SpaceX News

Point out news stories, on the net or in mainstream media, related to polywell fusion.

Moderators: tonybarry, MSimon

krenshala
Posts: 910
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2008 4:20 pm
Location: Austin, TX, NorAm, Sol III

Re: SpaceX News

Postby krenshala » Tue Jun 04, 2019 3:42 pm

At the end of their useful lives, the satellites will use their ion thrusters to crash back into the Earth’s atmosphere, burning up, and thus preventing them from becoming space debris.

Just one nit to pick - the sats won't use their ion thrusters to deorbit. To deorbit, they will stop using their ion thrusters for station-keeping, and let atmospheric drag deorbit them in a matter of weeks to months (depending on their specific altitude).

Maui
Posts: 574
Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2008 12:10 am
Location: Madison, WI

Re: SpaceX News

Postby Maui » Tue Jun 04, 2019 10:44 pm

Are you sure about that? I know I've seen conversation about how the Starlink sats will actively de-orbit... though I have to admit I can't find an actual source behind that conversation for the moment.

It doesn't make sense to me why you wouldn't. I imagine with an active de-orbit you could likely have some degree of confidence in hitting an ocean rather than land (current versions don't 100% disintegrate). Plus, even if you are even saving a couple of weeks, if you have the thrusters, why not?

Skipjack
Posts: 6002
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 2:29 pm

Re: SpaceX News

Postby Skipjack » Tue Jun 04, 2019 11:03 pm

Maui wrote:Are you sure about that? I know I've seen conversation about how the Starlink sats will actively de-orbit... though I have to admit I can't find an actual source behind that conversation for the moment.

It doesn't make sense to me why you wouldn't. I imagine with an active de-orbit you could likely have some degree of confidence in hitting an ocean rather than land (current versions don't 100% disintegrate). Plus, even if you are even saving a couple of weeks, if you have the thrusters, why not?

I too have a vague memory that the passive de- orbit is only meant for those satellites that fail for some reason or another. The others will be actively de- orbited at the end of their lifetime.

krenshala
Posts: 910
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2008 4:20 pm
Location: Austin, TX, NorAm, Sol III

Re: SpaceX News

Postby krenshala » Thu Jun 06, 2019 5:10 pm

Okay, now that you mention it, I think you're both right that passive deorbit was just a side benefit of the altitude, but not their actual plan. Still, its nice to know that even if they didn't actively deorbit the satellites, they will (relatively) rapidly fall out of the sky once they run out of fuel and/or stop functioning.

Maui
Posts: 574
Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2008 12:10 am
Location: Madison, WI

Re: SpaceX News

Postby Maui » Fri Jun 07, 2019 4:54 pm

Right. I think one of the reasons they are launched below their operational orbit it to help ensure any DOA satellites de-orbit that much faster.
Image

kunkmiester
Posts: 872
Joined: Thu Mar 12, 2009 3:51 pm
Contact:

Re: SpaceX News

Postby kunkmiester » Fri Jun 07, 2019 7:07 pm

Read an article recently on Europe's launch systems. It talked about what I recall was like a decade of plans, but no mention at all of developing a reusable rocket in the Falcon vein. Blew my mind.
Evil is evil, no matter how small

Skipjack
Posts: 6002
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 2:29 pm

Re: SpaceX News

Postby Skipjack » Sat Jun 08, 2019 3:06 am

kunkmiester wrote:Read an article recently on Europe's launch systems. It talked about what I recall was like a decade of plans, but no mention at all of developing a reusable rocket in the Falcon vein. Blew my mind.

They do have plans for something like Falcon 9. First step is a "Grasshopper" like experimental rocket. Of course it is a joint European project, so the whole thing will move at a snail's pace. By the time they have their Grasshopper, SpaceX will have landed on Mars...

JLawson
Posts: 421
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2008 6:31 pm
Location: Georgia
Contact:

Re: SpaceX News

Postby JLawson » Mon Jun 10, 2019 4:30 pm

They do have plans for something like Falcon 9. First step is a "Grasshopper" like experimental rocket. Of course it is a joint European project, so the whole thing will move at a snail's pace. By the time they have their Grasshopper, SpaceX will have landed on Mars...


That's making the assumption that they actually WANT a space program, instead of a budget item that can be stretched out eternally but doesn't need results. Kind of like NASA and the SLS - as long as it never flies they're good. If it flies and fails, then they'll have to justify the money wasted in development, but they'll probably get more to work the kinks out. If it flies and succeeds, they're going to be forced to justify why it took so long and so much money, and why they don't have the next one in the pipeline to be ready for flight in 6 months. (Pulling out arbitrary time frame there.)

As long as they can delay, they're good.

Whereas Musk just keeps on going. It's remarkable what can happen once you've got one man basically deciding what's going to be done and on what schedule instead of an unaccountable committee, isn't it?
When opinion and reality conflict - guess which one is going to win in the long run.

Maui
Posts: 574
Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2008 12:10 am
Location: Madison, WI

Re: SpaceX News

Postby Maui » Fri Jun 14, 2019 5:23 pm

It does appear they are now actively de-orbiting one of the Starlink satellites:
https://twitter.com/planet4589/status/1 ... 8001314816

Regarding ESA, they are actually now dipping their toes in a commercial launch provider program as well:
https://www.esa.int/Our_Activities/Spac ... n_services


Return to “News”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests