Representatives push for DOD investment in renewable energy
-
- Posts: 2039
- Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2011 4:30 am
Thanks, I did not know.ladajo wrote:Micro wind turbines are already in use and have been by military units. What they have bought is unit and mission dependant.
I have found for example this: http://windpoweruk.com/300W-portable.html
Is this (50kWh of energy per month) enough for application we are discussing? If turbine produces 300W only if wind speed exceeds 12m/s?The 300w portable wind turbine can supply about 50kWh of energy per month
Net Weight 12.5kg
And at lower speed power is much lower.
For example at 6m/s generator produces only about 90W (see graf)
There are some newer blade designs that are much smaller composite units, that work realy well at a low diazmter low speed. Sufficient for battery charging for sure.
Think about how well these work in the mountains of afghanistan and other places where you have terrain/environmental enhancment of ground winds. One other trick I have seen is a micro turbine attached to a kite (and a balloon on one occasion) and flown above the ground layer. Even better wind.
These things are very useful at times.
Think about how well these work in the mountains of afghanistan and other places where you have terrain/environmental enhancment of ground winds. One other trick I have seen is a micro turbine attached to a kite (and a balloon on one occasion) and flown above the ground layer. Even better wind.
These things are very useful at times.
You have tangentially identified the one real potential for RELIABLE wind energy IMHO, tethered mills; mills that are flown into the jet stream and provide power down thru the tether.ladajo wrote: One other trick I have seen is a micro turbine attached to a kite (and a balloon on one occasion) and flown above the ground layer. Even better wind.
That saphire SC makes this even MORE intreging.
If the mill is big enough, microwave transmission may also be feasible.
FYI
http://www.skywindpower.com/ww/index.htm
@ladajo
http://kitegen.com/
http://kitegen.com/
It's quite an easy and elegant solution.
They have more than 2 years delay in development due to bureaucratic issues.
Their next tests should be in the 2000-2500 mt height (6000 to 8000 Ft), but getting approval to operate at that altitude in Italy is like getting approval for a new nuclear reactor model in USA. I start to doubt that they will ever get it.
They have more than 2 years delay in development due to bureaucratic issues.
Their next tests should be in the 2000-2500 mt height (6000 to 8000 Ft), but getting approval to operate at that altitude in Italy is like getting approval for a new nuclear reactor model in USA. I start to doubt that they will ever get it.
In the roaring 50s (50-60 degree south latitude), the jet steam almost reaches the ocean. MASSIVE wind energy potential there.
Get a used oil tanker, install some LH tanks, and go sailing with kite generators. Use the electricity to mine the H from water.
Meet up with transfer tankers when you get near full.
Get a used oil tanker, install some LH tanks, and go sailing with kite generators. Use the electricity to mine the H from water.
Meet up with transfer tankers when you get near full.
-
- Posts: 2039
- Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2011 4:30 am
Useless idea.KitemanSA wrote:Get a used oil tanker, install some LH tanks, and go sailing with kite generators. Use the electricity to mine the H from water.
I would believe in utilization of wind energy for radio's, forward observer equipment's, etc. I doubt in usefulness. But not sure and may be I am wrong.
But electrolyze of water for hydrogen production, aluminum production or chlorine require very big amount of electric energy. Renewable assets being in reasonable size could not produce so much energy.
If you are still interested in the evening (Tbilisi time) I can provide you data how many kW*h is needed for production of 1 ton of above mentioned products.
Not renewables but hydro or fission energy is used for aluminum and chlorine production.
And hydrogen now is produced not via electrolyze but via steam reforming mainly of natural gas.
-
- Posts: 2039
- Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2011 4:30 am
As promised I will provide you data how much kw*h is needed for producing of unit of mass hydrogen.KitemanSA wrote:Averaging 1kW/m² is not a bad return. And in the roaring 50s it would only take tethers about 1-2 km long, unlike in the northern hemisphere where you need 6-10km tethers to reach winds speeds that give such good results. Such long tethers are plenty difficult to manage in a variable wind.
By memory I remember e.g. 1 metric ton aluminum requires about 13000 kW*h.
I am afraid that payback period of your proposal to produce hydrogen using wind energy will have hundreds years order.
The investment cost of 1kW installed power vs. annual production of kW*h, etc.
For note hydrogen now is produced in big amounts for ammonia. But nobody produces even using much cheaper electricity from NPP or HPP. Renewable energy is costly. Yes, you do not spend any fuel but you have very high cost of installed power and not stable energy source.
The situation with hydrogen production can be changed in near future when the price on natural gas will exceed some limit.
But source of electricity will be only nuclear or hydropower. Due to in times lower production cost. And, certainly, fusion is more preferable than fission.
Joeseph,
Check this site out...I think it can help you understand further about field deployable renewable systems.
http://www.tacticalsheltersystems.com/
Check this site out...I think it can help you understand further about field deployable renewable systems.
http://www.tacticalsheltersystems.com/