The Super Supercapacitor.

Point out news stories, on the net or in mainstream media, related to polywell fusion.

Moderators: tonybarry, MSimon

Diogenes
Posts: 6968
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 3:33 pm

The Super Supercapacitor.

Post by Diogenes »

‘What all the wise men promised has not happened, and what all the damned fools said would happen has come to pass.’
— Lord Melbourne —

GIThruster
Posts: 4686
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 8:17 pm

Re: The Super Supercapacitor.

Post by GIThruster »

This loaner 'puter I'm on can't play falsh of any sort--just locks up the machine. I trust this is more about the folks at UCLA using a lightscribe to sinter graphene onto CD's and DVD discs?

Any numbers yet for bulk capacitors as compared to LiPo batteries?
"Courage is not just a virtue, but the form of every virtue at the testing point." C. S. Lewis

ladajo
Posts: 6258
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 11:18 pm
Location: North East Coast

Re: The Super Supercapacitor.

Post by ladajo »

Yes, they quickly show the 'how they made graphene' bit. But then move into the, 'holy crap' it is an awesome capacitor. A small sheet about 1inch square single layer (each side) in a flat capacitor configuration, is shown to be charged for a couple of seconds, and then run an LED(?) lamp for up to 5 minutes.

You could push a good spark if you rolled up a sheet of it I would think...
The development of atomic power, though it could confer unimaginable blessings on mankind, is something that is dreaded by the owners of coal mines and oil wells. (Hazlitt)
What I want to do is to look up C. . . . I call him the Forgotten Man. (Sumner)

bcglorf
Posts: 436
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 2:58 pm

Re: The Super Supercapacitor.

Post by bcglorf »

So, if it can charge crazy fast and discharge over time, and we can make it dirt cheap, can these be used for power generation? Build an array of a couple thousand or even million of them and hook the charging end up to a lightening rod or the post in town hall?

hanelyp
Posts: 2261
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 8:50 pm

Re: The Super Supercapacitor.

Post by hanelyp »

If the described capacitors can be made in volume cheap enough, applications for matching supply to load would be extensive.
The daylight is uncomfortably bright for eyes so long in the dark.

Diogenes
Posts: 6968
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 3:33 pm

Re: The Super Supercapacitor.

Post by Diogenes »

bcglorf wrote:So, if it can charge crazy fast and discharge over time, and we can make it dirt cheap, can these be used for power generation? Build an array of a couple thousand or even million of them and hook the charging end up to a lightening rod or the post in town hall?

I haven't heard what the dielectric breakdown is, but I would be surprised if it were very high. Not sure sufficient banks of supercaps could be created to grab a lightning bolt, and even if this were dooable, i'm thinking there would be a repeatability issue.

Might be resolved by laser induced plasma path in a known lightning strike area.


Cheap/small supercaps will certainly open up some new horizons.
‘What all the wise men promised has not happened, and what all the damned fools said would happen has come to pass.’
— Lord Melbourne —

JoeP
Posts: 524
Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2011 5:10 am

Re: The Super Supercapacitor.

Post by JoeP »

Thanks for posting the story. Very interesting development and creative use of a DVD burner with the inherent precision to cheaply manufacture these. Another article link: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/20 ... 100755.htm


I assume that leakage is still one of the major hurdles. I'm curious as to how well these hold charge.

ladajo
Posts: 6258
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 11:18 pm
Location: North East Coast

Re: The Super Supercapacitor.

Post by ladajo »

Why would leakage be a hurdle?
Existing dielectrics seem fine. Especially for normal applications. The graphene would seem a nice cheap and low mass/volume alternative to existing charge plates/films.
The development of atomic power, though it could confer unimaginable blessings on mankind, is something that is dreaded by the owners of coal mines and oil wells. (Hazlitt)
What I want to do is to look up C. . . . I call him the Forgotten Man. (Sumner)

GIThruster
Posts: 4686
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 8:17 pm

Re: The Super Supercapacitor.

Post by GIThruster »

Did they give a specific energy density as compared to LiPo's?
"Courage is not just a virtue, but the form of every virtue at the testing point." C. S. Lewis

paperburn1
Posts: 2484
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2009 5:53 am
Location: Third rock from the sun.

Re: The Super Supercapacitor.

Post by paperburn1 »

The thing that got my attention Using this technique, we have been able to produce more than 100 micro-supercapacitors on a single disc in less than 30 minutes, using inexpensive materials."
I am not a nuclear physicist, but play one on the internet.

JoeP
Posts: 524
Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2011 5:10 am

Re: The Super Supercapacitor.

Post by JoeP »

ladajo wrote:Why would leakage be a hurdle?
Existing dielectrics seem fine. Especially for normal applications. The graphene would seem a nice cheap and low mass/volume alternative to existing charge plates/films.
I'm not current on the latest capacitor specs, it was just my recollection that most capacitors has self-discharge rates that were inferior to batteries. That, and energy density was another thing that needed improvement.

skippy
Posts: 3
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2011 2:34 am

Re: The Super Supercapacitor.

Post by skippy »

GIThruster wrote:Did they give a specific energy density as compared to LiPo's?
I found a bug on the Nature website and was able to read part of the paper. It looked like their highest energy design had about 10^-2 Wh/cc. That's about two orders of magnitude lower than Li-ions. They could be nice caps for other reasons --I didn't study the paper that closely. But it doesn't look like their energy density is going to even be able to challenge existing battery chemistry (unsurprisingly).

mvanwink5
Posts: 2146
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 5:07 am
Location: N.C. Mountains

Re: The Super Supercapacitor.

Post by mvanwink5 »

Skippy,
Thanks for finding that. Like you, I am not surprised at the energy density being low relative to battery tech. I became suspicious when it was not mentioned in bold headlines. I guess it must be the form factor or ability to put it on a board, plus durability / longevity. Maybe they can do something with it with development work, but it seems the key is the dielectric.
Counting the days to commercial fusion. It is not that long now.

ladajo
Posts: 6258
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 11:18 pm
Location: North East Coast

Re: The Super Supercapacitor.

Post by ladajo »

Maybe they can come up with an "anti-graphene" as the ultimate super lightweight insulator and dielectric.
The development of atomic power, though it could confer unimaginable blessings on mankind, is something that is dreaded by the owners of coal mines and oil wells. (Hazlitt)
What I want to do is to look up C. . . . I call him the Forgotten Man. (Sumner)

GIThruster
Posts: 4686
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 8:17 pm

Re: The Super Supercapacitor.

Post by GIThruster »

IIRC it is. Graphene only conducts along its surface. It doesn't pass charge through, So technically it is both a conductor and an insulator. At just a few atoms thick though, you can't differentially charge the surfaces as that would be way too much field for its dielectric strength. What you can to though is make electrodes that are just a few atoms thick. The real issue with the folks making it with a Lightscribe is they found a cheap process for manufacturing it.
"Courage is not just a virtue, but the form of every virtue at the testing point." C. S. Lewis

Post Reply