disorder unavoidably tends to increase, if a force does not intervene to put order, because the number of disordered combinations is infinite, while the number of combinations that allow an ordered system are very limited.
This having been said, just follow me: if I get in the Universe random matter and casual forces, the probabilities that it turns out casually a Universe with the harmony of laws that we know are zero, because the probabilities of it, under a mathematical point of view, are not existent as well as it is impossible that the entropy proceeds spontaneously toward a major order than before the initial observation. Let me make an example: if I pour the ink from a glass into a series of paper sheets, the probability that all I get is stained papers is 100% ( second law of thermodynamics-> Entropy ), while the probabilities that the falling ink goes, without any control from outside, to organize itself to form a poem of Shakespeare or a song of Bob Dylan are 0%, or, to be more precise, zero point many, many zeroes before a 1.
To say that some form of Divinity does not exist is not just “wrong”: it is anti-scientific, because it violates the second thermodynamic law.
November 24, 2016 at 7:21 AM
Mr Andrea Rossi
Are you working also today?
November 24, 2016 at 7:54 AM
Right now I am with the QuarkX, will remain for several hours, then I will celebrate my Thanksgiving to God.
Special Irony in this one given the "puppets" comment...Dennis Smith
November 24, 2016 at 7:22 AM
Dr Andrea Rossi
If I have well understood, you alternate the on and off switch period of the Quarkxes to have a constant power, but, at the same time, a proper cooling period for each Quarkx. Your problem is that you have a too high temperature in a too small volume, so that the heat exchanging surface is not enough to remove the heat on time before the meltdown. Did I get it?
Have a great Thanksgiving Day,
November 24, 2016 at 7:53 AM
You are correct.
November 23, 2016 at 5:59 AM
Dr Andrea Rossi,
The puppets, not having other arguments, are retrieving the story about the problems you had in Italy 30 years ago…they stink!
Do not care and continue your great job
November 23, 2016 at 3:17 PM
For a complete understanding of it, please go to
Also the books of Mats Lewan ( An Impossible Invention ) and of Vessela Nikolova ( Ecat The New Fire ) give good information about it.
Most critiques on Parkhomov have shown that he revamped his data to make it look better, in an iterative manner, based on critiques he was getting.JoeP wrote:Too bad, I was kind of hoping to see some discussion on Parkhomov.
I don't follow these Rossi replications, what little I bother to read are excerpts or links here, but the last I heard is that Parkhomov claimed some small excess heat replication and then later was providing info to the the MFMP group on their replication attempts. I think I read good critique from Tom Clarke on Mats Lewan's blog on that, or Rossi's experiments around the same time frame. Then some months after many failures the MFMP claimed to have a brief period of COP 1.2 with some xray emission burst with one of their "glow stick" experiments. Then nothing. Anything new here?
This is really so funny. It never occurred to me to make a search on the namesladajo wrote:I could keep going but I think I made my point, and this is only from the past week...
Lookup others from the last two weeks, like:
Alessandro Toninelli (Italian Basketball)
Carli Lloyd (Soccer)
Tyler Bozak (NHL)
Russell West (brook) (NBA - Rossi may have truncated the name...)
Kyrie Irving (NBA)
Lucas Digne (France Soccer)
Hines Ward(y) (NFL - Rossi may have added the "y"...)
Ezekiel Elliott (NFL)
Cary Williams (NFL)
Jonas Gray (NFL)...
Mario Lemieux (NHL)
Bruce Gradkowski (NFL)
Malcolm Butler (NFL)
Michael Thomas (NFL)
Kenbrell Thompkins (NFL)
And the list goes on...
paperburn1 wrote:Attempt at duplication
2015 time frame?
Interesting setup. I like how they tried Palladium as well. A more formal report with more detail would be useful, however this is a decent(ish) summary.After more than 20 experiments with nickel and LiAlH4 in different configurations,
within the precision of the calorimeter of +/- 2 Watts, no excess heat was measured.
While someone certainly could be baiting Rossiclown with Sock Puppets, the question at the root is: Why?Regarding American footballers on jonp
zeus46 wrote:Shane D. wrote:I reckon it's 50:50 that someone is reading these threads and sniggering at people's gullibility.What you describe as 'piling on' is what I describe as 'unquestioningly parroting things you are told'.I know you (Peter Gluck also) don't like us piling on, or making fun of Rossi,
It's funny how so called skeptics are never skeptical of things or ideas that agree with their beliefs.
I think the person most likely to be writing these comments is actually the person who 'exposed' them in the first place... So either that Ladajo, or FredZ777 - an aggressive and odd individual (with links to IH) who makes even Thomas Clarke seem "balanced" (as Lewan would probably say).
Post was edited 3 times, last by “zeus46” (An hour ago).
darn_right _man likes this.
Oops, seems the puppet master was tired and didn't properly tie the Tee-up to the swing...Lupe
September 30, 2016 at 4:49 AM
Please give us our daily update of the Quarkx’s development!
December 1, 2016 at 8:54 AM
Thank you for your concern.
Yes, whatever happens to me the IP is safe.