Joseph Chikva wrote: KitemanSA wrote:You seem to take "lack of proof" as "proof of lack". This is a "religious" argument. But heck, you are allowed your own religious beliefs.
In God we trust. Yes.
But also I trust in very simple rules formulated very well by Tomklarck: "Extraordinary claims should be confirmed by extraordinary evidences."
I just said that. Many times.
Joseph Chikva wrote: Certainly you can right to believe me if I would say: “I can build time machine”
Here is where you go astray. Nowhere did I state or imply or even suggest that "I believe" Rossi. But neither is there
"proof" that he is perpetrating a fraud. You may suspect so. That makes you wise. But if you state you "know" so, where is your proof? Purported statements of FACT require proof. He needs to Prove he is right. You need to PROVE you are right. Till then, not proven EITHER WAY!
Joseph Chikva wrote: Lack of evidence does not mean evidence of lack.
Now I am selling that time machine.
Price one billion North American rubles. Not fraud?
Is it? Have you made such a claim?
I presume your statements have been hypothetical.
Given that, I presume that I would suspect strongly that you are a fraud. But until the data are in, "not proven". But don't expect ME to line up to buy one.