Researchers at the Georgia Institute of Technology and the University of Alabama have received a $2.5 million grant from the U.S. Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR) to conduct fundamental research into the ways in which plasmas interact with the walls of the structures containing them. The research will also examine potential improvements to materials used for the walls.
Plasma Wall Interactions
Plasma Wall Interactions
http://www.ecnmag.com/News/2011/09/Air- ... eractions/
Engineering is the art of making what you want from what you can get at a profit.
-
- Posts: 1439
- Joined: Wed Jul 14, 2010 5:27 pm
just your basic nuclear materials testing. probably for increasing the expected lifespan of a tokamak - a major limiting factor in the economic feasibility.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_Test_Reactor
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_Test_Reactor
-
- Posts: 1439
- Joined: Wed Jul 14, 2010 5:27 pm
Precisely. At least for the NIF. IF they push to a power producing pulsed laser system and stick with gold horboliums (sp?), they will be vaporizing and to a small extent transmuting ~ a BB sized chunk of gold at up to perhaps a hundred shots per second. This may approximate ~ 1 once of gold per second, or almost $2,000 per second, $ 120,000 per minute or almost $3,000,000 per hr in gold consumption alone. How much of this can be recovered. How much will be deposited on the vessel walls. Removing it will require concentrated nitric acid which will not be kind to the underlieing metal, unless some other clever mechanism can be used. Without high efficiency recycling a couple of plants might burn through the entire worlds gold supply in only a few years. The only substitute high density metal that I speculate might work at lower cost and greater abundance might be lead, silver, tin, tungsten, or even mercury. Uranium , and thorium would have induced radiation problems, Could the system be made to work with a lighter metal such as aluminum, iron, nickel or copper? Osmium or platinum would cost even more than the gold.rcain wrote:perhaps a very thick pot. sacrificial, or reformed/recycled somehow. electrochemically perhaps.happyjack27 wrote:lol. if you can't keep the pot from melting, just buy a new one every meal, right?rcain wrote:... when you've given up trying to 'contain' plasma any other way...
Dan Tibbets
To error is human... and I'm very human.
-
- Posts: 869
- Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2010 2:04 pm
- Location: Summerville SC, USA
.
Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2010 5:19 pm
Say it after me: "Hole Rowm". Now say it again. Write it a few times, just for fun...
viewtopic.php?t=2661&start=0
Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2010 5:19 pm
Dan, Did you write "horboliums" just to get me to respond? You are consistent in your humanity, I must say.rjaypeters wrote:horboliums => Hohlraum?
Say it after me: "Hole Rowm". Now say it again. Write it a few times, just for fun...
viewtopic.php?t=2661&start=0
"Aqaba! By Land!" T. E. Lawrence
R. Peters
R. Peters
Exactly my view of the situations as well. It is an absolutely ridiculous concept. If you ask me, it is all about the weapons applications of this, not about any serious research into fusion energy. That is just a means to sell it to the gullible public, so they keep the dollars flowing.Precisely. At least for the NIF. IF they push to a power producing pulsed laser system and stick with gold horboliums (sp?), they will be vaporizing and to a small extent transmuting ~ a BB sized chunk of gold at up to perhaps a hundred shots per second. This may approximate ~ 1 once of gold per second, or almost $2,000 per second, $ 120,000 per minute or almost $3,000,000 per hr in gold consumption alone. How much of this can be recovered. How much will be deposited on the vessel walls. Removing it will require concentrated nitric acid which will not be kind to the underlieing metal, unless some other clever mechanism can be used. Without high efficiency recycling a couple of plants might burn through the entire worlds gold supply in only a few years. The only substitute high density metal that I speculate might work at lower cost and greater abundance might be lead, silver, tin, tungsten, or even mercury. Uranium , and thorium would have induced radiation problems, Could the system be made to work with a lighter metal such as aluminum, iron, nickel or copper? Osmium or platinum would cost even more than the gold.
-
- Posts: 1439
- Joined: Wed Jul 14, 2010 5:27 pm